Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 01 Dec 2009 (Tuesday) 20:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do you guys shoot the bouquet toss?

 
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:27 as a reply to  @ post 9122167 |  #16

I have shot this one with 24-70mm it has some motion to the flower and facial expression from the bride and waiting girls.

Shot at : F-stop f/4.5, exposure 1/60sec, ISO400, focal length 24mm

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 503 | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:31 |  #17

Arman's photo shows the problem of using just one flash... the background's quite dark. You can fix it up in ACR using the adjustment brush, or in Photoshop using layers.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:30 |  #18

tim wrote in post #9167886 (external link)
Arman's photo shows the problem of using just one flash... the background's quite dark. You can fix it up in ACR using the adjustment brush, or in Photoshop using layers.

True, Gary Fong speciality:)


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:44 |  #19

This was shot with his LS?

Armans Photography wrote in post #9168197 (external link)
=Arman's Photography;9168197]Tr​ue, Gary Fong speciality:)


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:54 |  #20

sapearl wrote in post #9168267 (external link)
This was shot with his LS?

Lithsphere


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Dec 09, 2009 22:01 |  #21

I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line.

You had a tough environment here with a single flash. Bare bulb, slightly angled to the ceiling would have helped a little bit more, but that far back wall put you at an unfortunate disadvantage for lighting.

Armans Photography wrote in post #9168345 (external link)
=Arman's Photography;9168345]Li​thsphere


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 09, 2009 22:13 |  #22

sapearl wrote in post #9168381 (external link)
I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line.

You had a tough environment here with a single flash. Bare bulb, slightly angled to the ceiling would have helped a little bit more, but that far back wall put you at an unfortunate disadvantage for lighting.

True and true , might be better with white card extended, but than like you said the wall is to far back


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Dec 09, 2009 22:36 |  #23

...You have a 5D II. Push it up to ISO6400 and shoot f/2.8. 5+ stops of light and better mix of ambient - You could even afford to quadruple your shutter speed and still get 3+ extra stops of light (8x light gathering). ISO400, f/4.5? What a waste.

With a single light source the best chance of relatively even lighting was to boost ISO and open aperture, and bounce off the wall (and slightly ceiling) to his left.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2009 22:53 |  #24

sapearl wrote in post #9168381 (external link)
I believe you know what happened then. The LS did an ok job with the foreground bride, but killed off at least 1-2 stops of output to the "receiving" line.

You had a tough environment here with a single flash. Bare bulb, slightly angled to the ceiling would have helped a little bit more, but that far back wall put you at an unfortunate disadvantage for lighting.

The Lightsphere wouldn't have change things much. Bounce flash would've had much the same result, direct flash may have worked better but would've looked pretty bad. Bouncing off a wall to the left may have worked, as the difference between the subject distances would be smaller, if there was a white wall there.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Dec 10, 2009 00:20 |  #25

tim wrote in post #9168656 (external link)
Bouncing off a wall to the left may have worked, as the difference between the subject distances would be smaller, if there was a white wall there.

Or a 2nd strobe to the right and bounced off the ceiling maybe?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 10, 2009 00:50 |  #26

RT McAllister wrote in post #9168998 (external link)
Or a 2nd strobe to the right and bounced off the ceiling maybe?

Yeah multiple light solutions are easy, it's the single light case that's difficult.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Dec 10, 2009 01:47 |  #27

If you have two flashes you don't need to bounce, it's wasteful during the very fast-paced bouquet toss. Shooting direct (with off-camera flash) from a good distance (for evenness of light distribution) at low power gives the shot and fast recycle times.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Dec 10, 2009 19:04 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #28

That was actualy shot with 40D and 430EXII before I got 5D and 580EXII, there was no wall to the left or right, it was pretty much in the middle of banquet hall, to the left I had probably 70 feet to the wall and to the right about 50, pillars also to small to bounce.


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,813 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
How do you guys shoot the bouquet toss?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1035 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.