Does anyone have one of these things? We are thinking about getting one because it 'seems' like it could be a pretty great system. But I'd like some feedback on it before ordering.
http://www.calumetphoto.com/item/MP0500/![]()
kortag Member 152 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Dec 05, 2009 18:41 | #1 Does anyone have one of these things? We are thinking about getting one because it 'seems' like it could be a pretty great system. But I'd like some feedback on it before ordering. -Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | Dec 05, 2009 18:57 | #2 Ooo I like that item. I would be interested in hearing reports about it as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
snakekid Senior Member 373 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Dec 05, 2009 18:58 | #3 seems like it would fall over with slight winds -Will
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 05, 2009 19:07 | #4 I agree with the above snake. One big sale. Plus you have to buy their muslins to fit it. www.freezeframe.photo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tetrode I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information 3,777 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2006 Location: New York More info | Dec 05, 2009 20:14 | #5 CliffordPhotography wrote in post #9142079 I agree with the above snake. One big sale. Plus you have to buy their muslins to fit it. The new issue of "Calumet Focus" features this background system on the back cover. According to the verbiage, the sale price includes a musln:
Contrary to the above, the product page on the Calumet site suggests muslin panels are optional. $170 for the frame, stand, bag, and muslin panel seems like a good deal (though I've never seen this product and know nothing about it). Dave F.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mossman6 Senior Member 952 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Sacramento, California More info | Dec 05, 2009 22:54 | #6 subscribed as well. looks like there's interest but no feedback as of yet. My name is Josh. I love FB likes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yeah the magazine was where we first saw it too. I also noticed the difference between the magazine ad and the website. -Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
georgemw Goldmember 4,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Dec 06, 2009 06:33 | #8 At that price for just the stand it sounded a bit overpriced, but at $169 including a muslin, it's starting to sound like it might be worth looking into. regards, george w
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmward Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 06, 2009 09:34 | #9 I have one and it works well. David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmward Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 06, 2009 10:04 | #10 Here's another shot on the background. David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmward Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 06, 2009 10:09 | #11 and here's one in color. David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cassie Goldmember More info | Dec 06, 2009 10:29 | #12 I also own this and its not bad at all. I have the white and gray muslim. Set-up is quick and easy, but you need plenty of room, if your worried about wind just get a couple sand bags or leg weights and you should be fine. http://thompson-photo.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2009 10:32 | #13 Subject to Muslin distance in these David? www.freezeframe.photo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkBooth Senior Member 393 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2003 More info | I also own the Calumet On-SIte system. I feel it is an excellent solution for location work. It's easy to assemble (can easily be done by one person), relatively lightweight to carry in its included bag, and the hand-painted muslins are of good quality. I've had experience with some more traditional sized "economy" muslins and I feel these Calumet On-Site muslins are of superior quality. "If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmward Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 06, 2009 12:18 | #15 The boy and his mom were probably 4 feet in front, the boy alone maybe 6 feet. And the Blonde is about 4-5 feet. Mom and son were shot with 70-200 as was the boy. Probably about 100-125. Blonde was shot with 24-105 at close to 105. David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1747 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||