Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Dec 2009 (Friday) 17:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens for cycling

 
red ­ snapper
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Dec 11, 2009 17:19 |  #1

Hi all,

I am planning on renting a decent lens for the upcoming Tour Down Under cycling event in January and i was wondering what lens would be best. I was thinking 100-400 but I could also go with a 28-300. What does every one think?

red


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iqbal624
Goldmember
Avatar
1,574 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Washington State, USA
     
Dec 11, 2009 17:37 |  #2

What are you plning on taking pictures of on this tour? Two lenses an option?


5d2 | | 50L | 28 1.8 | |
MacBook Pro 15 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ snapper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Dec 11, 2009 17:42 |  #3

I've got my 17-70 for close and wider angle but I was looking for something with a bit of reach for when I can't get as close. There is a prologue on the Sunday and we will all be behind barriers. The rest of the time I'll be chasing them around the country side.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Dec 11, 2009 17:45 |  #4

You will want a lens that will focus quickly. I think the 100-400 would do best... But I really haven't ever used the 28-300.

Many years ago I shot the Red Zinger bike race with film camera and 80-200 zoom... seated backwards on a motorcycle behind the driver. It was pretty exciting.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Dec 11, 2009 20:22 |  #5

red snapper wrote in post #9179578 (external link)
Hi all,

I am planning on renting a decent lens for the upcoming Tour Down Under cycling event in January and i was wondering what lens would be best. I was thinking 100-400 but I could also go with a 28-300. What does every one think?

red

i use the 70-200L f4 IS. i've used it on 1.3, 1.6 and FF sensors :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevin ­ B
Senior Member
292 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 73
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
     
Dec 11, 2009 21:06 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #6

You might need a faster lens than the 100-400 to keep from getting blurred images due to the fast motion. You might consider a 70-200 f/2.8 so you can have much faster shutter speeds. On a crop camera, 70-200 gives a reasonable reach.


GEAR: 5D Mark III, 7D, 24-105L, 16-35 F/4L, 50 f/1.4, 100-400L II, 100 f/2.8 macro, Zeiss 21mm f/2.8, 1.4X III, Sigma 14mm F/1.8 Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iqbal624
Goldmember
Avatar
1,574 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Washington State, USA
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:09 |  #7

I second the 70-200 2.8 and I would spring for the IS model. Has is for panning...


5d2 | | 50L | 28 1.8 | |
MacBook Pro 15 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:57 |  #8

Definitely the 70-200 2.8L IS...


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emtp563
Goldmember
Avatar
1,490 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
     
Dec 12, 2009 03:06 |  #9

70-200L f/2.8, without question.


*cameras: Canon 1D Mark III | Canon 1D Mark II | Canon 1D "Classic" | Canon S95
*lenses: Canon 16-35L f/2.8 | Canon 24-70L f/2.8 | Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS | Canon 1.4x TC II
*accessories: Canon 580EX II/430EX | Quantum Turbo SC | CP-E4
http://www.cyclingcapt​ured.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/cyclingcaptured (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
Avatar
2,440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
     
Dec 12, 2009 05:39 |  #10

+1 for the 70-200 2.8 (IS)

You'll love the speed for higher shutterspeeds.
And on you 1.6 crop it'll have a great reach for your needs!


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
g3ck0
Member
223 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 12, 2009 08:44 |  #11

If you can get yourself very close to the riders, I've seen some very cool perspectives from a 10-22 :D


Canon 7D | 50 1.4 | 17-55 IS | 10-22 | 18-55 IS | 70-200 F4 IS | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joaaso
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Oslo, Norway
     
Dec 12, 2009 08:48 |  #12

Well it really depends on how close to the road you want to be.. We had a show-race here in Oslo this summer, with Lance, O'Grady, Hushovd, Arvesen, Pellizotti and bunch of other less know cyclists. I was mostly standing along the barriers and even though I used everything from 17mm to 250mm, I was mainly shooting at the wider angles, so if I were you I would make sure that your wide angle option is fast enough both regaring aperture and AF -cause these guys are moving insanely fast when you get close to the road..! In my case the race was late in the afternoon, close to the twilight hour and my 17-55 f2.8 became too slow pretty quickly as the light disappeared, so I ended up using my 30 f1.4 most of the time.. A fast telelens is also necessary for this kind of event and I actually purchased the 200 f2.8 prime as a direct consequence of my experience at that showrace.. Some pics from the showrace (external link)


aaso-photography (external link) | Flickr (external link)
5D Mk IV | 5D Mk II
EF 24-70/4L | EF 24-105/4L | Samyang 14/2.8 | TS-E 24/3.5L II | EF 35/1.4L II | EF 85/1.8 | EF 135/2L | EF 200/2.8L II | 1,4x TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ snapper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Dec 14, 2009 18:35 |  #13

Thanks all,

looks like the 70-200 2.8 IS will be the one.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,894 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Lens for cycling
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1582 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.