Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 09 Dec 2009 (Wednesday) 13:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Family shot in high key B&W

 
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Dec 09, 2009 13:24 |  #1

Other than the right hand placement, whatcha think? I'm biased so my opinion doesn't count!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmandaMarie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,211 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2009
     
Dec 09, 2009 13:32 |  #2

Perhaps a more relaxed pose with the hand would serve better. Otherwise, I like it!


Meow.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
korrektor
Goldmember
Avatar
4,908 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Dec 09, 2009 13:40 |  #3

this is not high key, but an image where contrast and brightness were pushed too far.
A high key image has very limited dark shades. Put the contrast back in place and burn the faces down a tad and ou will have a good photo.


WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmandaMarie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,211 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2009
     
Dec 09, 2009 14:01 |  #4

And when you do what he said, show me so I know what he's talking about lol


Meow.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Dec 09, 2009 15:23 |  #5

korrektor wrote in post #9165562 (external link)
this is not high key, but an image where contrast and brightness were pushed too far.
A high key image has very limited dark shades. Put the contrast back in place and burn the faces down a tad and ou will have a good photo.

Agreed. I'd have to start at square one to move the contrast back but I adjusted the gamma and burnt the faces.
better?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
korrektor
Goldmember
Avatar
4,908 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Dec 09, 2009 16:47 |  #6

i think it s better, but the mother is looking a tad scary. easy on her face and burn the kids a tad more


WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Slaterza
Goldmember
2,007 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Beijing, China
     
Dec 09, 2009 17:15 |  #7

The family looks relaxed and it is not easy to get a baby to look at the camera so kudo's for that. However, for the critique side of things. To be a true high key photo the family would have to be wearing white shot on a white background. The dark clothing makes this just a high contrast photo. The babies arm and clothes are blown you need to bring them back. Also the mom's hand placement as you said is a little distracting to the piece. The background is too bright bringing too much spill on the foreground people. When shooting a white background there should only be a two stop difference between the foreground subject and the background. If the foreground is exposed for f8 the background should be f11 here it appeaars to be brighter than that too me.


Sam Laterza flickr (external link) BLOG (external link)
Canon 50D, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 100-300, Sigma 105 Macro, Sigma 170-500, Canon 28-105, Canon 18-55 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Dec 09, 2009 19:48 |  #8

korrektor wrote in post #9166732 (external link)
i think it s better, but the mother is looking a tad scary. easy on her face and burn the kids a tad more

Agreed again. Good input, thank you! When I saved the file I was thinking I went overboard on her face, it was a quick edit to say the least.

Slaterza wrote in post #9166887 (external link)
The family looks relaxed and it is not easy to get a baby to look at the camera so kudo's for that. However, for the critique side of things. To be a true high key photo the family would have to be wearing white shot on a white background. The dark clothing makes this just a high contrast photo. The babies arm and clothes are blown you need to bring them back. Also the mom's hand placement as you said is a little distracting to the piece. The background is too bright bringing too much spill on the foreground people. When shooting a white background there should only be a two stop difference between the foreground subject and the background. If the foreground is exposed for f8 the background should be f11 here it appeaars to be brighter than that too me.

I like the bright white, I was shooting to blow it out. Without it being blown out I think the texture of the backdrop would have been too distracting. Thoughts?
Arguably though, the sleeves on the little girls arms are blown too in the process.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmandaMarie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,211 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2009
     
Dec 09, 2009 19:55 |  #9

I still like the first version better.


Meow.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Slaterza
Goldmember
2,007 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Beijing, China
     
Dec 09, 2009 22:21 |  #10

I assumed the backdrop was white seamless, if it is not and it has a texture you are right it can show if you do not blow it out totally, the best way to still keep the subject at just two stops over the background is then to move them farther away from the background so that the blasting does not get them too. This can be hard in a tight space since I am not sure what kind of room you have for this but that would be one solution.


Sam Laterza flickr (external link) BLOG (external link)
Canon 50D, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 100-300, Sigma 105 Macro, Sigma 170-500, Canon 28-105, Canon 18-55 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Undispu7ed
"Yeah I'm dirty minded."
470 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
     
Dec 10, 2009 01:07 |  #11

No thanks to 2nd edit. Blacks are too washed out now.


- Jon
5D MKII gripped |
35 1.4L | 85 1.2L MKII| 16-35 2.8L MKII | 70-200 2.8L IS | 3x RF-602 triggers/receivers | 580 EX II speedlite | 430 EX II speedlite | 2x AB800s | Vagabond II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Dec 10, 2009 09:20 |  #12

Slaterza wrote in post #9168492 (external link)
I assumed the backdrop was white seamless, if it is not and it has a texture you are right it can show if you do not blow it out totally, the best way to still keep the subject at just two stops over the background is then to move them farther away from the background so that the blasting does not get them too. This can be hard in a tight space since I am not sure what kind of room you have for this but that would be one solution.

Damn fine point and something I should have done! Love it, thank you! Sometimes we lose track of the obvious.

Undispu7ed wrote in post #9169120 (external link)
No thanks to 2nd edit. Blacks are too washed out now.

I do like the first one better but I totally understand what korrektor was getting at.
Good feedback everyone, thanks a bunch!


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,621 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Family shot in high key B&W
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1367 guests, 189 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.