This bridge was built in 1929 and abandoned in 1968.
 | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
NukeGM Senior Member  930 posts Likes: 45 Joined Jan 2006 Location: AZ Desert More info | Dec 28, 2009 23:22 | #1 This bridge was built in 1929 and abandoned in 1968.
Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things"  57,721 posts Likes: 4045 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Dec 28, 2009 23:24 | #2 how bizarre. Nice picture though. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SloNeZ600 Senior Member  726 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Dec 29, 2009 04:56 | #3 Oh this must have been a federally funded project. LOL Panasonic DMC SZ50
LOG IN TO REPLY |
firesuite Member  134 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Dec 29, 2009 16:34 | #4 nice capture, HDR isnt over the top, well done My Portfolio - www.grahamgilmore.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chadams45 Senior Member  270 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Philly More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:18 | #5 Very nicely done, not overly processed. Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsphotography.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BeatPoet Member 44 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Edinburgh More info | Dec 29, 2009 21:23 | #6 You think? It looks very unnatural to me. Not sure why it needed the HDR treatment, it's not a contrasty scene.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chadams45 Senior Member 270 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Philly More info | Dec 29, 2009 21:27 | #7 BeatPoet wrote in post #9286643  You think? It looks very unnatural to me. Not sure why it needed the HDR treatment, it's not a contrasty scene. I don't tend to push the saturation levels of a HDR photo to the limits and this photo has not been pushed IMHO. I like it, but again IMO. Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsphotography.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Dec 30, 2009 08:15 | #8 |
Dec 30, 2009 09:46 | #9 CannedHeat wrote in post #9288851 Looks like a neat subject. Can you get on it or is it gated-off? Gated off but there is a hole in the fence. So if you wanted you could walk it. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radders Cream of the Crop  5,017 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2009 Location: UK More info | Dec 30, 2009 10:12 | #10 I like it, but do you have the original? | 1DII | 7D | 60D | 6D | 100 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 11-16 2.8 | 24-105 4 | 70-300 IS USM |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 657 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
