Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 14 Dec 2009 (Monday) 23:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

so a little bird tells me today about ....

 
Eiro
Goldmember
1,368 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2009
Location: U.S.
     
Dec 14, 2009 23:17 |  #1

that EFS lenses will screw your 5d up even if you put it on just once and take a few pics...

but I dont believe thats true, I've take a few snap shots with my 10-22 on my 5d classic before (havent tried it on mk2) and they came out all messed up but it didnt mess up the camera in anyways, I threw on my L after that it worked just fine....


so what is this rumor which I'm sure has been covered already before, but let me reprise the commentary with this Q?


Get out and shoot

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
g3ck0
Member
223 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 14, 2009 23:22 |  #2

EF-S stands for short back focus. For some lenses, if you zoom in/out too much, you are going to hit the mirror thus damaging your camera.


Canon 7D | 50 1.4 | 17-55 IS | 10-22 | 18-55 IS | 70-200 F4 IS | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eiro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,368 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2009
Location: U.S.
     
Dec 14, 2009 23:31 |  #3

g3ck0 wrote in post #9199637 (external link)
EF-S stands for short back focus. For some lenses, if you zoom in/out too much, you are going to hit the mirror thus damaging your camera.

:D bingoooo


Get out and shoot

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crowflyawa
Senior Member
458 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 15, 2009 01:13 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

the EF-S lenses have a rubber boot to keep the mirror form hitting the metal in the rear mount.
This is no guarentee you cant damage something though.

I tested a few EF-S lenses onto my camera also and alsothe Sigma 55-150, it worrked fine.
I had no issue at all, but all my images had a black circle around them as expected
on my 5D FF camera with a crop format lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eiro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,368 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2009
Location: U.S.
     
Dec 15, 2009 01:29 |  #5

crowflyawa wrote in post #9200217 (external link)
the EF-S lenses have a rubber boot to keep the mirror form hitting the metal in the rear mount.
This is no guarentee you cant damage something though.

I tested a few EF-S lenses onto my camera also and alsothe Sigma 55-150, it worrked fine.
I had no issue at all, but all my images had a black circle around them as expected
on my 5D FF camera with a crop format lens.

yep thats what happened with I took my 17-35 and used it on my ff


Get out and shoot

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crimzon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 405
Joined May 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Dec 15, 2009 04:06 as a reply to  @ Eiro's post |  #6

Isn't putting an EF-S lens on a 5d, like putting Walmart tires on your BMW anyway?


My blog (external link)

Always feel free to provide constructive criticism to any of my pics.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Dec 15, 2009 05:11 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Aren't BMW tires made by bridgestone? I think I've seen bridgestone at walmart...and everywhere else :roll:


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
n1as
Goldmember
2,330 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Salem, OR
     
Dec 15, 2009 05:33 |  #8

I tried to mount several EF-S lenses on my 5D and 1D but they wouldn't even mount? Maybe I was 10 degrees off in rotation or something?

My Tokina 11-16 worked just fine on the 1D but I'd be very cautious about putting ANY EF-S lenses on a larger-than-1.6-crop body.


- Keith
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 619
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 15, 2009 05:41 |  #9

Eiro wrote in post #9199606 (external link)
that EFS lenses will screw your 5d up even if you put it on just once and take a few pics...

but I dont believe thats true, I've take a few snap shots with my 10-22 on my 5d classic before (havent tried it on mk2) and they came out all messed up but it didnt mess up the camera in anyways, I threw on my L after that it worked just fine....

so what is this rumor which I'm sure has been covered already before, but let me reprise the commentary with this Q?

Can you take a photo of the back end of your 10-22? It sounds like someone modified it.

A stock EF_S lens physically cannot be mounted on a non-EF-S body.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crowflyawa
Senior Member
458 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 15, 2009 07:18 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

JeffreyG wrote in post #9200807 (external link)
A stock EF_S lens physically cannot be mounted on a non-EF-S body.

That is incorrect.

I have and other people have also mounted EF-S lenses on 5D and 5D MKII cameras.
Some people have mixed results, and it is a risk and not recommended.
But it can work fine too.

The sigma 50-150 is a good example of one i mounted on my 5D and took shots. want me to post the pics with exif?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Dec 15, 2009 07:29 |  #11

The 10-22 has a plastic baffle on the rear that can be popped off without damaging it. It can then be mounted on a FF, except that the lens will vignette badly at < 15mm. Apparently it will interfere with the mirror at 10mm. I haven't tried it at less than 11-12 and although it vignettes badly, it clears the mirror.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Dec 15, 2009 07:35 |  #12

Originally Posted by JeffreyG
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'
A stock EF_S lens physically cannot be mounted on a non-EF-S body.

crowflyawa wrote in post #9201076 (external link)
That is incorrect.

I don't think you should call 3rd party lenses EF-S. So I think that statement IS correct.

Canon EF-S lenses need to be modified in order to mount on a FF camera. On many EF-S lenses this is done by simply sticking a finger into the rear opening and popping out the little plastic piece that prevents the lens from fitting to a FF. On others (18-55) you need to cut off the protrusion as it is physically part of the plastic mount.

Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, etc, use a standard EF mount and will of course mount on any FF camera. I don't believe there are any 3rd party lenses that have the rear element protruding past the rear of the mount, so there is no risk of damage and no need or the EF-S style mount.

Canon EF-S lenses often have the rear element protruding past the rear edge of the mount and will hit the mirror at wide focal lengths.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 15, 2009 07:37 |  #13

JeffreyG wrote in post #9200807 (external link)
A stock EF-S lens physically cannot be mounted on a non-EF-S body.

Quite true

crowflyawa wrote in post #9201076 (external link)
That is incorrect.

I have and other people have also mounted EF-S lenses on 5D and 5D MKII cameras.
Some people have mixed results, and it is a risk and not recommended.
But it can work fine too.

The sigma 50-150 is a good example of one i mounted on my 5D and took shots. want me to post the pics with exif?

Crow, your statements are incorrect. However, I do believe that you are confusing something.

First off, a Sigma (or any other third-party) "digital only" lens is NOT an EF-S mount lens. They will mount on any Canon EF-mount camera, though there will be a lot of vignetting, etc.

Canon EF-S mount lenses CANNOT be mounted on cameras not designed to accept them without modification of the lens. If one modifies the mount of an EF-S lens and uses it on other bodies, there is very definitely a risk of crashing the camera's mirror into the rear element of the lens when the lens is used at some focal lengths.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Dec 15, 2009 07:57 |  #14

crowflyawa wrote in post #9201076 (external link)
That is incorrect.

No it's not.

3rd party lens manufacturers don't use the EF-S mount, they use a standard EF mount, even if it can only be used on a crop body.

Canon EF-S lenses can only be used on the 7d, the Rebel cameras, and the 20/30/40/50D's.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 619
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 15, 2009 18:05 |  #15

OP specifically referred to a '10-22' lens, and only Canon make such. The Canon EF-S 10-22 will not physically mount to a 5D unless the rear baffle is tampered with.

3rd party lens companies make small format only lenses (like the Sigma 10-20) and these lenses will physically mount to a 5D but they only provide partial coverage of the sensor.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,585 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
so a little bird tells me today about ....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
666 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.