Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 04 Dec 2009 (Friday) 21:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

photo technique

 
m&J ­ Photography
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 04, 2009 21:01 |  #1

Hey everyone. I was wondering if any of you know what type of style this technique is and how I would go about getting these results in a photo. It is obviously edited in photoshop. I want to know what this is.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lizzy_k/3766514​616/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nate ­ P.
Senior Member
Avatar
278 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Monterey Bay, Calif.
     
Dec 04, 2009 21:06 |  #2

Um, good lighting?


fuji x100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m&J ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 04, 2009 21:15 |  #3

Well it is edited with photoshop and they are doing something to obtain this look.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Dec 04, 2009 22:25 |  #4

First I am going to assume that there is no 3rd party program in use here. I have both NIK and Tiffen plug-ins, and they both offer a bleaching process that can generate a similar look.

Second, PS is no cure for bad lighting. The previous post, though not entirely helpful, was truthful.

It is kind of hard to see what was done without seeing what it looked like before. That being said, let me offer this suggestion. Take a look at the shot, and try to see what gives it it's "look". Three things I notice, fairly high contrast, desaturated colors, and a crisp sharpness. You will get in the same neighborhood if you duplicate the layer, desaturate it, and set the blend mode to one of the Contrast blends, then separately add a High Pass layer for sharpness.

I grabbed a shot that I took in the artist district near Sacre Couer in Paris. Lighting was overcast and flat, so I am starting with a fairly low contrast shot.

I ended up creating three additional layers. Top layer was desaturated, blend mode set to "Screen" and 50% opacity. Next layer was also desaturated, and also set at 50% opacity, but instead this was set with a blend mode of "Soft Light" The next layer also desaturated, then treated with a High Pass filter (amount would depend on the size of the original image. Blend mode to "Hard Light" and this one was 100% opacity.

Below is the before and after. Granted it may not be exactly like the example you posted (probably a function of the difference in lighting in the respective source shots), but this does get near it, and gives you a direction for experimentation.

Rad


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Dec 04, 2009 22:27 |  #5

100% crop of the above. Notice that the process does also introduce an amount of luma grain.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digital_zen
Senior Member
Avatar
390 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Northeast Georgia, U.S.
     
Dec 05, 2009 11:00 |  #6

Looks like a simple drop in saturation to me, of about 15-20%. Maybe a bit of burning and dodging...?


You will find no more zen at the top of a mountain, than the zen that you bring there with you.

~zen proverb~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m&J ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 05, 2009 12:15 as a reply to  @ Digital_zen's post |  #7

thank you for the direction. Radtech you got me on the track I needed. Thank you very much




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

857 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
photo technique
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2890 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.