Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Dec 2009 (Monday) 07:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Exposure question

 
naford
Member
91 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Dec 28, 2009 07:51 |  #1

Despite reading in manuals and some websites about Evaluative, Spot and partial, I tend to leave my camera just on Evaluative ? I never really get the difference, just thought out of all the members out there, that have much greater knowledge than me, can you tell a simpleton when and where I should use these different type settings ?

Thanks again in advance ?


Gear: 7D & WFT-E5 Grip | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Canon EF-S 17-55mm IS 2.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Manfrotto 055XPROB | Manfrotto 808RC4 Head | Canon Speedlite 580EX ii |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 28, 2009 08:37 |  #2

Using the evaluative setting is essentially turning over control to Canon's programmer's whims about how to measure the light in a scene. For typical outdoor snapshots, it will work just fine. However, when you get into any more difficult situations - high contrast and/or backlit scenes, for example - you will not have the necessary control to get consistently good results.

I always leave my 20D on "partial" mode - the closest thing I can get to "spot". That lets me choose the part of the scene that I want to use to measure the light level rather than having the camera essentially average the whole scene and make up its own electronic mind about the results.

That said, I use a handheld meter far more often than the camera's meter and the camera's exposure mode dial is almost always set to to "M" for manual control.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 28, 2009 08:56 |  #3

Evaluative is good for most general situations. Where you have a scene that has fairly even illumination, evaluative should work fine.

Where it might struggle is where you have vastly differing areas of illumination, especially if one are is much bigger than another; eg a performer at a concert standing in a spotlight. Evaluative will look at the entire scene when determining what exposure to give. The result is very likely going to overexpose the performer. To counter this, you can switch to spot metering, which measures a much smaller area to determine exposure. If you spot meter off the performer, he/she will then be correctly exposed.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 28, 2009 10:00 |  #4

naford wrote in post #9275039 (external link)
Despite reading in manuals and some websites about Evaluative, Spot and partial, I tend to leave my camera just on Evaluative ? I never really get the difference, just thought out of all the members out there, that have much greater knowledge than me, can you tell a simpleton when and where I should use these different type settings ?

Thanks again in advance ?

Evaluative = This is the metering mode to use when you want the camera meter to make the decision for you how to expose the scene. It's usually pretty close to correct unless the scene is really 'off' (heavily backlit, snow etc). It's the mode for when you do not want to think.

Center Weighted Average = Evaluative mode from the 1970's. They keep this mode so the old guys feel comfortable.

Spot - This mode allows you to directly take meter readings of specific tones in the scene and then select an exposure based on those readings. If you don't understand what I just said, don't use spot metering. For sure spot meter is not for when you just want to point the camera at things and take pictures without thinking.

Partial - Same as spot metering with a bigger target area. This mode is even more useless than Center Weighted Average. Don't use it.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Heath
Goldmember
Avatar
2,332 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: NYC, NY
     
Dec 28, 2009 10:17 |  #5

Just to completely confuse the situation...

I was strictly using spot metering. Then I added a split prism focusing screen and the camera meter was all over the place. After finding a post on this forum, I changed to Partial Metering and I was able to get some consistency again with the on camera meter. Yes, I loose the benefits of a 3 degree spot meter, but now I have a consistent guide to start with.


Heath
"Some photographers push the envelope. Some sit behind a keyboard and criticize their accomplishments." (seen in the comments of a photo article)
Blog (external link)-Twitter (external link)-Zenfolio (external link)-500px (external link)-Pinterest (external link)-Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 28, 2009 10:25 |  #6

diputs wrote in post #9275718 (external link)
Just to completely confuse the situation...

I was strictly using spot metering. Then I added a split prism focusing screen and the camera meter was all over the place. After finding a post on this forum, I changed to Partial Metering and I was able to get some consistency again with the on camera meter. Yes, I loose the benefits of a 3 degree spot meter, but now I have a consistent guide to start with.

If you want to use a split screen, consider getting a handheld meter that can take incident readings as well as spot reflective.

I use an incident meter, and I almost never use the meter in my camera anymore.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Heath
Goldmember
Avatar
2,332 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: NYC, NY
     
Dec 28, 2009 10:31 |  #7

JeffreyG wrote in post #9275758 (external link)
If you want to use a split screen, consider getting a handheld meter that can take incident readings as well as spot reflective.

I use an incident meter, and I almost never use the meter in my camera anymore.

Interesting that you mention this as I keep looking at the Sekonic 358. I was all ready to get a meter until I started watching some videos on using Flash.

On the Strobist Lighting DVDs, and on the Joe McNally and David Ziser videos on Kelby Training, they are all chimping and using the histrogram as the method of metering. I am sure there is one out there, but so far I have not seen a video on using a flash that uses a non camera meter.

Is Joe McNally, David Ziser and David Hobby doing it wrong?


Heath
"Some photographers push the envelope. Some sit behind a keyboard and criticize their accomplishments." (seen in the comments of a photo article)
Blog (external link)-Twitter (external link)-Zenfolio (external link)-500px (external link)-Pinterest (external link)-Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 28, 2009 10:37 |  #8

diputs wrote in post #9275791 (external link)
On the Strobist Lighting DVDs, and on the Joe McNally and David Ziser videos on Kelby Training, they are all chimping and using the histrogram as the method of metering. I am sure there is one out there, but so far I have not seen a video on using a flash that uses a non camera meter.

Is Joe McNally, David Ziser and David Hobby doing it wrong?

Flash uses E-TTL metering unless you shoot manual flash power. E-TTL does use the camera meter, but not in the same way as you meter ambient light.

Get a high end handheld meter and you can use it to meter ambient and manually set flashes. Or you can use the meter to measure ambient and then still let the camera manage the flashes via E-TTL.

I have no idea what affect your focus screen will have on E-TTL though.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 28, 2009 12:46 |  #9

My old T90 use to let you take several spot readings and would then average them for the final exposure. Useful in situations where you had more than one backlit subject for example. Do any of the modern digital cameras have this ability?


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

694 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Exposure question
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2682 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.