Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 12:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Mini Review - Canon 35/f1.4 L

 
schmoelzel
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2001
Location: London (Canada)
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:10 |  #1

Well, as many of you know I recently purchased this very scarce and hard-to-find-in-stock lens. I have had a few PM's and emails asking me my various opinions of the 35F1.4 L and while I am no pro equipment reviewer, maybe my humble thoughts will be of some interest to someone! :)

First the lens............here's a picture of my 50F1.4 and the 35F1.4 side by side. As you can see, the 35 has more heft and is twice the size. It is also finished in typical L glass fashion; feels solid and weight is just right on my Canon 1D.........

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



Some questions that I have received in the last few days after I posted some of my first shots with this lens:

Is it sharp? In a word, YES! I have a real weakness for sharpness and this lens does not disappoint. The DoF wide open is very narrow especially when you are close to your subject and that is where your focus point is critical. You can really get some crazy DoF effects if you tilt the camera and play around with the plane of focus.

Is it heavy? I find it the perfect weight with my 1D. It is easy to carry around (much easier than my 300 F4!!) but feels very stable. I have read over and over again that those with this lens feel 'inspired' when they have this attached to their camera body.

Is the bokeh nice? I love to isolate the subject from its' background and this lens has that ability in spades. I have noticed in the past couple of days that when I take shots further away from the subject, the background becomes less blurred but the subject seems to 'pop' out of picture. I think this is to do with the incredible contrast that this lens produces. Much the same effect that you get from the 135F2 L.........some refer to it as a '3-D' look.

Is it worth the money over the 35F2 version? Don't know that since I have never used the 35F2. I have read that optically they are very similiar. If so, the 35F2 is a hell of a bargain. I think with this lens what you pay for is the build quality and the better contrast and saturation that you can achieve. I haven't seen many shots taken with the 35F2 version that exhibit the '3-D' pop that this lens produces. I am happy to have spent the money on the lens and I guess that is what counts!!

I could conclude this with a more scientific and thorough set of test pics (brick walls, focus sheets etc etc) but I find that the most practical and informative shots taken with any lens are those that we all would take in everyday settings. Since I take mainly pictures of my daughter Julia, I will post a few more and let you all judge for yourself if this is a good lens or rather worth the $$ that is costs. In my humble opinion, I think it is and I am enjoying it immensely!! Thanks for looking and I hope this helps someone else come to a decision to pursue the purchase of this great piece of Canon glass. If anyone has any questions or statements concerning this lens or my little mini-review, just ask and I will try to answer as best as I can.......remember, I am not a professional review person so take all my observations with a grain of salt!! :D

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
cdhender
Senior Member
Avatar
547 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:36 |  #2

Thanks for the review. Pretty much re-enforced what I've read about this lense: it's sharp, built well and performs well wide open. I have a 17-40 but I still want this lense. Now if I could just find an extra $1100 laying around to buy it.


Chris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gramps
Goldmember
Avatar
1,058 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:43 |  #3

WOW!!!!!!!! I think it's time to start saving the pocket change for another "L". Those shots are GREAT!!!!!


Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh (external link)
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,791 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:45 |  #4

.............I'm salivating............​...

slurp slurp!!!

Thanks for the review!!! Truly one of Canon's gem.

Ro1




www.pbase.com/roanjohn (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
8,866 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Nov 2002
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:46 |  #5

Thanks Schmoelzel. Excellent review. And more stunning pictures to boot!
You can definately see the 3D effect, even in #1.
I know what you meant about the lens being inspirational. I feel like I can't take a bad picture when the 135L is on my camera.
Curious, how is the autofocus? I'm sure it's super fast, and accurate, right?
I think when Julia grows up, she will remember dad having a black box for a nose :)


1D Mark III - 5D Mark IV - 24-70/2.8L - 70-200/2.8L Mark II - Samyang 14/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2001
Location: London (Canada)
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:53 |  #6

Drisley: AF is blazing fast in good light; little slower but nothing thats bothersome in dim settings. Yeah, AF is spot on......no error from guy with camera allowed!! Julia already thinks that I have one eye.........

Thanks for all the other comments......Ro1, stop salivating and just get out the cheque-book!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed2day
Senior Member
633 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:39 |  #7

Wow, great shots. I'm particularly impressed with the color quality and bokeh--highlights seem to be perfect spheres. And of course sharp. I'm also impressed with the sharpness in the pic of the two lenses. Was that taken with your 135?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,743 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:45 |  #8

Great shots, from a great lens. There's a reason that this is considered one of the best wide angle lenses around.


Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blinking8s
Goldmember
Avatar
1,618 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: w.kentucky
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:48 |  #9

*sigh* i want one of those too....that sigma 30mm better hold up


blinking8s.com (external link) | pixelpost photoblog application (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,791 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:57 as a reply to  @ schmoelzel's post |  #10

schmoelzel wrote:
Thanks for all the other comments......Ro1, stop salivating and just get out the cheque-book!!

*sigh*...........I wish it was that easy.............:confused:

Ro1




www.pbase.com/roanjohn (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2001
Location: London (Canada)
     
Jun 16, 2005 15:41 as a reply to  @ ed2day's post |  #11

ed2day wrote:
Wow, great shots. I'm particularly impressed with the color quality and bokeh--highlights seem to be perfect spheres. And of course sharp. I'm also impressed with the sharpness in the pic of the two lenses. Was that taken with your 135?

The colour is amazing.....the shot of the two lenses was taken with the 100f2.8 Macro, a great lens in it's own right!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eosster
Senior Member
473 posts
Joined Nov 2004
     
Jun 16, 2005 19:44 |  #12

Man, my wallet is getting thinner and thinner, lol. Awsome images. Enjoy!!!


Canon EOS 60D | EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghocking
Senior Member
965 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Barrow-in-Furness England
     
Jun 17, 2005 00:01 as a reply to  @ post 605983 |  #13

These shots are not sharp, there are better than that. We need a new word for wow sharp.


Geoff Hocking
G9|20D|40D|50D|5D|7D|1​DMkIIN
60 Macro|50 1.4|100 Macro|17-40 L|24-105 L|100-400 L|Sigma 18-200 OS
270EX|430EXII|580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boomerang
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Jun 17, 2005 00:44 |  #14

Schmoelzel- just wondering what your think about the 35 1.4 compared to the 50 1.4
As far as DOF, sharpness, AF....etc.

By the way excellent photos!


Francesco
Canon 7D
50mm 1.4 : 50mm 1.8 : 17-40L : 70-200 2.8L IS
vertical grip : mountainsmith

http://francesco.blogp​hotography.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
8,866 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Nov 2002
     
Jun 17, 2005 06:51 as a reply to  @ ghocking's post |  #15

ghocking wrote:
These shots are not sharp, there are better than that. We need a new word for wow sharp.

Hmm, yes indeed... let me think.... how about... "scrumtralescent"!


1D Mark III - 5D Mark IV - 24-70/2.8L - 70-200/2.8L Mark II - Samyang 14/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

48,337 views & 0 likes for this thread
Mini Review - Canon 35/f1.4 L
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is illidan2000
491 guests, 300 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.