I have shot this one with 24-70mm it has some motion to the flower and facial expression from the bride and waiting girls.
Shot at : F-stop f/4.5, exposure 1/60sec, ISO400, focal length 24mm
![]() | HTTP response: 503 | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | I have shot this one with 24-70mm it has some motion to the flower and facial expression from the bride and waiting girls.
Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 09, 2009 20:31 | #17 Arman's photo shows the problem of using just one flash... the background's quite dark. You can fix it up in ACR using the adjustment brush, or in Photoshop using layers. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | Dec 09, 2009 21:30 | #18 tim wrote in post #9167886 Arman's photo shows the problem of using just one flash... the background's quite dark. You can fix it up in ACR using the adjustment brush, or in Photoshop using layers. True, Gary Fong speciality Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 09, 2009 21:44 | #19 This was shot with his LS? GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | Dec 09, 2009 21:54 | #20 sapearl wrote in post #9168267 This was shot with his LS? Lithsphere Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 09, 2009 22:01 | #21 I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line. Armans Photography wrote in post #9168345 =Arman's Photography;9168345]Lithsphere GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | Dec 09, 2009 22:13 | #22 sapearl wrote in post #9168381 I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line. You had a tough environment here with a single flash. Bare bulb, slightly angled to the ceiling would have helped a little bit more, but that far back wall put you at an unfortunate disadvantage for lighting. True and true , might be better with white card extended, but than like you said the wall is to far back Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Dec 09, 2009 22:36 | #23 ...You have a 5D II. Push it up to ISO6400 and shoot f/2.8. 5+ stops of light and better mix of ambient - You could even afford to quadruple your shutter speed and still get 3+ extra stops of light (8x light gathering). ISO400, f/4.5? What a waste. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 09, 2009 22:53 | #24 sapearl wrote in post #9168381 I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line. You had a tough environment here with a single flash. Bare bulb, slightly angled to the ceiling would have helped a little bit more, but that far back wall put you at an unfortunate disadvantage for lighting. The Lightsphere wouldn't have change things much. Bounce flash would've had much the same result, direct flash may have worked better but would've looked pretty bad. Bouncing off a wall to the left may have worked, as the difference between the subject distances would be smaller, if there was a white wall there. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2009 00:20 | #25 tim wrote in post #9168656 Bouncing off a wall to the left may have worked, as the difference between the subject distances would be smaller, if there was a white wall there. Or a 2nd strobe to the right and bounced off the ceiling maybe?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 10, 2009 00:50 | #26 RT McAllister wrote in post #9168998 Or a 2nd strobe to the right and bounced off the ceiling maybe? Yeah multiple light solutions are easy, it's the single light case that's difficult. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Dec 10, 2009 01:47 | #27 If you have two flashes you don't need to bounce, it's wasteful during the very fast-paced bouquet toss. Shooting direct (with off-camera flash) from a good distance (for evenness of light distribution) at low power gives the shot and fast recycle times. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | That was actualy shot with 40D and 430EXII before I got 5D and 580EXII, there was no wall to the left or right, it was pretty much in the middle of banquet hall, to the left I had probably 70 feet to the wall and to the right about 50, pillars also to small to bounce. Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1035 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||