Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Dec 2009 (Wednesday) 00:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3000 foot fall and still working

 
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Dec 16, 2009 00:29 |  #1

And its a rebel, not even a 1 series.

Didn't see this posted yet so...

http://gizmodo.com …amera-and-lens-still-work (external link)


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zelseman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,922 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Tahlequah, OK
     
Dec 16, 2009 00:50 |  #2

I almost dont believe this.
3000 ft. is a long fall
If it fell into some kind of a marsh-like substance the body would get wet and fry. Anything else should have shattered it to peices.
Maybe he just dropped it in mud and went with it.


Gear List
Website (external link)/Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zachbreaux
Goldmember
Avatar
1,154 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Memphis/Baton Rouge
     
Dec 16, 2009 01:00 |  #3

Yeah that is extremely hard to believe...The impact of that thing hitting the ground from 3k ft would have been tremendous.


My Gear |flickr (external link) |facebook fan page (external link) | zachbreaux.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cccc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,017 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 174
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Dec 16, 2009 01:10 |  #4

it could happen.

A helmet with a camera can create alot of drag... the light weight of the system combined with large surface area could have slowed it sufficiently.

if it hit a branch and its kinetic energy was converted into rotational energy, that would slow the cameras speed. If the helmet landed in mud, the impact time would be lengthened.

definitely a possibility.

COOL STORY!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zachbreaux
Goldmember
Avatar
1,154 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Memphis/Baton Rouge
     
Dec 16, 2009 01:12 |  #5

The post said that the body "fell off" of his helmet.


My Gear |flickr (external link) |facebook fan page (external link) | zachbreaux.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
speedline_fc
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: So Cal
     
Dec 16, 2009 01:38 |  #6

More pictures and "story" here.. and the guy's friend (who sold him the Rebel) said he might have video from the camcorder posted soon

http://www.fredmiranda​.com/forum/topic/84560​2 (external link)


My Flickr (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9822373#p​ost9822373

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Dec 16, 2009 02:08 |  #7

I don't know what is so hard to believe. It is just a little fall.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Avatar
1,122 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: CA
     
Dec 16, 2009 02:12 |  #8

I have a really hard time believing that the LCD screen was completely intact after striking the ground at 100 mph. My friend accidentally took a Cybershot on the X ride at Six Flags and after the end of the ride there was a crack in the LCD screen.


Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνη (external link), God of War

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JayStar86
Goldmember
Avatar
3,531 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: VanCity, BC
     
Dec 16, 2009 02:13 |  #9

i sort of dont believe it... the impact of a 3000 foot fall should have blown it into so many bits and pieces that you wouldn't be able to recognize that those pieces were of a camera if fallen on a hard surface. Now on a soft surface like grass or something maybe not to that extent but even then the sheer force of impact from such a high fall should have still crushed it if it hit soft grass.... it would truly take the perfect set of circumstances and angles and what not for this thing to have survived.... I think we need to send this story to the "mythbusters" lol and see what they come up with!


---Jay---
Gear and Feedback
flikr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zachbreaux
Goldmember
Avatar
1,154 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Memphis/Baton Rouge
     
Dec 16, 2009 02:26 |  #10

^great idea!


My Gear |flickr (external link) |facebook fan page (external link) | zachbreaux.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headshotzx
Goldmember
Avatar
4,488 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Dec 16, 2009 02:31 |  #11

Agreed. Let Buster do the test ;)


Zexun | Flickr (external link) | YouTube (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PaulB
Goldmember
1,543 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
     
Dec 16, 2009 03:29 as a reply to  @ Headshotzx's post |  #12

So everyone (well not everyone but......) will believe the , " I never take my CF card out but a pin bent itself into a knot...", stories but won't accept that a camera can survive a fall into soft ground.

If you search a bit you will find the full story.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ETERNAL
Senior Member
272 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
     
Dec 16, 2009 03:35 |  #13

I don't believe it. Even looking past the fact it works, has anyone here ever went sky diving?

You do not fall straight down on your decent. If you dropped a camera, or any object from over a half mile up, you would never ever find it. The search area for it would be MILES wide. And judging where you were when it fell off, after finishing your decent and you landing miles from the camera. Securing your gear, gathering your chute, finding a vehicle to hop in and then judging where you were in the air to find where it might have hit on the ground, just seems non believeable.

Then add in the picture looks to be taken on a table. Who really spends that time looking for a camera to take it somewhere and take a picture of it without knocking (accidentally or purposely) some of the loose strands of grass off of it?


Canon 7D...28-135mm IS...70-300mm...and a desire for a lot more...with a wallet that does not fit that desire...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5Dmaniac
Goldmember
Avatar
1,303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Dec 16, 2009 06:48 |  #14

No way this is true. 3000ft drop? I don't care how soft the landing site was, there is no way that Rebel would have survived. This has hoax written all over it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
runninmann
what the heck do I know?
Avatar
8,156 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Michigan-U.S.A.
     
Dec 16, 2009 06:59 |  #15

I believe it. Probably a one-in-a-very large number occurrence, but every once in awhile, you hear about people or things improbably surviving long falls. This could just be one of those improbable times.


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,126 views & 0 likes for this thread, 47 members have posted to it.
3000 foot fall and still working
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1082 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.