Other than the right hand placement, whatcha think? I'm biased so my opinion doesn't count!
Mr.Clean Cream of the Crop 6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:24 | #1 Other than the right hand placement, whatcha think? I'm biased so my opinion doesn't count! Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:32 | #2 Perhaps a more relaxed pose with the hand would serve better. Otherwise, I like it! Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
korrektor Goldmember 4,908 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Dec 09, 2009 13:40 | #3 this is not high key, but an image where contrast and brightness were pushed too far. WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2009 14:01 | #4 And when you do what he said, show me so I know what he's talking about lol Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Clean THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Dec 09, 2009 15:23 | #5 korrektor wrote in post #9165562 this is not high key, but an image where contrast and brightness were pushed too far. A high key image has very limited dark shades. Put the contrast back in place and burn the faces down a tad and ou will have a good photo. Agreed. I'd have to start at square one to move the contrast back but I adjusted the gamma and burnt the faces. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
korrektor Goldmember 4,908 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Dec 09, 2009 16:47 | #6 i think it s better, but the mother is looking a tad scary. easy on her face and burn the kids a tad more WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Dec 09, 2009 17:15 | #7 The family looks relaxed and it is not easy to get a baby to look at the camera so kudo's for that. However, for the critique side of things. To be a true high key photo the family would have to be wearing white shot on a white background. The dark clothing makes this just a high contrast photo. The babies arm and clothes are blown you need to bring them back. Also the mom's hand placement as you said is a little distracting to the piece. The background is too bright bringing too much spill on the foreground people. When shooting a white background there should only be a two stop difference between the foreground subject and the background. If the foreground is exposed for f8 the background should be f11 here it appeaars to be brighter than that too me. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Clean THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Dec 09, 2009 19:48 | #8 korrektor wrote in post #9166732 i think it s better, but the mother is looking a tad scary. easy on her face and burn the kids a tad more Agreed again. Good input, thank you! When I saved the file I was thinking I went overboard on her face, it was a quick edit to say the least. Slaterza wrote in post #9166887 The family looks relaxed and it is not easy to get a baby to look at the camera so kudo's for that. However, for the critique side of things. To be a true high key photo the family would have to be wearing white shot on a white background. The dark clothing makes this just a high contrast photo. The babies arm and clothes are blown you need to bring them back. Also the mom's hand placement as you said is a little distracting to the piece. The background is too bright bringing too much spill on the foreground people. When shooting a white background there should only be a two stop difference between the foreground subject and the background. If the foreground is exposed for f8 the background should be f11 here it appeaars to be brighter than that too me. I like the bright white, I was shooting to blow it out. Without it being blown out I think the texture of the backdrop would have been too distracting. Thoughts? Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2009 19:55 | #9 I still like the first version better. Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Dec 09, 2009 22:21 | #10 I assumed the backdrop was white seamless, if it is not and it has a texture you are right it can show if you do not blow it out totally, the best way to still keep the subject at just two stops over the background is then to move them farther away from the background so that the blasting does not get them too. This can be hard in a tight space since I am not sure what kind of room you have for this but that would be one solution. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Undispu7ed "Yeah I'm dirty minded." 470 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Austin, TX More info | Dec 10, 2009 01:07 | #11 No thanks to 2nd edit. Blacks are too washed out now. - Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Clean THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Dec 10, 2009 09:20 | #12 Slaterza wrote in post #9168492 I assumed the backdrop was white seamless, if it is not and it has a texture you are right it can show if you do not blow it out totally, the best way to still keep the subject at just two stops over the background is then to move them farther away from the background so that the blasting does not get them too. This can be hard in a tight space since I am not sure what kind of room you have for this but that would be one solution. Damn fine point and something I should have done! Love it, thank you! Sometimes we lose track of the obvious. Undispu7ed wrote in post #9169120 No thanks to 2nd edit. Blacks are too washed out now. I do like the first one better but I totally understand what korrektor was getting at. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1367 guests, 189 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||