Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 20 Dec 2009 (Sunday) 19:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I'm so confused!

 
mn ­ shutterbug
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 778
Joined Apr 2008
Location: SW Minnesota
     
Dec 20, 2009 19:56 |  #1

A friend and I were shooting birds yesterday, around a backyard feeder. We both shoot a 50D with a 100-400L lens. He was using a 430 EX and I was using a 430 EXII. It was a flat gray and dull sky. He was shooting his flash in ETTL at full power. His pictures at 30 -40 feet came out well exposed. This blows me away. As I assumed, there was no return detected, due to the angle and the empty area around the bird. When I attempted that, the flash blew the heck out of everything. Also, we were both shooting at 5.6 and 1/250 sec. The only difference is, his shots were at ISO 400 and mine at ISO 640. When I attempted to shoot the flash in manual, even at 1/64 power, it was over powering. Any explanation or advice?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Dec 20, 2009 20:12 |  #2

mn shutterbug wrote in post #9235421 (external link)
He was shooting his flash in ETTL at full power.

This doesn't make sense. In E-TTL mode, the camera decides how much power to use.

When using Manual flash mode, use the distance scale on the back of the flash to help with power adjustments. If it's giving you too much light at the lowest power setting, you need to stop down the aperture or lower the ISO.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mn ­ shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 778
Joined Apr 2008
Location: SW Minnesota
     
Dec 20, 2009 20:14 |  #3

I agree, it doesn't make sense. Since there was no return detection, the flash should have stayed on way too long.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Dec 20, 2009 20:19 |  #4

What do you mean, there was no return detection?


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Dec 20, 2009 20:20 |  #5

Were you both shooting with the camera in manual mode? If so, your pictures might have been overexposing because of the higher ISO you were using. In other words, the overexposure might have been from the ambient lighting rather than the flash. Did you check the meter in the viewfinder to see if the camera settings were appropriate for the ambient exposure you wanted?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mn ­ shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 778
Joined Apr 2008
Location: SW Minnesota
     
Dec 20, 2009 20:25 |  #6

Leo, we were both shooting in Av and his was set at +1 EC, which should have made things even worse, whereas mine was set at +2/3 EC.

I should clarify one thing. We compared his shots from yesterday and mine from today. This is why he was shooting at ISO 400 and me at ISO 640, and getting the same shutter speed and aperture.

It's all been figured out. The problem was me. I haven't advanced with technology. My mind was still back in the 80's with the old technology.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,311 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
I'm so confused!
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1501 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.