Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 07 Dec 2009 (Monday) 15:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

shooting a wedding at night

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 07, 2009 19:56 |  #16

enginyr wrote in post #9153824 (external link)
Thanks Tim. I will try it tonight. "Grain is my Bain!"

I do find the fong thing to soften the light a bit when I must shoot on-camera-flash.

Do you shoot with a huge flash bracket?

"Softness" is related to the light source size and distance. Given typical distances increasing the flash head size by about four times like the Fong Dong does doesn't give significant softness. People often see what they want to see.

I rarely use on camera flash as the main light, more often I have my assistant holding a soft box off camera, radio triggered. It works well.

SoCal wrote in post #9153876 (external link)
I wonder if going grain will work best and use a program like Noise Ninja to bring back the sharpness of the image. It's worked well shooting late night sports.

I have NN pro, I use it maybe once a year when I REALLY stuff up an exposure. I didn't use it in the ISO12,800 image I printed 14".


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert16
I feel like such a square
Avatar
2,178 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2007
Location: UK
     
Dec 08, 2009 04:16 |  #17

enginyr wrote in post #9152755 (external link)
I could push the iso but then they'd be all grainy. Anyone who has any experience to lend would be appreciated. I wouldn't feel like going over 800. 1600 if there was some light but especially with black's the high iso does very bad.

I'm glad someone with enough experience to suit you came along.

;)


Robert.

gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zshaft
Senior Member
357 posts
Joined May 2009
     
Dec 08, 2009 04:20 |  #18

enginyr wrote in post #9152755 (external link)
I could push the iso but then they'd be all grainy. Anyone who has any experience to lend would be appreciated. I wouldn't feel like going over 800. 1600 if there was some light but especially with black's the high iso does very bad.

first of all, lucky u to have 5d2 with very good high iso.
for me, it's better to get grainy pics rather than blurry pics.
if i were u and took the wedding nite shot,i would push up the iso max 6400 (depends on condition), and bring your best wide-open lens --> but i don't think it would be very very dark outside there.
if possible , bring additional lighting + light stand around the venue (i mean, not external flash).
external flash is ok to be set on 5d2.

use 5d mostly for inside the church..with descent lighting..:D

hope this thread can help u.


Canon 1Dx | 24 L II | 85 L II | 200 L II | Extender 1.4x & 2x III
Sigma 120-300 mm 2.8 OS HSM.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 08, 2009 10:33 |  #19

I have Noise ninja but It really slows down the work flow. It would be nice to have in included into Lightroom although the one grain removal already in Lightroom is not too bad. I took some iso6400 last night and showed the wife and she couldn't even tell what I was talking about. lol I was cringing.

If softness is caused by size and distance, why not just take ten steps back and remove the softbox?


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 08, 2009 22:13 |  #20

flawless idea!


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 08, 2009 22:14 |  #21

shomat wrote in post #9161735 (external link)
What about a composite image? Do a long exposure of the background, then do a second exposure optimized for the subjects and put it all together in post.

enginyr wrote in post #9161783 (external link)
flawless idea!

Flaw one is it takes time, effort, and always looks fake when you do it in post. Flaw two is it takes time, which is a luxury at weddings. Flaw three is requiring a tripod, which is more a pita than a flaw.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2009 02:36 |  #22

The first one looks really good, but it could be done with two lights or even one with a longer exposure if you know what you're doing. Well it depends on the light balance, but you could get close with a single exposure.

The second looks very fake to me.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 09, 2009 10:24 |  #23

shomat thank you. I know it looks a little fake to us but I'm sure the clients would be extremely happy with those results.

Does anyone else have an impressive example of night time wedding photography.

I just picked up a fisheye last night. Hopefully I can use it tastefully.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Dec 09, 2009 16:46 as a reply to  @ enginyr's post |  #24

Tim really knows his stuff. He is correct in saying that good flash technique is your best bet. With good flash, you can get high quality shots of the whole ceremony. Flash is all about balancing the ambient with your flash to get a pleasing enough mix. You can get clean, pleasing, and sharp photos of the bride and groom even in total darkness. I LOVE shooting at night!

Here are some examples of night shooting. All of them are shot at shutter speeds too slow to get a clean, blur-free image of their faces, but with proper use of flash you can shoot the environment AND the people at once and make them BOTH look exactly how to want it to.

1. ISO800 F/4.5 1/15

IMAGE: http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/POTN/NightShooting/221608_2245.jpg

2. This was SUPER dark! ISO800 F/2.8 13 SECONDS shutter speed.
IMAGE: http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/POTN/NightShooting/225118_8376.jpg

3. ISO800 F/5.6 1/4
IMAGE: http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/POTN/NightShooting/230054_5539.jpg

4. ISO800 F/6.3 1/2
IMAGE: http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/POTN/NightShooting/230706_0133.jpg

5. ISO400 F/5.6 3.2 SECONDS
IMAGE: http://www.nightanddayphoto.ca/misc/forumpics/POTN/NightShooting/245249_5869.jpg

The principle for the ceremony is exactly the same. Set up your camera to capture the ambient how to want it, and setup flashes around the venue to light up the people the way you want them to look. NO messing around in photoshop after. You should be able to instantly deliver 200 jpegs straight off the camera with this technique if you do it right. As professionals, we need to be able to handle any technical situation to allow the clients to have their wedding with *no* compromise.

-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 09, 2009 17:09 |  #25

Lloyd.Realllly nice work. I see you have the same thing about not going over iso800. Do you carry around your tripod/mono pod all the time.

I could see myself doing it for e-sessions. I don't know about a full wedding.


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2009 17:45 as a reply to  @ enginyr's post |  #26

Here's a few random ones at higher than ISO800, with exif on it. Forgot the shutter speed sorry, they'll all be in the 1/100th region. They're not as spectacular as Lloyd's, but it's the same idea of expose for the background, flash for the subject. I've made them relatively large so you can see the image quality's great!

IMAGE: http://mrwild.co.nz/unprotected/potn/1600-f2.jpg

IMAGE: http://mrwild.co.nz/unprotected/potn/3200-2.8.jpg

IMAGE: http://mrwild.co.nz/unprotected/potn/1600-2.8.jpg

Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 09, 2009 17:57 |  #27

Thank you Tim. As the days go by, I am breaking my "high iso" fear.


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:40 |  #28

enginyr wrote in post #9166852 (external link)
Lloyd.Realllly nice work. I see you have the same thing about not going over iso800. Do you carry around your tripod/mono pod all the time.

I could see myself doing it for e-sessions. I don't know about a full wedding.

enginyr wrote in post #9167114 (external link)
Thank you Tim. As the days go by, I am breaking my "high iso" fear.

I have no fear of going over 800. 1600 is probably one of my most used ISO levels overall, even on my 40D. Second place is 3200. I also use 6400 regularly. But if I can get away easily with 800, then of course i'll use it. Same with 400 and lower. Sometimes I shoot night shots at 100 because the slow shutter speeds don't bother me.

Trust me, I'm one of the LAST people to be bothered by noise in photos. I shot film for 15 years before switching to digital in 2005. And the noise in 800 film looks worse than 6400 nowadays. Get your exposure right and you won't have to worry about noise at all. I do not own ANY noise reduction software at all, mostly because I don't think we as wedding photographers need it at all.

I do not carry a tripod everywhere. If I'm going to do very slow shutter shots, then I'll get it out from the car. Otherwise, it's all handheld. I woubringld not want to use a tripod during a ceremony. Set your camera to whatever ISO you need to get a decent shutter handholdable speed and use flash for the rest. But who knows, you might have enough light there that you don't even need flash at all. Sometimes, artificial lighting in pretty gardens is quite good.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enginyr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
990 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: San Fernando Valley
     
Dec 10, 2009 14:13 |  #29

This just, it's supposed to rain! wow this doesn't pay enough!

I also need to shoot video of the ceremony portion. Anyone know which lens has the shortest infinity focus?


LA Wedding photographer (external link) Stunning Bride Photographers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 10, 2009 15:10 |  #30

enginyr wrote in post #9172126 (external link)
Anyone know which lens has the shortest infinity focus?

Infinity's usually quite a long way away. Not sure what you're talking about. Wide angle lenses have the most depth of field.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,959 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
shooting a wedding at night
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1156 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.