Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 13 Dec 2009 (Sunday) 07:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Microadjustment and the 7D

 
weeman750
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
     
Dec 13, 2009 07:25 |  #1

I note with interest that several people have had to microadjust some of their lenses when using them on the 7D. I am curious as to how much adjustment each person has had to make on the -20 to +20 scale and for which lens.
Is there an amount you would consider excessive, i.e. +20.


Colin.
www.colinspics.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,997 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46900
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 13, 2009 07:38 |  #2

Hi Colin

I think in general it is benificial to MA, rather than necessary.

I found in general most lenses on the 7D benifited from a +1 to +5 adjustment with on at +10.

All these lenses were fine on the 20D which could not MA.

A hint if you are trying to MA and finding very large adjustments seem needed, try repeating the test further away (50X the focal lenghth at least). I found some non-L lenses were inconsistant at close distances and this could give over readings if trying to MA.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Dec 13, 2009 08:16 |  #3

Colin,
Also keep in mind that while the 50x focal lenght rule is a good start, it's best to microadjust your lenses at a subject distance that you use that particular lens the most.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 13, 2009 09:57 |  #4

All but one of myu lenses benefited from MFA. The were all in the 0 to +10 range with the 100-400 needing the most at +10. 100mm and 17-55 were +5 and i can't remember all the others but they were in that range as well. On my 50D it was similar, the 100-400 neede +10 there as well.

I have noticed that the shorter focal length lenses are much more difficult to MFA and a change in value is much less noticeable. With the long lenses a change in just a few increments is very noticeable.

I have also given up on shooting the inclined plane focus chart and have had much better and more consistent results shooting a standard flat focus chart. It wont tell you which way to adjust and you have to take several pics and interpolate the offset, but finding the sweet spot is much easier. THis is a pic of my 100-400 with no adjustment and with an adjustment of +10. I also have a +15 and +20 and the +20 shot looks almost identical to the no offset shot. :) If you look at the bars and numbers it's hard to tell the differance but if you look at the resolution strip, one MFA value clearly stands out from another.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2662/4151855506_94a5f719c8_o.jpg

Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Dec 13, 2009 10:07 |  #5

Just be aware that with zoom lenses, you'll get two different values, one at each extreme. I always write them on a piece of painter's blue tape that I stick on the back of the camera. If I know I'm shooting toward the long end of the zoom range, I set the MA for the long extreme, and vice versa.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Dec 13, 2009 10:19 |  #6

Just be aware that with zoom lenses, you'll get two different values, one at each extreme. I always write them on a piece of painter's blue tape that I stick on the back of the camera. If I know I'm shooting toward the long end of the zoom range, I set the MA for the long extreme, and vice versa.

VERY good point, that's my experience too, and I too made notes of MFA at the min and max FL of my zoom lenses.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Dec 13, 2009 10:57 |  #7

tvphotog wrote in post #9188238 (external link)
Just be aware that with zoom lenses, you'll get two different values, one at each extreme. I always write them on a piece of painter's blue tape that I stick on the back of the camera. If I know I'm shooting toward the long end of the zoom range, I set the MA for the long extreme, and vice versa.

Can you do a custom setting that includes this so you can quickly and easily switch?


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Dec 13, 2009 11:12 |  #8

jgrussell wrote in post #9188504 (external link)
Can you do a custom setting that includes this so you can quickly and easily switch?

Yes. C.Fn III: Autofocus/Drive. That's how I do it.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,997 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46900
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 14, 2009 01:56 |  #9

gjl711 wrote in post #9188182 (external link)
I have also given up on shooting the inclined plane focus chart and have had much better and more consistent results shooting a standard flat focus chart. It wont tell you which way to adjust and you have to take several pics and interpolate the offset, but finding the sweet spot is much easier.

+1 in fact I resorted to using my SRF/MTF lens test software to make it easier to compare multiple focus operations.

I found the sloping chart method very confussing and unreliable, this was perhaps me but whatever works.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Dec 14, 2009 01:58 |  #10

tvphotog wrote in post #9188596 (external link)
Yes. C.Fn III: Autofocus/Drive. That's how I do it.

Can you elaborate on what you mean?

I am not aware of any short cuts???


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ C
Goldmember
Avatar
2,088 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2005
Location: N.Devon, UK
     
Dec 14, 2009 02:25 |  #11

I frequently use a 300/2.8 + 2x tc for bird photography, what method of MA would you guys advise for this set-up? I was thinking about setting up some kind of target from around 30-40 feet and taking a series of of shots at different MA settings with the camera/lens mounted on a tripod - would this be the way to go?


TOP BIRD SHOTS (external link)
MY PHOTOSTREAM (external link)

500px gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,997 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46900
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 14, 2009 02:51 as a reply to  @ post 9193392 |  #12

Is that your typical working distance Roy?

I would suggest trying your typical distance and move further back if results are inconsistant.

I found the 200/2.8 + 2X was consistant at much less than 50X focal length.

I tried to do all my test indoors to avoid wind vibration issues on the target, which would tend to act like a sail. I think that is the main issue with a large and thus outside range for longer lenses.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ C
Goldmember
Avatar
2,088 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2005
Location: N.Devon, UK
     
Dec 14, 2009 02:54 |  #13

Lester Wareham wrote in post #9193392 (external link)
Is that your typical working distance Roy?

I tried to do all my test indoors to avoid wind vibration issues on the target, which would tend to act like a sail. I think that is the main issue with a large and thus outside range for longer lenses.

I take your point about wind Lester, I guess if doing a test outdoors you would need a calm day.
The trouble with birds is that the typical distance would be anywhere between 20-100 feet depending on the size of the bird (and how near I can get). Would it make sense to use the two extreme distances and average the results?


TOP BIRD SHOTS (external link)
MY PHOTOSTREAM (external link)

500px gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
32,997 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46900
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 14, 2009 03:10 |  #14

Roy C wrote in post #9193415 (external link)
I take your point about wind Lester, I guess if doing a test outdoors you would need a calm day.
The trouble with birds is that the typical distance would be anywhere between 20-100 feet depending on the size of the bird (and how near I can get). Would it make sense to use the two extreme distances and average the results?

I found it difficult to get a clear MA effect at much longer distances, but for 600mm 50x focal length is of course 100ft.

I tended to bias towards my closest working distance and use the minimum adjustment I could. For longer distances and infity I just checked for consistancy using live view.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Dec 14, 2009 03:14 |  #15

there no easy way for us Birders Roy as we get big birds close and distant, and the same with small birds
I set my 500 at about 60/70ft ,dof is greater the further away from your subject and most birds are indeed further away, i just think the above gives the best overall MA for real life shots.
Also when a birds close say 20/30ft away its easyier to see you have your focus point on the eye SO after setting MA as above i just check its not a mile out on a close subject .ie a some clear writeing on a box at around 30ft away.
best to use a remote, fast shutter, tripod, to rule out camera shake when doing the MA.

Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,814 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Microadjustment and the 7D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is bzguy
1388 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.