PMCphotography wrote in post #9132009
I'll bet this was the exact same discussion photographers had when 35mm camera were
just released, then when digital overtook film.
Yes, but the difference is cost now...once you make the initial purchase of a digital p&s, what other cost is there if you never have prints made..With 35mm you still had the added time and cost of getting prints made...a cost high enough to discourage most people from doing it..look around how many more cameras do you see now then in the heyday of 35mm...doesnt make the images better we all know that..
Look at flickr and read some of the comments on some of the rather plain jane boring images...the perception is changing of what is considered "good" and now seems to be "good enough", yes the exceptional images still generate many more comments, but look at the images people are willing to put out there overall...
I agree with others, paid professionals will still exist, just in much smaller numbers, and a much smaller niche as it seems that the public is now willing to accept lesser quality in a number of areas in order to save money...you know quantity over quality..
EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website
| Fine Art America