Not expecting the 5D to autofocus like a 1 series or a 7D... but I would hope it was slightly improved over my 2+year old 40D...
crotter Senior Member 286 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Alameda, California More info | Not expecting the 5D to autofocus like a 1 series or a 7D... but I would hope it was slightly improved over my 2+year old 40D... 5DII, 17-40 L, 50 1.8 II, 100 Macro 2.8, 100-300 5.6 L, Speedlite 580EXII/420EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rayk Goldmember More info | Dec 09, 2009 01:38 | #17 kurt765 wrote in post #9161110 Or is it just this bad? My 5DII is an upgrade to my 40d I had previously. What I've found with the 5DII is that the autofocus system is terrible in comparison. It hunts a lot. Take for instance the following scenario. Camera is on a tripod. Lens has no IS. Subject is static (mountains don't move fast enough to be seen with the naked eye) AEB is on Using cable release All AF points enabled Push button - camera completely refocuses before firing. Takes perfectly in focus scene, throws it out completely and focuses back again. Push button for second AEB exposure. It does the same thing. It's like it completely forgot what it was doing. Repeat, etc. etc. I can try to direct it to a single AF point but it will do the same thing. This morning it seemed to error completely at one point by throwing the lens to close focus instead of infinity and refusing to try the other direction until I had manually focused it almost there. WTF? I used to own a 20d, and this is theoretically the same AF system feature wise, right? The 40d could fire off a few dozen shots in the time it takes the 5D to focus 3 times on a static mountain. What am I doing wrong? I knew the AF system was going to be a downgrade from the 40d but I did not expect it to just plain SUCK. Aside from this I'm pretty happy with the new camera, since I do landscapes mostly... -K Have you spoken to Canon service? Regards Ray
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Dec 09, 2009 05:45 | #18 crotter wrote in post #9162594 Not expecting the 5D to autofocus like a 1 series or a 7D... but I would hope it was slightly improved over my 2+year old 40D... I would not expect an improvement over your 40D. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Dec 09, 2009 06:00 | #19 The center point of my 5D was better (more accurate more times) than my 40D's was as is the 5DII's. That was noticeable right away. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckckevin Goldmember 1,439 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Bay Area More info | Dec 09, 2009 06:29 | #20 i think calling into canon and speak with them will probably give you the best result. Kevin life= learning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Dec 09, 2009 07:16 | #21 We need a sample. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Dec 09, 2009 07:25 | #22 kurt765 wrote in post #9161110 Or is it just this bad? My 5DII is an upgrade to my 40d I had previously. What I've found with the 5DII is that the autofocus system is terrible in comparison. It hunts a lot. Take for instance the following scenario. Camera is on a tripod. Lens has no IS. Subject is static (mountains don't move fast enough to be seen with the naked eye) AEB is on Using cable release All AF points enabled Push button - camera completely refocuses before firing. Takes perfectly in focus scene, throws it out completely and focuses back again. Push button for second AEB exposure. It does the same thing. It's like it completely forgot what it was doing. Repeat, etc. etc. I can try to direct it to a single AF point but it will do the same thing. This morning it seemed to error completely at one point by throwing the lens to close focus instead of infinity and refusing to try the other direction until I had manually focused it almost there. WTF? I used to own a 20d, and this is theoretically the same AF system feature wise, right? The 40d could fire off a few dozen shots in the time it takes the 5D to focus 3 times on a static mountain. What am I doing wrong? I knew the AF system was going to be a downgrade from the 40d but I did not expect it to just plain SUCK. Aside from this I'm pretty happy with the new camera, since I do landscapes mostly... -K When you say "completely refocuses", do you mean that the lens focus moves far or does the camera just make a small forward/back movement to focus? Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Dec 09, 2009 07:29 | #23 trancerem wrote in post #9162586 well, i do not know why you feel disappointed, cause 5d mark II is around for few months and tons of reviews are avaible, and all specify that this is not a fast-focus camera. of course is precise, but not for hot-action-shots. Put it in AI Servo, select the center AF point with the invisible "assist" points activated, and you'll find that it does focus quickly. In one-shot, it chooses precision over speed. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 09, 2009 11:54 | #24 Tom W wrote in post #9163421 When you say "completely refocuses", do you mean that the lens focus moves far or does the camera just make a small forward/back movement to focus? Is the subject well-lit? The outer AF points are known to be a bit less sensitive in low-light than on other cameras and since they are not cross-type, have some trouble with verticle contrast boundaries compared to the 40D. The center point, however, is very accurate and works in situations at least as dark (if not darker) as the 40D. By "completely refocuses" I mean that it moves the focus far away before coming back. It's not a small movement. • http://www.kurtlawson.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:59 | #25 Actually, I don't think there is anything wrong with your camera and doubt that Canon service will be of any help. Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 09, 2009 15:35 | #26 I've never heard of this thumb focusing technique that you describe. I may give that a shot. Part of the motivation for this thread is that my 40d never does this. When a given focus point is set, it will not try to hunt if the subject is still in focus. The corresponding point will just blink red for a sec to indicate that the point is focused. I'm not used to having to focus, then set the lens to MF to keep it from hunting which is what I've had to do with this camera. The AF system is easily the single most disappointing aspect of the 5DII even if it was working properly, IMHO. Canon historically doesn't spread out AF points to cover a full frame sensor. Only the crop cameras have widespread points. Maybe that's changed but I seem to recall that the 1Ds series AF system is virtually identical to the 1D series, meaning that the points are clustered towards the center of the frame in the FF 1ds compared to the 1D. This relationship seems to be the same with the 5D / 5DII. If you were to crop in on the image in the 5DII viewfinder I think you'd find the af points pretty much line up with that of a xxd series camera. But anyway. I knew all this going in. I did not expect it to do this hunting crap though. • http://www.kurtlawson.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
versedmb Goldmember 4,448 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2006 More info | Dec 09, 2009 16:20 | #27 crotter wrote in post #9162491 Is the 5D2 autofocus really a downgrade from my 40D? I havent received my 5D2 yet... but If thats true I'm slightly disappointed... ![]() Yes. A silly decision by Canon for such a pricey camera, but its true. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | Dec 09, 2009 17:46 | #28 versedmb wrote in post #9166560 Yes. A silly decision by Canon for such a pricey camera, but its true. But what the OP describes is not at all normal. Actually, I think Canon made a decision to not upgrade the AF system on the 5D2 in order to keep the price as low as possible. If I recall correctly, it was intro'd at $2700, which was about $500 less than the 5D when it was intro'd three years earlier. 5D2 would have cost more if it also had an upgraded AF system. In addition, they might not have had any new system far enough along in the works yet (and were probably still reeling a bit - or even gun shy - from the fiasco over the 1D3's AF system issues, be they real or imagined). Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jorl Senior Member 594 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Sarnia, Ontario, Canada More info | Dec 09, 2009 17:55 | #29 crotter wrote in post #9162491 Is the 5D2 autofocus really a downgrade from my 40D? I havent received my 5D2 yet... but If thats true I'm slightly disappointed... ![]()
FOR SALE: Brand new Nikon 50mm 1.4G - Msg me for details
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 18, 2010 09:21 | #30 Nothing like reviving a dead horse. But..... I'm in Canada. Isn't that weird!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1557 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||