Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Dec 2009 (Wednesday) 19:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D AF tracking accuracy - accidental test

 
kosin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 09, 2009 19:59 |  #1

For the naysayers and the ones that still can't decide on leaving the xxD series for 7D I want to give you an idea how 7D performs with moving subjects.

I want to state that this was not intended to be a test from the begining but after seeing how well camera kept focus on the flying eagle, even though it flew behind the tree, I figured I will share the results.

I was taking the burst of shots and when I saw the eagle behind the tree I stopped shooting. Now I regret that I didn't continue taking more pictures to see when the camera will eventually fail to focus.

Following shots are a downsized full frames (not cropped, only resized for the web). Please note that eagle isn't on the center of the frame (my fault) but camera kept focus anyway - this is where the extra focusing points of 7D come handy ;)

Shots were taken with 400mm f/5.6 lens, using the AI Servo mode, 8fps, center AF Point Expansion with following C. Fn. III settings:
1 - one stop before SLOW setting
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 1

IMAGE: http://greggard.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p1066896514-4.jpg

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


EXIF data: 1/1250s at f/7.1 ISO 400

For a little bit bigger pictures on the black background click here => AF tracking (external link)

Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:36 |  #2

Thanks for posting a real world example.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kay188
Senior Member
825 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:40 |  #3

Not bad.


Ricoh GRD4 | Canon 1Ds, 1D, 1D2, 1D2n| Canon XTi | Tokina 11-16 F/2.8 | Canon 16-35L I | Canon 24 F/2.8 | Canon 35 F/2 | Canon 50 F/1.8 I | Canon 135L | Sigma 24-70 EX DG Macro | Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 APO EX DG | Sigma 30 F/1.4 |Sigma 50 F/1.4 |Sigma & Kenko 1.4x TC| Canon 580EX II | Sigma EF-500 Super | 2x Vivitar 285HV | RF-602 Triggers |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LibertyToad
Member
120 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:42 |  #4

I did something similar the other day with a car that drove behind a guy on the sidewalk and then behind some bushes. The camera tracked it the entire way--very cool. My settings were similar to the original posters.


Canon 7D, 17-85mm USM IS, 70-300mm USM IS, 24-105mm f/4 USM IS L, 35mm f/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Dec 09, 2009 20:48 |  #5

Wow... that's terrific!


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewphotoMan
Senior Member
Avatar
732 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 141
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Westchester, NY
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:08 |  #6

love it this camera impresses me every day


Alex
Nikon D4, Tamron 24-70 SP 2.8, Nikon 85mm 1.8G, Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2, Nikon SB700
Alexcarraquillophotogr​aphy.com
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/37823589@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tundraman
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:11 as a reply to  @ NewphotoMan's post |  #7

Very impressive. I love my 7D!


Canon stuff and lots of it SmugMug Coupon Code: 9Sst64IEj4uzk Save $5 Instantly!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skygod44
"in stockings and suspenders"
Avatar
6,454 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo!
     
Dec 09, 2009 21:11 as a reply to  @ NewphotoMan's post |  #8

Excellent post, and very encouraging....just need to get Xmas outta the way and I can put some pennies away for a 7D in 2010!


"Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
6D/7D and ALL Canon/Sigma gear SOLD!!!! Now: Olympus PEN EP-5 & OM-D EM-5 Mk2 and 8 lenses!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kosin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 11, 2009 08:50 as a reply to  @ skygod44's post |  #9

In this kind of situations having the ability to adjust the sensitivity of the AF is priceless...


Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JDCPA
Member
108 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2009
     
Dec 11, 2009 09:04 |  #10

Thanks for posting.

A good example of using the sloweer tracking speed. I have felt nervous using that, but your pics show it is the right answer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfibanez
Senior Member
Avatar
859 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Dec 11, 2009 09:29 |  #11

I wonder about the C.Fn III-3 setting at 0 (Main focus point priority). GIven what it says in the manual, I would have had it on 1 (Continuous AF track priority). With the setting at 0, the main focus point should have started focus on the trees rather than the bird. Perhaps it was the slower tracking speed that save the shot. Personally, I have found very hard to track fast moving BIFs with any tracking speed slower than the middle level.


5D4 | 7D2 | 11-24/4.0 L | 16-35/2.8 L III | 24/1.4 L II | 24-105/4.0 L IS | 40/2.8 STM | 85/1.2 L II | 100/2.8 L macro IS | 70-200/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 L IS II | 400/4.0 DO L II | 580EXII | EF 1.4x III | Gitzo monopod GM2541 | Gitzo tripod GT2541 | Really Right Stuff ball head & plates | B+W & Singh-Ray filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 11, 2009 09:53 |  #12

That's a pretty impressive test. I'm amazed that the focus kept tracking.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Dec 11, 2009 10:17 |  #13

cfibanez wrote in post #9176733 (external link)
Personally, I have found very hard to track fast moving BIFs with any tracking speed slower than the middle level.

It's not the tracking speed you set, it's the delay before it starts hunting for something else, if it looses focus. From 1 second at the slowest to 0.125 seconds at the fastest, if it uses the same timing as the 1D Mark IIn. I've not seen any data for the 7D.

In the example above, it could be that the branches in front of the bird were so far out of focus that the AF sensor didn't even see them.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kosin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 11, 2009 10:36 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #14

cfibanez wrote in post #9176733 (external link)
I wonder about the C.Fn III-3 setting at 0 (Main focus point priority). GIven what it says in the manual, I would have had it on 1 (Continuous AF track priority). With the setting at 0, the main focus point should have started focus on the trees rather than the bird. Perhaps it was the slower tracking speed that save the shot. Personally, I have found very hard to track fast moving BIFs with any tracking speed slower than the middle level.

That's correct. Slower tracking=>sensitivity is what saved these shots and that is exactly what it should do when another object "enters the frame". The extra AF points helped when the bird moved out of the center of the frame (center focusing point).


Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6767
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Dec 11, 2009 10:39 |  #15

Thanks for sharing
I'm surprise how well it did with the branches in the way.


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,625 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
7D AF tracking accuracy - accidental test
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
928 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.