amfoto1 wrote in post #9109819
It might spoil you and make you want more high quality primes!
It might spoil you and make you want more high quality primes!
TOOOOOOOOO LATE!
S30L28 Senior Member  448 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: États-Unis More info | Dec 01, 2009 18:05 | #31 amfoto1 wrote in post #9109819 It might spoil you and make you want more high quality primes! TOOOOOOOOO LATE! -Brian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jasonleehl Senior Member 521 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Dec 01, 2009 18:14 | #32 The 24-70 and 135 is very versatile on covering events and walkabouts. But personal taste for travelling is 17-40 & 135. You're welcome to follow me at Instagram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zshaft Senior Member 357 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Dec 02, 2009 09:14 | #33 .mark. wrote in post #9108423 Anyone shoot with the following combination? 24-70 and 135. I'm gonna go FF sometime in Jan when I get a load of £ from work doing overtime over new year and I'm thinking about lenses... I've also got a 1.4x that I picked up locally second hand so that would make the 135 more versatile.
Canon 1Dx | 24 L II | 85 L II | 200 L II | Extender 1.4x & 2x III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
albasit Member  35 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia More info | Dec 02, 2009 13:04 | #34 hehe, this is my combo 5D 50 135 24-70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ken2000ac Goldmember  1,405 posts Likes: 669 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland More info | Dec 02, 2009 13:33 | #35 I took this combo to Europe on my honeymoon along with a 5D. I wanted to travel light. It was an agonizing decision on what to take, but I think I made the right choice. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Theus Member 154 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Dec 02, 2009 20:45 | #36 24-70 + 135 is a great FF combo. The main thing it's missing, IMO is a wide aperture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
.mark. THREAD STARTER Goldmember  1,038 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Jersey, Channel Islands More info | Dec 03, 2009 01:49 | #37 Theus wrote in post #9124546 24-70 + 135 is a great FF combo. The main thing it's missing, IMO is a wide aperture. If it doesn't bust your budget, you might consider adding something like a 50 f/1.4 to the mix just for the times when you need those extra stops. The 50 f/1.4 would also be a nice lightweight alternative to the brick for those times when you wanted something more portable. Yeah this will be next on my list (a quote from a post earlier in the thread) .mark. wrote in post #9109585 .... The other priority I have is a FF replacement for my sigma 30mm. I'm aiming for the sigma 50 but have the canon 50 1.8 to start me off... 5DIII :: 15FE :: 16-35LII :: 24LII :: 50L :: 85 1.8 :: 135L :: 100-400L :: 430EX2 :: 580EX2 :: YN560II x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1234 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
love it !