State High School Football

I havent really posted any action shots of what I have been up to lately and so I thought I'd show what I shot last weekend. Missouri High School Football Championships were last weekend and there were some good games.

1.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Very Strong Effort Sir...

Really nice work. #1 is killer!!

Thanks guys. I appreciate it. Its too bad I can not sell these... I was freelancing for the company that has the exclusive right to sell however and got a call from them and they told me these are flying off the site like no other.. So I guess their happy lol

In picture #7 the quarterback #13 is Trevor Tanner... I'm from Cassville.

And I think the Wildcat in the last one is my brother.

Looks good man.

canonnoob wrote in post #9123652
Thanks guys. I appreciate it. Its too bad I can not sell these... I was freelancing for the company that has the exclusive right to sell however and got a call from them and they told me these are flying off the site like no other.. So I guess their happy lol

Cool... Getting a cut of the action at all?

I've shot two D1 NCAA games now and can't do a thing with 'em either.

Merkin wrote in post #9123692
In picture #7 the quarterback #13 is Trevor Tanner... I'm from Cassville.

And I think the Wildcat in the last one is my brother.

Looks good man.

Really? No way. Well they are all on photogliff's website if you all want any. I think the number of they guy in the last shot was 20 let me check when I get home.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #9123693
Cool... Getting a cut of the action at all?

I've shot two D1 NCAA games now and can't do a thing with 'em either.

Sadly no cut.. But I made a lot of money lol. I can do everything but sell them so that's nice. Plus they send buisness down my when asked to shoot in my area.

1st image is IMHO the best image you've ever posted ever.

Great Capture

Palladium wrote in post #9123891
1st image is IMHO the best image you've ever posted ever.

Great Capture

Thanks it is definately one of the best I have shot.

the photo's look great .. however I have a question on why you are posting images that you gave your right's up to with your water mark on them?? I am just curious as to how that works?

themadcow wrote in post #9123986
the photo's look great .. however I have a question on why you are posting images that you gave your right's up to with your water mark on them?? I am just curious as to how that works?

The shots are still mine. Consider it as freelance work. The photos are still mine hence the watermark. But because I gave up the rights to sell them doesn't mean they are not mine.

great work as usual...

I am not familiar with freelance work which is why I ask.. If you don't have the right to sell the image then why can you post an image that you have no right to sell? Do they post your images with your water mark on them or there's? Or should you be posting with there water mark? I know with the Internet people can steal images.. and at least with a water mark you are advertising your service.. but if they paid you for the image rights to sell should they not be the ones on the water mark?.. I am curious as to how that actually works.. I really like the first image.. that's MONEY if you ask me

focus.pocus wrote in post #9124112
great work as usual...

Thanks.

themadcow wrote in post #9124153
I am not familiar with freelance work which is why I ask.. If you don't have the right to sell the image then why can you post an image that you have no right to sell? Do they post your images with your water mark on them or there's? Or should you be posting with there water mark? I know with the Internet people can steal images.. and at least with a water mark you are advertising your service.. but if they paid you for the image rights to sell should they not be the ones on the water mark?.. I am curious as to how that actually works.. I really like the first image.. that's MONEY if you ask me

in theory. They paid for my services. So the copyright stays with me. on their site they use "proof" over the shots. My site adds the watermark upon upload but removes for printing.

some how I think there is much more to it that that.. A whole legal side which I will ask in a different thread.. But the photo's are great ... excelent work!!