Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Dec 2009 (Friday) 22:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

what to buy first? LR or PS CS4?

 
jay415
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:16 |  #1

I am unsure which product I should start off with. I am currently using PSE 7 and I don't use it to it's full potential, but at the same time I find myself wanting features of CS4. A simple layer mask was a PIA in PSE until I found a neat little action to create a layer mask the right way. (http://graphicssoft.ab​out.com …ents/qt/layerma​sktool.htm (external link)) Even though I am just learning I find my self wanting to tinker with channels and other things that PSE doesn't have... I watch tutorials to learn and can't try much because they don't apply to PSE. Now on the other hand I have been playing around with LR 3 beta and LR 2 trial and find that so much can be done to a RAW photo prior to photoshop. I know ACR 5.5 added features similar to LR like painting in settings where needed but it seems easier to do in LR. I also you PSE organizer to sort and tag my 19,000+ photos, so I may not necessarily use LR for organization although LR does have very good Metadata search capabilities. I am strictly a hobbyist so neither product is a need, plus I still have a lot to learn. I was planning to wait for LR 3 to come out and take advantage of the free beta. (If I go the LR route) Otherwise l am hoping Adobe offers a $299 upgrade for PSE users like they did the last 2 years.( of course I missed that boat, found out too late) I would love to hear what you guys and gals think?


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kafn8td
Senior Member
Avatar
864 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Minnesooooooota
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:41 |  #2

Have you downloaded the trials of both and played with them? LR2 did nothing for me, but I have been using the LR3 trial and like it. Bridge in PS CS4 is much improved.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay415
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:47 |  #3

Kafn8td wrote in post #9181159 (external link)
Have you downloaded the trials of both and played with them? LR2 did nothing for me, but I have been using the LR3 trial and like it. Bridge in PS CS4 is much improved.

yea I am using both LR2 trial and LR3 beta and I also installed CS4 trial but only have 13 days left :sad: I want to get what I'll use more often and I am unsure at this point.. I have been leaning towards LR but I'd wait till LR3 was released first. and by the time it does come out I will probably change my mind 10 times


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2009 22:53 |  #4

PS4 includes Bridge, which does many of the things that Lightroom does. LR is cheaper. It really depends if you need to do pixel level editing.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Dec 12, 2009 10:54 |  #5

Lightroom is more a digital asset management tool with editing capabilities. CS4 is a heavy duty editing tool. The complement one another.
Eventually you should use both. It may be useful to go to the Luminous Landscape site and check out the tutorial on digital asset management capabilities http://store.luminous-landscape.com …o&cPath=2&produ​cts_id=225 (external link)

There is also a good tutorial on Lightroom.

If you are serious about photography and managing your digital images you will eventually want both.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Dec 12, 2009 10:57 |  #6

Don't forget that there are versions of previous Photoshops still for sale at a fraction of the original price. Very useful if you don't need the very latest gimmicks.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay415
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 12, 2009 14:55 |  #7

I was curious to see which program people used more often, but it seems like from everything I read they are usually used together, starting in LR and finishing in PS.

dmward wrote in post #9183149 (external link)
Lightroom is more a digital asset management tool with editing capabilities. CS4 is a heavy duty editing tool. The complement one another.
Eventually you should use both. It may be useful to go to the Luminous Landscape site and check out the tutorial on digital asset management capabilities http://store.luminous-landscape.com …o&cPath=2&produ​cts_id=225 (external link)

There is also a good tutorial on Lightroom.

If you are serious about photography and managing your digital images you will eventually want both.

I'll check it out, and yes I will eventually end up with both. I guess I should start with Lightroom since I already have Photoshop Elements. Then later I can upgrade to CS4 when I can get a deal.

Lowner wrote in post #9183165 (external link)
Don't forget that there are versions of previous Photoshops still for sale at a fraction of the original price. Very useful if you don't need the very latest gimmicks.

I was looking for an old version, but I couldn't find any. Then I'd be able to upgrade to the newer versions at a discount.


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Dec 12, 2009 15:04 |  #8

jay415 wrote in post #9184177 (external link)
I was curious to see which program people used more often, but it seems like from everything I read they are usually used together, starting in LR and finishing in PS.

No necessarily. Lightroom is a Raw converter and Digital Asset Management tool. If you don't shoot large amounts of RAW images you will find that Lightroom is of limited usefulness to you. With the exception of two features, all the functionality of Lightroom is also built into Adobe Bridge which ships with Photoshop.

There are lots of photographers who work exclusively in Adobe Bridge/Photoshop.

I'll check it out, and yes I will eventually end up with both. I guess I should start with Lightroom since I already have Photoshop Elements. Then later I can upgrade to CS4 when I can get a deal.

I was looking for an old version, but I couldn't find any. Then I'd be able to upgrade to the newer versions at a discount.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay415
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 12, 2009 15:10 |  #9

PixelMagic wrote in post #9184225 (external link)
No necessarily. Lightroom is a Raw converter and Digital Asset Management tool. If you don't shoot large amounts of RAW images you will find that Lightroom is of limited usefulness to you. With the exception of two features, all the functionality of Lightroom is also built into Adobe Bridge which ships with Photoshop.

There are lots of photographers who work exclusively in Adobe Bridge/Photoshop.

I guess I should check out bridge before my trial runs out. At least I'll have an idea of the differences. I recently started shooting RAW, I love the flexibility of editing.


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Dec 12, 2009 15:23 |  #10

jay415 wrote in post #9184261 (external link)
I guess I should check out bridge before my trial runs out. At least I'll have an idea of the differences. I recently started shooting RAW, I love the flexibility of editing.

i've seen sone very good photographers who use LR only. if i were to use just one program it would probably be LR.

i also use CS3 for some things like resizing and sharpening and cloning. basically the final touches.

like someone else said you can use LR with older versions of PS and elements because LR is your raw converter.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay415
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 12, 2009 16:27 |  #11

besides organization, based strictly on RAW editing can Lightroom do anything that ACR 5.5 can't do? Certain features I didn't think ACR had and I found out it does. (like the Targeted Adjustment Tool)


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MarkoPolo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,203 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Greeley, Colorado
     
Dec 12, 2009 17:40 |  #12

I purchased both at the same time (had CS2 before). I must say that now that I have gotten over the learning curve, I really like Lightroom. I probably do 85-90% of my image editing in Lightroom and use CS4 for only a few things. Clone and patch tool, mostly, but occasionally Shadow/highlight, smart sharpen and noise reduction. Also, the save to web with the specific size limit I use all the time to size photos for POTN and other web sites. Having said that, I would go with Lightroom and if budget is important, get a cheaper copy of CS3. I still don't have much use for bridge-too slow and with Lightroom you really don't need it much.


Mark

Olympus OM-D E-M1 pro body, M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 Pro lens, M.Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED SWD lens, M. Zuiko EC-14 1.4 Teleconverter, M. Zuiko 60mm f/2.8 Macro lens, M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 lens, M. Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II lens, Canon 400mm f/5.6 L lens with Canon to OLympus converter, Nissin Di-466 Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Dec 12, 2009 17:58 |  #13

Apart from digital asset management, there are two things Lightroom can do and Bridge/Photoshop cannot:
1. Match Total Exposures
2. Virtual Copies

Other than those two features, the functionality in terms of RAW development is identical.

So it all boils down to whether you need to manage a large amount of RAW files, have tight deadlines, etc.

And while I've been a Lightroom user and supporter even before the first betas were publicly available, Bridge/Photoshop can do everything Lightroom does but the reverse isn't true. I have yet to see anyone select a pixel in Lightroom.

jay415 wrote in post #9184646 (external link)
besides organization, based strictly on RAW editing can Lightroom do anything that ACR 5.5 can't do? Certain features I didn't think ACR had and I found out it does. (like the Targeted Adjustment Tool)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Dec 12, 2009 17:59 |  #14

jay415,

There are several adverts around on the net, old stock of CS2 for example at £100-£200. Whether thats low enough to make it worth it for a discount on CS4 I don't know.

I'm still using PS7 perfectly happily. The only thing it lacks for me is the ability to use my sharpening plug-in at 16 bit, because layers will only work in 8 bit.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay415
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Dec 13, 2009 15:03 as a reply to  @ Lowner's post |  #15

I was using LR 2 trial today and imported about 45 photos just doing minor white balance, exposure, and some brush and gradient exposures. I noticed each time I went to the next picture it seems to get ever so slightly slower and it finally just hung up about 20 pictures in. I had to force close LR. I wonder if I should just upgrade my PC first. (It has been almost 4 years since I've done that :()

P4 3.0 ghz
2 gb ram

dual monitors on
ASUS EN6600/TD/256 GeForce 6600 256MB 128-bit DDR PCI Express x16 Video Card


Canon 50D | Canon XTI | Canon 18-55mm (Kit) | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 430 EX II | Canon 430 EX
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,908 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
what to buy first? LR or PS CS4?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
920 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.