Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 12:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Your Canon lens wishlist?

 
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,399 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2541
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:17 |  #1

I would like to see

40/1.2L (on 1.3X it would be a nice 52mm FoV lens)

200 f/2.8L IS (so that I could leave 70-200IS home on tours).

16 f/2.8L prime with perfectly sharp corners.

200-500 f/4.5L IS (to replace 100-400).


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2001
Location: London (Canada)
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:32 |  #2

Ok......I'll play Pekka:

85 f1.0 - for really LOW light shooting!!

200 f1.8 IS -
so I can finally afford the original when people drop them for the IS version

135 f1.4 - I love this focal length on my 1D and with a wider aperture it would be awesome for portrait work!

35 f1.2 - I am loving this focal length as well on my 1D and I can just imagine how great it would be with an extra stop of light!!

Pekka......can you make this happen with your 'pull' with Canon!!??:D

ps......just saw the Finnish Shouting Mens Choir in TO last week and they were AWESOME!!! Have you heard of these guys?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Jun 16, 2005 12:45 |  #3

The lenses I would like to see include:

a 100-500/2.8L IS as replacement for 100-400, but would settle for 200-500/4.5L IS as long as under $1500
This would be most likely lens I would get after 85/1.2, 135/2, and FE which are still on my list (in that order - sort of)

other lenses, less likely to see (or purchase)
16-35/2.8L II upgrade to 16-35 with better optics for eventual 22MP FF camera.
followed by 35-140/2.8L IS that will take extenders.
and then 140-560/2.8L IS just to one up everyone (it also need to take extenders).
Or something like the above set to improve the range and get it from four lenses into 3 at same time.

And now for my really cool lens I would like to see....
12-24/2.8L distortion adjustable (DA) lens allowing 180 fisheye circle to corner corrected lens. I am having trouble seeing how it could be done optically unless it is a function of the zoom (at 12 is 180 circle fisheye, at 15 is 180 corner fisheye, at 24 is distortion corrected), but would be cool if they could figure out how to get it to work at all focal ranges. Something for image scientists and engineers to work on. Get it to be at least 16-35L lens quality and keep it under $1500 and its mine (if I still have job at time).

Just my opinion,


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
felix21685
Goldmember
Avatar
1,371 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:08 |  #4

hah you guys are askin to much ;)

i would love to have
Canon 70-200 f/4L
Canon 17-40 f/4L
Tamron DI XR ZQ 99A9 whatever its called 28-80 f/2.8

some extension tubes and 50-60 dollar filter for each :)
alright whose buyin ?:)


---------------
50D, Rebel XT, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 28-135 IS,430EX, AT858
Everything you wanted to know about aftermarket batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,805 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:24 as a reply to  @ felix21685's post |  #5

Canon...............br​ing back the 50 f1.0 L[COLOR=black]!!!! Or even a 50 f1.2 L (fast focus) would be nice.

That is on the top of my list.

And I am jealous of the Nikon 17-55 f2.8..........

So Canon, give 'em a run for thier money with the 16-60 f2.8 L!!!

If Canon introduce these two lenses.........I will snap 'em up like white on rice!!

:-)

Ro1




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed2day
Senior Member
633 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
     
Jun 16, 2005 13:30 |  #6

I always wonder why they havent come out with an affordable 24-70L or 28-70L f/4 standard zoom to complement the 17-40 and 70-200 f/4.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jun 16, 2005 14:07 |  #7

OK, we'll start at the wide end and work up!
Replace the 14/2.8L with a 12/2.8L of higher optical quality.
18 mm f/2L wide angle
Revised 24/1.4
Revised mid-priced primes from the 20/2.8 up.
22-85 f/4L zoom
New revised 50/1.4 with true ring-type USM.
200/1.8 IS or 200/2 IS
200-400 f/4L IS
560/5.6L IS prime
22-85 f/4L

For EF-S
18-70 f/3.5-4.5 USM (kind of like the 28-105 in build and price)
15-50 f/2.8
Perhaps a range of fast primes - 14/2, 20/1.8, 30/1.4, 55 mm (though the standard 50 is fine here)


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Camo ­ 757
Senior Member
259 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 16, 2005 14:14 as a reply to  @ Tom W's post |  #8

400 DO

sooooo cooool


60D gripped/Tamron 17-50 VC 2.8/Tamron 60mm Macro 2.8/Canon 70-300mm IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,928 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10125
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 16, 2005 14:42 |  #9

Are we ignoring physics and optical properties in this wish list here?
Like are these "M" lenses for "Magic" :lol:

Most of these fantasy long zooms would be waaaaaay too heavy if they were actually made with modern techniques! :lol:

There are allready 500mm f/4.5 primes.. and they weight 7 pounds or more... and cost about $3K
Not likely to replace the lightweight and affordable 100-400mm with a 500mm zoom @ f/4.5. (all the current fairly carriable and affordable 500mm zooms are at f/6.3 at the long end)

A zoom @ f/4.5would be even heavier than the prime,.. and 500mm @ f/2.8 ??? Or 560mm @ f/2.8 ??

Absolutley collosal! We're approaching 1200mm f/5.6 size here!!!! This is a $90,000.00 lens we are talking about and one that no current standard tripod is rated to hold.

200-400mm f/4 is doable.. in fact I just handeled Nikons version of this lens a few weeks back.. again.. no way is this a 100-400mm replacement.. it is larger than the 300mm f/2.8.. nearly as large as the 500mm f/4 prime.. and about the same weight. (very nice lens though!) With a 1.4X it is a 280-560 f/5.6 zoom... not bad at all.


What I would like to see?

400mm f/5.6L IS with focus speed of the current 400mm and modern IS
AND/OR
Update the 100-400mm (you can knock 100mm off of the wide end and make it 200-400)
Keep it f/5.6 at the long end so it's just as light as the current one,. BUT update the AF so it is closer to the 400mm primes speed,. and replace the IS with the 3rd gen standard.

Make a decent 100-300mm for gods sake,.
Emulate Sigmas 100-300mm f/4 EX but add IS ;)

Canon needs to make a competitor for Sigma's 120-300mm f/2.8 as well. This will of course have IS,. it will cost over $3K and weigh a little more than the prime,. but it will rock for sports.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ddelallata
Goldmember
Avatar
1,191 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Brownsville, Tx USA
     
Jun 16, 2005 14:49 |  #10

I'l like to see a 10 or 12mm prime for around 350-450 dlls.


Dr. David de la Llata
_____________
Canon 20D
BG-E2 Battery Grip
Canon SpeedLite 430 EX
Canon EF 1.4X II
Canon EF-S 10-22mm F/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 USM
Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 MACRO USM
Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8 L USM
Olympus C-2020 (for infrared work)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sicily1918
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jun 16, 2005 15:57 as a reply to  @ ddelallata's post |  #11

  • A 2x-13xmm f/2.8L IS would be nice -- an uber-walkaround lens. The current 24-70 does not have enough zoom in it, the 28-135's a little soft, and there's nothing else. Actually, even f/2.8-3.5 would be OK if it had IS.
  • A non-push/pull 100-400 with third gen IS and maybe f/4 (if weight allows).
  • A 2x that doesn't kill AF?

Canon 50D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon BG-E2 Battery Grip | Canon Speedlite 580EX and 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xtrpureguts
Member
82 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Jun 16, 2005 16:12 |  #12

Canon needs to make a competitor for Sigma's 120-300mm f/2.8 as well. This will of course have IS,. it will cost over $3K and weigh a little more than the prime,. but it will rock for sports.


CDS,
I would love to have a Canon version of that lens, but my 300 f/2.8 IS would have to go on ebay. If you could only have one - which would it be?
Don


Don
_______________
Camera: Canon 20D, Canon 300D, BG-E2 Battery grip, Lenses: EF 50mm f1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, EF 70-200mm f2.8 IS, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, EF 135mm f2.0, EF 300mm f2.8 IS, Canon 1.4x TC, Sigma 1.4x TC , Flash: Canon 580 EX , Monopod: Gitzo MK2 Mountaineer, Printer: i960, i9900

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jun 16, 2005 17:11 |  #13

Pekka wrote:
I would like to see

40/1.2L (on 1.3X it would be a nice 52mm FoV lens)

200 f/2.8L IS (so that I could leave 70-200IS home on tours).

16 f/2.8L prime with perfectly sharp corners.

200-500 f/4.5L IS (to replace 100-400).

40/1.4L would do me, if pushing it to 1.2 would make the price silly, but otherwise YES, yes yes!
and the 16mm Prime also yes please :D :D :D

Not bothered bpout the others :cry:


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,928 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10125
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 16, 2005 17:12 |  #14

Yep..// I'd love to see a 16mm prime too...
And or make the 14mm more affordable


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Salleke
Goldmember
2,201 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Belgium
     
Jun 16, 2005 17:19 |  #15

It must be possible to make a lens from 24 (15?) - 135 (200?) mm 2.8 L IS (new generation). To replace the very old 28 - 135.
Also to lower the 70 mm from the 70 - 200 series in the low end.
And must not extend when we are zooming and not turn when it's focussing. To choose in white or black and the weight of the 28 - 135. And, and...
And to have for 750 USD. Ok, i'm now going to sleep and dream on this night...:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,100 views & 0 likes for this thread, 41 members have posted to it.
Your Canon lens wishlist?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2824 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.