Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 25 Dec 2009 (Friday) 22:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The Hoff got a new camera!

 
Sam
Goldmember
Avatar
4,044 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Northern California
     
Dec 28, 2009 14:25 |  #31

HappySnapper90 wrote in post #9277169 (external link)
You're probably better off using the new Ektar 100 in 120 size instead of the Porta line. Ektar is newer with next to zero grain and does well with exposure latitude/dynamic range.

I've never tried the Ektar film but the Portra is nice. I have used both kinds and the results are good out of my Bronica. Is the Ektar c41 processing?

With a holga image quality isn't as important as composition and creativity. The camera has a lot to be desired in the quality control department. It's more of a fun creative outlet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Dec 29, 2009 22:08 |  #32

solinger wrote in post #9277195 (external link)
I've never tried the Ektar film but the Portra is nice. I have used both kinds and the results are good out of my Bronica. Is the Ektar c41 processing?

I've never used MF film before, but Ektar is color negative film.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Dec 29, 2009 22:51 |  #33

You don't want Ektar for people pics (stick with Portras for those). It has a bit of a red hue to it. Great for landscapes, though.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkarris
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Dec 29, 2009 22:59 |  #34

I shoot 110... :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Dec 30, 2009 00:49 |  #35

solinger wrote in post #9277195 (external link)
I've never tried the Ektar film but the Portra is nice. I have used both kinds and the results are good out of my Bronica. Is the Ektar c41 processing?

With a holga image quality isn't as important as composition and creativity. The camera has a lot to be desired in the quality control department. It's more of a fun creative outlet.

It's not C41.

EDIT: Oops I was thinking of something else.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Dec 30, 2009 09:50 |  #36

Ektar is C-41. Any lab that can do color negatives can process Ektar, including the 1 hour places.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Dec 30, 2009 11:15 |  #37

Tony-S wrote in post #9289337 (external link)
Ektar is C-41. Any lab that can do color negatives can process Ektar, including the 1 hour places.

Indeed; Ektar is a standard process color neg film. It was our go to film for press stuff but for personality, I'll choose Portra or Ultra NC any day of the week.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sam
Goldmember
Avatar
4,044 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Northern California
     
Dec 30, 2009 13:20 as a reply to  @ TheHoff's post |  #38

I will have to grab some when I get to that side of town this week...

I was going to suggest you check out the new Fuji instant camera since you seem to like your new plastic camera, but when I looked at them on Amazon it seems that they tripled in price :rolleyes:

I am pretty sure mine was bought for about $35 but now they are $75 - $100ish???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 01, 2010 09:07 |  #39

While doing keyword research on an unrelated matter, I ran across this link for ya', hoff!

http://www.holgablog.c​om/ (external link)

Enjoy!


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jan 01, 2010 09:11 |  #40

Thanks!

I've got something good to use it on today but no film! My lab/film store has been closed over the holidays and now I expect most, if not all, places downtown that carry 120 are closed today :rolleyes:


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Electric ­ Shepherd
Senior Member
Avatar
997 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Leicester, U.K.
     
Jan 16, 2010 08:37 |  #41

TheHoff wrote in post #9276193 (external link)
The shutter is listed as 1/100 or so but there are various places on the net that say the aperture is either f/11 or f/13. I'm probably over thinking it but I go by sunny 16 and I want to have an idea what the two settings are on the aperture dial -- cloudy and sunny. Anyone know? It is a new model 120N.

Stupid film store is closed today :D

I've read that the apertures on the new ones are f/8 and f/11.

I did the "flock" mod on my 120N [Spray the non-sensitive interior parts and back matt black] to reduce some internal reflections.

So far I've run off around 6 rolls of 120 through mine [Ilford HP5+ and Fuji Superia] with, shall we say, variable results :lol:

It's a charming bit of kit though and that back to basics stuff makes me chuckle when I use it. And indeed, don't forget the lens cap :oops: :rolleyes: :wink:


My Gear

My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jan 16, 2010 13:58 |  #42

Hoff, why haven't we seen any pics?


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Electric ­ Shepherd
Senior Member
Avatar
997 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Leicester, U.K.
     
Jan 17, 2010 08:40 as a reply to  @ Tony-S's post |  #43

Where would you post them? There's not an obvious area for non-Canon film pictures to go is there?


My Gear

My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jan 17, 2010 08:54 |  #44

bah too busy with people who want new fangled digital pics :D

also this camera requires sunlight... which we've had exactly 2 days of in about 3 weeks. I will get some scans up though!


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jan 17, 2010 09:05 |  #45

Electric Shepherd wrote in post #9410321 (external link)
Where would you post them? There's not an obvious area for non-Canon film pictures to go is there?

There's no rule against posting them in this thread, but there's also the film thread.

TheHoff wrote in post #9410383 (external link)
bah too busy with people who want new fangled digital pics. also this camera requires sunlight... which we've had exactly 2 days of in about 3 weeks. I will get some scans up though!

OK, we'll patiently wait. ;)


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,482 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
The Hoff got a new camera!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2616 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.