It is a second source so all we know is that it fell of the helmet. Maybe it fell of the helmet closer to the ground...
mikeassk Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:10 | #31 It is a second source so all we know is that it fell of the helmet. Maybe it fell of the helmet closer to the ground...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IVIax Goldmember 1,141 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Metro DC, USA More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:13 | #32 mikeassk wrote in post #9210743 It is a second source so all we know is that it fell of the helmet. Maybe it fell of the helmet closer to the ground... Assessing the extent of the damage, factoring in the earths rotation, terminal velocity, acceleration, air resistance, wind, elevation and damage to the video camera. I'd estimate 2.74 feet onto a soft surface. -Max
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sfordphoto Goldmember 2,564 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:21 | #33 |
tvphotog Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:25 | #34 That camera and lens are worth a whole lot to Canon as a publicity hook. But that's the height of three stacked 100-story buildings. I would like to see a video of the event, it's a bit hard to believe. Maybe if it hit a haystack sitting on a trampoline. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:25 | #35 lol at people not believing this could happen Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IVIax Goldmember 1,141 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Metro DC, USA More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:27 | #36 mikekelley wrote in post #9210849 lol at people not believing this could happen probably not normal, but far from as impossible as you're all making it sound If I'm included in the "lot of people", then my post was a joke. -Max
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charliec Senior Member 524 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:36 | #37 mikeassk wrote in post #9210743 It is a second source so all we know is that it fell of the helmet. Maybe it fell of the helmet closer to the ground... Still second-hand source but a bit closer...http://cielphoto.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deadpass Goldmember 3,353 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: phoenix, az More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:42 | #38 A rebel with a kit lens doesn't weight very much at all, not to mention it's not very sleek so I'm sure the terminal velocity for it is quite low. So 3000 or 20ft (est) into muddy grass is going to have the same impact. Now even 20ft is hard to believe but it's not impossible. a camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2009 15:43 | #39 The owner had probably bought one of the excellent My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Perfect_10 Goldmember 1,998 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2004 Location: An Ex Brit living in Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 16, 2009 15:43 | #40 IVIax wrote in post #9210759 Assessing the extent of the damage, factoring in the earths rotation, terminal velocity, acceleration, air resistance, wind, elevation and damage to the video camera. I'd estimate 2.74 feet onto a soft surface. ![]() You forgot to factor in the height of the guy it fell off .. was he 5'2 or 6'2 .. that could make your calculation out by around 30% ..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2009 15:49 | #41 Looking back at the photo that looks like wet sand on the camera. Sand could be about as soft as you can get (relatively). Also a **** to clean off though so its not all good. My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndersÖstberg Goldmember 3,395 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Sweden More info | Dec 16, 2009 16:00 | #42 zachbreaux wrote in post #9207085 The post said that the body "fell off" of his helmet. And, as was pointed out at another site, maybe this is the real story here. The camera plate simply should not have come off the helmet, this could have killed someone on the ground. Who cares about the camera... Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Dec 16, 2009 17:44 | #43 JayStar86 wrote in post #9207247 i sort of dont believe it... the impact of a 3000 foot fall should have blown it into so many bits and pieces that you wouldn't be able to recognize that those pieces were of a camera if fallen on a hard surface. Now on a soft surface like grass or something maybe not to that extent but even then the sheer force of impact from such a high fall should have still crushed it if it hit soft grass.... it would truly take the perfect set of circumstances and angles and what not for this thing to have survived.... I think we need to send this story to the "mythbusters" lol and see what they come up with! Indeed, and keep in mind there are documented cases of people surviving from 20,000 foot and up falls and living [A russian in WW2 for instance, as well as the one that survived in the back of a plane after it broke up..which Mythbusters covered] Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kompakt Member 232 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Dec 16, 2009 20:15 | #44 if this guy can servive, then that camera can servive! canon 50D /18 -55.is/ 55-250.IS/ 50mm f1.8 II ( nifty fifty)/ canon 430ex speedlite/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LaniKai "blissfully unaware" 2,136 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Connecticut More info | Dec 17, 2009 01:27 | #45 My friend dropped a Nikon D3 last weekend from a height of about 5 feet onto concrete, and I think it looks worse than the XT shown here. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1082 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||