Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 01 Dec 2009 (Tuesday) 04:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon 15-85 vs. 18-200. How do they compare ?

 
Thor_50D
Member
58 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Outdoors Romania
     
Dec 01, 2009 04:31 |  #1

I see lately there's a lot of talk about the (NEW) 15-85. But what about the (OLD) 18-200 ? How do they compare ? How much more better is the new lens ?


Thor
Canon EOS 50D, EF 50 MkII, EF-S 60 Macro, Sigma 17-70, EF-S 55-250
Nature, micro & Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,164 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
     
Dec 01, 2009 04:57 |  #2

Quite a bit better, I'd imagine. I was surprised at the image quality of the 15-85 when I had it on loan a couple of weeks back. It wasn't as good as my 17-55 (nor did I expect it to be), but not that far behind amazingly, even wide-open. More generally, the MTF figures for the 15-85 are very solid. I don't have any hands-on experience with the 18-200, but going from the MTF figures, user reviews (here on POTN and elsewhere) and samples, I'd say it's a decent superzoom (roughly on par with the Nikkor 18-200), but exhibits the usual compromises of such lenses - inferior image quality, in particular.

Basically, if you're getting the 18-200, you really want the versatility of a superzoom. Otherwise the 15-85 is the sure winner.


Col | Flickr (external link)

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oRGie
Senior Member
398 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Portugal
     
Dec 01, 2009 07:36 as a reply to  @ Collin85's post |  #3

I have these 2 lenses, I would say you cannot fairly compare the 2. The 15-85 is a much better lens for IQ, its canons ef-s answer to the ef24-105L and it gives it a real run for its money.

The 18-200 is a very good superzoom, but thats what it is and so cannot really compete with lenses with a more specific focul range.

Basically they are designed for different purposes.

If you want best IQ then 15-85 and a 70-200L (F4 or 2.8, IS or no IS) is a good pairing.

If you want easy to carry around, one lens does all, then the 18-200 wont dissapoint.

A lot of people will say no to the 15-85 and suggest 17-55 or whatever, but for me 15 is wide enough that I dont need the 10-20 I used to use.


oRGie - I am an EOS and the 7D was my idea :cool:
http://www.fluidr.com/​photos/orgie (external link)
EF70-200F4LIS - EF-S15-85IS - EF50 1.8II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
borism
Goldmember
Avatar
3,415 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 146
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Florida, Weston
     
Dec 01, 2009 08:00 |  #4

Maybe this can help
http://www.the-digital-picture.com …&SampleComp=0&F​LI=3&API=0 (external link)

I have a 18-200, is a very nice and fun lens to use
Is my Family / vacation lens and performs very nicely, gives very nice color and contrast
I did a comparison with my 18-55IS here
http://www.flickr.com …8/sets/72157622​216147556/ (external link)
While the focus is not USM, is very fast and spot on

The 18-200 is a lens filled with compromises for the pixel peeper , but it delivers a very convenient package and very nice usable pictures

I am assuming by looking the iso test that the new 15-85 is a better lens, has USM, FTM ring override, but also it has a more limited range up to 85mm compared to 200mm at a almost 40% more cash.
Of course, the 18-200 should be much better at 86mm to 200mm :p

I am selling my 18-200 to fund other upgrades, but I'd love to keep it just because it's convenience factor

Just my 2 cents


CANON 6D - SONY A6000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

11,313 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 15-85 vs. 18-200. How do they compare ?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is laptesf
798 guests, 226 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.