Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 17 Dec 2009 (Thursday) 21:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sunpak vs. Quantum: A surprising result

 
tetrode
I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information
Avatar
3,777 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
Dec 17, 2009 21:49 |  #1

Although I suspect this will be of limited interest to most, I thought I'd share the results of a little test I performed this evening.

I've had a Sunpak 120J flash unit for some time and have come to love its power and bare bulb goodness. Finding a second one at a reasonable price has proven challenging. The 120J is a much sought after discontinued gem.

Anyway, in scrounging for another 120J, I discovered that used Quantum T2 flash units are fairly readily available on the used market and at prices often significantly lower than Sunpak 120J prices. Fancy features aside, the Quantum packs 150WS of stored energy while the Sunpak is rated at 115WS. On paper, that seems like a substantial difference. With its lower price and higher power, I recently decided to purchase a used Quantum T2.

The test:

This evening, I thought I'd see how the power of the T2 compares to the 120J. Note that both are similarly configured bare bulb type flash units that share a common accessory mount. The test setup had both flash units mounted to a Photoflex Quantum/Lumedyne speedring and firing into a Photoflex 24" x 32" white-lined softbox. A Minolta Flashmeter IV set to cordless mode and ISO 200 was positioned exactly 3' from the front baffle of the softbox. Power for the flash units was provided by a Quantum Turbo battery and the flashes were fired with Pocket Wizard triggers.

The setup:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4003/4193543891_24f0e37d52_o.jpg

The Sunpak 120J:

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2688/4194301542_3d2957a18b_o.jpg

Fatboy (aka Quantum T2):

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4011/4193543827_422a3951df_o.jpg

The Results:

I tested both units at full, half, and quarter power settings. Multiple pops at each. Here's what I found (numbers in columns 2 and 3 are f/stops):

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4040/4194348414_bd531434ff_o.jpg

Well, so much for the extra 35WS stored in the T2. The T2 is significantly bulkier and slower recycling (at least my copy) than my 120J while offering little in the way of useful additional output power. To be fair, the Quantum offers advanced capabilities that the 120J can only dream of. However, if the intent is to use either flash in manual mode only, in my opinion, the 120J floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee and is the better choice of the two. The icing on the cake is that the physical packaging of the Sunpak is much more bracket-friendly than the Quantum in that it can be positioned such that the flash tube fully enters an attached modifier. Here it is mounted on a Kacey bracket:

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2469/3943357384_ce2d7f39be_b.jpg

Fatboy's belly extends almost as far as the base of its flash tube so the tube cannot be fully inserted into a softbox or octa the way the Sunpak tube can.

Game, set, match Sunpak.

Now if only you could find clean 120Js at Quantum T2 prices ...

Dave F.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 17, 2009 22:20 |  #2

Moral of the story (what we have always said!)...The watt-second rating of any flash unit is only a measure of the amount of electrical charge stored in the storage capacitor, and does not reflect the electrical efficiency of delivery of that charge to the flash tube. Two studio strobes with identical watt-second ratings may have 2x as might light from one than from the other.

Furthermore, 35 w-s is 30% electrical capacity increase over the lower powered Sunpak. Where 100% more power is one EV difference or a change in GN value by 1.414x. 30% difference is going to provide only a 1.15x change in GN if the two were identical in conversion of electricity to light.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,677 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Sunpak vs. Quantum: A surprising result
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1194 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.