Oh wait, there is a model as well
How does it look? Nitpicks welcome
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Semmonka Goldmember ![]() 2,073 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Lahti, Finland More info | Dec 09, 2009 12:08 | #1 |
Dec 09, 2009 12:43 | #2 Semmonka wrote in post #9164959 ![]() Oh wait, there is a model as well ![]() How does it look? Nitpicks welcome
Perfect, but the eyes need more "glow", if you know what I mean. Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:23 | #3 Nitpick here! Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
korrektor Goldmember ![]() 4,908 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:44 | #4 good portrait, man! Skin processing is a bit too much. Now... I see the texture everywhere but this look unnatural. And the funny thing I just can't tell you why. Doesn't look like dodge and burn. But I wont make assumptions. Something is off in processing and I am really sorry that I can't tell you what exactly... WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Dec 09, 2009 17:08 | #5 |
Michael Bottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Dec 09, 2009 19:41 | #6 I like this shot... Skin looks pretty good, but maybe the forehead is too smooth? I can see texture on some of her face, but the far cheek and forehead look smooth... Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2009 19:58 | #7 For a magazine like Vogue, Vanity Fair or Elle, the skin is not over-done. Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phamster Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,315 posts Likes: 51 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Purdue - Go Boilers More info | Dec 09, 2009 20:10 | #8 Love ! "Lighting will make or break your photo"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FamilyJules Goldmember ![]() 3,104 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 09, 2009 20:40 | #9 Very nice shot! Beautiful model. after: *Jules* Gear: 2 x 7D| 40D | 2 x 17-55 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 70-200 2.8 IS |28-135 IS | 3 x 580EX II | www.JulieWilsonPhotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roman_t Cream of the Crop ![]() 5,271 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Astana, Kazakhstan More info | Dec 09, 2009 21:27 | #10 nice shot, vesa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2009 01:39 | #11 AmandaMarie wrote in post #9165436 ![]() Nitpick here! She needs more lift on her eyelashes or you get that sort of droopy thing where the eyelashes come down by the eyes. Otherwise I think it's gorgeous. Thanks for the nit korrektor wrote in post #9165587 ![]() good portrait, man! Skin processing is a bit too much. Now... I see the texture everywhere but this look unnatural. And the funny thing I just can't tell you why. Doesn't look like dodge and burn. But I wont make assumptions. Something is off in processing and I am really sorry that I can't tell you what exactly... 1 minute later edit - Ok, I think I see what's going on. The jaw is too smooth. It looks like it was liquified..is that it? the hair part on her shoulder needs to go as well. No liquify on face and I can see texture on jaw area. Now Im wondering what you are really seeing. Have a look at my latest post in G&N area and let me know do you see same thing on that image. Same model, similar PP Michael Bottoms wrote in post #9167597 ![]() I like this shot... Skin looks pretty good, but maybe the forehead is too smooth? I can see texture on some of her face, but the far cheek and forehead look smooth... Thank you Sir. I think there are areas I could have used layer mask to bring out more texture. I actually can see texture on forehead and that is my limit with overdone. When the texture is gone, I consider it overdone. However there are some times and places where doll kind of skin works really well. AmandaMarie wrote in post #9167700 ![]() For a magazine like Vogue, Vanity Fair or Elle, the skin is not over-done. Actually on those mags you can see even smoother skins Thanks pham FamilyJules wrote in post #9167939 ![]() Very nice shot! Beautiful model. I agree with the eye comment... they could use a little pop. I might have gone overboard with it, but it was a small JPG, so I could only do so much. With eyes like hers, it's hard not to play with them! before: after: I agree I need to fix her eyes. I also agree that your version is just a tad overdone. I need to clean the veins and find level between the two edits. Thanks for the effort Sir Oh finally. I just thought you are not satisfied with anything Vesa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GerVaj08 Member ![]() 195 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Saint Paul, MN More info | Dec 10, 2009 02:00 | #12 FamilyJules wrote in post #9167939 ![]() Very nice shot! Beautiful model. I agree with the eye comment... they could use a little pop. I might have gone overboard with it, but it was a small JPG, so I could only do so much. With eyes like hers, it's hard not to play with them! before: after:
Canon 5DII, Canon 24-105L, Canon 100L, Tamron 70-200 f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Karl Johnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Dec 10, 2009 02:24 | #13 ![]() Absolutely horrible..ye gads. Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FamilyJules Goldmember ![]() 3,104 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Southern California More info | I agree I need to fix her eyes. I also agree that your version is just a tad overdone. I need to clean the veins and find level between the two edits. Thanks for the effort I gave it another go... this time not so aggressively. *Jules* Gear: 2 x 7D| 40D | 2 x 17-55 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 70-200 2.8 IS |28-135 IS | 3 x 580EX II | www.JulieWilsonPhotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoOb's Goldmember ![]() More info | Dec 10, 2009 07:36 | #15 Are you using a Wacom Tablet for your editing or using a mouse Nikon D850, Gripped | Nikon 24-70 F2.8 | Sigma ART 50mm F1.4 | Nikon 14-24 F2.8 | Nikon 85mm F1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is JMHask8204 1617 guests, 207 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |