Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Dec 2009 (Thursday) 10:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

time to switch

 
rebelling_lemming
Member
82 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Dec 17, 2009 10:46 |  #1

right, the time has come for me to change from my 40d, in all honesty i have no idea what to look at and am hoping you folks can help me.

basically im studying photography at college and shoot a lot in my spare time in low light, such as at gigs, and night photography. iv heard that full frame cameras are better in low light. im looking for cameras around the 7d price range.

cheers, phil




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Genome
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 17, 2009 10:49 |  #2

if you really want increased low light performance then yes go full frame.

As a side what lenses do you currently own and what ISO do you tend to shoot at?


Flickr (external link)
In the bag:
Canon 500D Tamron 17-50 f2.8 Canon 70-200L f4 Jessops 2x converter Jessops 360 Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 17, 2009 10:51 |  #3

rebelling_lemming wrote in post #9215859 (external link)
.... im looking for cameras around the 7d price range.

cheers, phil

If your looking at a camera in the 7D price range, heck, get the 7D. It has better low light capability than the 40 and many improved features as well. It's a very sweet camera.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Dec 17, 2009 11:03 |  #4

I don't know, I'd spring for the 5D2 if I could. The 5D is a fantastic classic and can be found now use, at our Selling forum here, one at www.keh.com (external link) which is highly respected, and at the refurbished departments of Adorama aned B&H Photo.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14914
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 17, 2009 11:09 |  #5

I have a 40d and recently picked up a full frame 5D. I love the 5D, low light performance is better, although still not phenomenal in my opinion. One thing you would notice is that the 5D is an older camera, not particularly feature laden, and I dont think the autofocus is up to the 40d. That said its a great camera, just a little more methodical to work with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Dec 17, 2009 11:10 |  #6

rebelling_lemming wrote in post #9215859 (external link)
right, the time has come for me to change from my 40d, in all honesty i have no idea what to look at and am hoping you folks can help me.

basically im studying photography at college and shoot a lot in my spare time in low light, such as at gigs, and night photography. iv heard that full frame cameras are better in low light. im looking for cameras around the 7d price range.

cheers, phil

Is it time to switch because you have money or because you have a problem or need you want to adress with new gear?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anthony11
Goldmember
Avatar
2,148 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Dec 17, 2009 11:50 |  #7
bannedPermanently

rebelling_lemming wrote in post #9215859 (external link)
iv heard that full frame cameras are better in low light. im looking for cameras around the 7d price range.

For a given sensor technology, larger photosites tend to perform better than smaller photosites. Crop-frame cameras tend to have smaller photosites to jack up the total number of pixels.

I have a 5D2. Were I starting from scratch today and sticking with Canon, I'd go with 7D instead in a heartbeat.


5D2, 24-105L, 85mm f/1.8, MP960, HG21, crumbling G6+R72, Brownian toddler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kuma
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: The Igloo spirit remains
     
Dec 17, 2009 11:59 as a reply to  @ anthony11's post |  #8

Hows about some nice low light glass?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nyc2sd
Senior Member
Avatar
368 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego CA
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:07 |  #9

If you don't know what you want in your next camera, then it sounds like it's not the right time. Open a savings account with the money until it is the right time


Canon 70D, 580EXII, 16-35mk 2.8IIL, 50 1.4, 70-200 F2.8 ISL
Webmaster at The Millionaire Car Club (external link) -
My FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markol
Senior Member
841 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:14 |  #10

Older 5Ds are extremely affordable given what they cost upon release, but it is an older camera. The 5DII is pretty darn sweet but a bit more than the 7D. The 7D is decent at high ISO given its crop sensor. Have you considered the 7D?


www.borrowlenses.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
laydros
Senior Member
Avatar
444 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:19 |  #11

I haven't used higher end cameras much, but I think you have a lot of camera in a 40D. I am really interested in art photography and I'm really wanting a FF camera right now to get the added depth of field and better low light performance. But it has been tough to come up with the scratch for it because there really isn't a ton of difference. The 5D Mk II will get you full frame DOF, high ISO (a couple of stops better than the 40D), and the 7D will give you about a stop better high ISO, and upgrades in things like build quality/weather sealing, and AF. If you are shooting sports or wildlife the 7D would be an improvement. If you are shooting art or portraits/weddings the 5D Mk II would be an improvement. However neither is going to be a HUGE jump from the 40D, some red rings might be more worthwhile.

The 5D might be an option, but like said above, you have to bear in mind that you are taking a step backwards in technology. Older menu, no dust reduction, etc.


Jason Hamilton - flickr (external link) - Twitter (external link) - laydros.org (external link)
Canon 5D, 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 USM, 35 f/2, 50 f/1.8 II, 85mm f/1.8 USM, 70-210 f/3.5-4.5 USM, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 430EX
Nikon FE, 35/2, 50/1.8, 105/2.5 and Mamiya C220 Complete Gear List.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
braidkid
Senior Member
Avatar
371 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:28 as a reply to  @ laydros's post |  #12

What does the 40D not do that you wish it did? What is your glass?

I'll get flamed for saying this, but don't expect the 7D to perform much better than your 40D in low light. I wouldn't buy a 7D for it's ISO performance, get a full frame if you want better low light performance. You can get a 5Dii for around $2k if you look. Otherwise, you may consider a 5D classic which are going for around $1200 used these days.


5Dii, 16-35 f4L, 50f1.4, 580ex II, 430ex II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/braidkid/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ferrari_Alex
Goldmember
Avatar
1,787 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:28 |  #13

rebelling_lemming wrote in post #9215859 (external link)
right, the time has come for me to change from my 40d, in all honesty i have no idea what to look at and am hoping you folks can help me.

basically im studying photography at college and shoot a lot in my spare time in low light, such as at gigs, and night photography. iv heard that full frame cameras are better in low light. im looking for cameras around the 7d price range.

cheers, phil

Should it be a Canon?


Alex || www.dylikowski.com (external link)
_______________
Canon 5D MKII | 24-105 f/4 IS L | 70-200 f/2.8 IS II L |Zeiss 35 f/1.4 ZE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:33 |  #14

gjl711 wrote in post #9215907 (external link)
If your looking at a camera in the 7D price range, heck, get the 7D. It has better low light capability than the 40 and many improved features as well. It's a very sweet camera.

Not a whole lot of ISO improvement, frankly..... Maybe a stop, I'd estimate with the 7D. And as to features, besides the addition of video and wireless flash control (which you actually could get more fully featured with an ST-E2 module), the bump up in features is pretty specialized and not really as great as you might think. Not that the 7D isn't a sweet camera... it is. But it's the most specialized APS-C camera has produced to date and I feel it's actually more of a step down model from the 1D MkIV, than it is a step up model from the 40/50D. Not a bad thing in any way, but just be sure it's what you really need and want or you might be disappointed.

If low light shooting is the goal... unless you really, really need the sports/action orientation of the 7D... get a 5D MkII instead. That will give you a lot better low light shooting capability... probably two to three stops potential. Of course, it's more expensive than 7D, too. If that's a problem, you might look at used but not abused 5DII or even 5D classic.

But, I have to agree with previous responses... If you can't put your finger on what you want and why, or what you feel is lacking with the 40D, then you really should stick with it and wait a bit. I wouldn't recommend an "upgrade" to a 50D, for example. Not enough real difference between the 50D and the 40D. 7D really only brings more AF modes, many of which are specific to action shooting, better build and slightly higher resolution and ISO capabilities. Not a huge bump up. I suspect there will be a 60D announced come springtime, which might have a feature set that makes more sense, coming from 40D.

And, yes, glass before cameras... Always. Lens upgrades will do more for you than changing camera bodies. Don't know what you already use, so it's hard to advise really. One or more fast primes might augment a zoom kit, for example.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ferrari_Alex
Goldmember
Avatar
1,787 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Dec 17, 2009 12:40 |  #15

I switched from 40D to 5D MKII....it is an upgrade, but there is not going to be any WOW:-)


Alex || www.dylikowski.com (external link)
_______________
Canon 5D MKII | 24-105 f/4 IS L | 70-200 f/2.8 IS II L |Zeiss 35 f/1.4 ZE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,448 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
time to switch
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1675 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.