When shooting in the studio environment I rotate between the 70-200 and 24-70 on my 5DmkII, It works perfectly for my needs.
agphotography Goldmember  3,726 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Orange County, CA More info | Dec 16, 2009 01:42 | #16 When shooting in the studio environment I rotate between the 70-200 and 24-70 on my 5DmkII, It works perfectly for my needs. -Abram-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful"  More info | I like my Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for its versatility.. My Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro for tight head shots and my Canon EF 50mm f/1.4.. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enrigonz Goldmember  1,637 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Dec 16, 2009 11:35 | #18 yogestee wrote in post #9207631  I like my Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for its versatility.. My Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro for tight head shots and my Canon EF 50mm f/1.4.. I hope I'm not hijacking this thread but I've been looking at the Tamron 28-75 myself, I read nothing but great reviews on it. Do you feel this lens needs OS/image stabilization when you shoot with it? I'm on the fence between the Tamron and the new Sigma 17-70mm with IS. Canon Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]  More info | Dec 16, 2009 11:46 | #19 Any focal length can benefit from IS, in letting you hand hold in low light. Longer FL benefit more from IS in masking your unsteadiness even at higher shutter speeds. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2009 14:19 | #20 Been out of pocket for a while and missed all the new replies. Wilt wrote in post #9209304 Any focal length can benefit from IS, in letting you hand hold in low light. Longer FL benefit more from IS in masking your unsteadiness even at higher shutter speeds. Enrigonzog, If we're talking studio, you've already lost half the reasons for needing IS. I used to have a sharp Tammy 28-75. Kinda wish I would have kept it. Never felt like it was lacking because it didn't have IS but I didi wish it was a little wider.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drisley "What a Tool I am"  9,002 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2002 More info | Dec 16, 2009 14:26 | #21 24-70 since I shoot mainly full body portraits indoors. EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agphotography Goldmember 3,726 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Orange County, CA More info | Dec 17, 2009 00:09 | #22 Wilt wrote in post #9209304 Any focal length can benefit from IS, in letting you hand hold in low light. Longer FL benefit more from IS in masking your unsteadiness even at higher shutter speeds. 'Need to have'...photographers have been shooting without IS for hundreds of years, so 'need' is relative. They used tripods more, before IS! I agree. I never use IS lenses, I've never suffered because of it. -Abram-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sfaust Goldmember  2,306 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2006 More info | Dec 17, 2009 00:28 | #23 Looking through my metadata on my past images, I find the 24-70 2.8L is my most used lens both in the studio and on location. Second would be the 85 1.2L, and next the 70-200 2.8L. Stephen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1649 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
|
