Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 29 Dec 2009 (Tuesday) 20:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Modest HDR attempt

 
chadams45
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Philly
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:05 |  #1

Let me have your critical analysis on this HDR shot.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsp​hotography.com/ (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crashthenet44
Senior Member
Avatar
514 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Rails of the Lehigh Valley Line and Trenton Sub
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:25 |  #2

Any reason you didn't level the horizon?

I'm not a fan of heavily processed HDR's, but this one I like. Though, I would fix the artifacts that you have going on along the left edge above the horizon.

My bigger problem with the shot is whether or not the HDR is the only thing making this photo intersting. My eye has no one place to land on. It roams from the Water Works, to the Schuylkill, to Boat House Row and onto the sky.


FLICKR (external link)
http://blogspot.vision​sfromphilly.com (external link)

50D | OM-2n | OM-4T | Hasselblad 500C/M | Yashica GSN | Yashica A | NO2. Brownie Model F

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zwright
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: WA
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:25 |  #3

oversaturated imho and what happend to the sky, aside from the that the shoot is composed very well, just try not going so extreme with the colors and hdr effect untill you know its limits, i am not an hdr expert i just know what "look" i like


40D | EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 | EF 50 F/1.8 mkII|Tamron EF 200-400mm F/5.6 | some P.O.S. flash | Domke Ruggedwear f-3X | Photoshop CS4 Extended | Photomatix pro |
| FLICKR (external link) |
| This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between sending private messages. Please try again in 2 seconds. WHAT? |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlphaChicken
Knot Hank
Avatar
3,569 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:32 |  #4

Agree that the shot is over-cooked. I think the horizon has to work that way as far as straightening it. If the horizon was to be straightened, then the buildings (which are the subject as i understand it) would all by crooked. It might could use a very slight amount, but the actual horizon is not what should be used as a reference for straightening.


I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot. ;)
My family calls me Hen, but you can call me Chicken. See you out there!
|Deviant Art (external link)
|Facebook (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,358 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1834
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:37 |  #5

The light is on the edge of surreal - just a bit too good to be true and not false enough to be surreal.
I support the posters that suggest straightening the horizon. The boathouse (is that what is called?) is leaning to the left as far as I can see.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chadams45
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Philly
     
Dec 29, 2009 20:42 |  #6

Thanks, guess I'll keep working at keeping it toned down a bit and working at focal points.


Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsp​hotography.com/ (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimmyG
Member
Avatar
231 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Philadelphia
     
Dec 29, 2009 21:42 |  #7

I know where this is :) Right between the Spring Garden bridge and Art Museum. I like the effect on the trees to the right and the boat houses in the background. The foreground building is too yellow and the water almost looks oily.


James
Gripped EOS 5Dc|Gripped EOS 7D|EOS 450D|EOS Elan|Polaroid 103|Minolta X-700|Rokinon 8mm Fisheye|Canon 40mm 2.8 'pancake'|Canon 85mm 1.8|Canon 70-200 F4 L

James R Graves Photo (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carguy4471
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2009 21:43 |  #8

I like the look of the HDR. There seems to be a color cast, and the horizon isn't straight. I gave it a quick go, just using ACR. Adjusted WB and straightened.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Duane
GEAR - FLICKr (external link) - SmugMug (external link):p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chadams45
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Philly
     
Dec 29, 2009 21:49 |  #9

JimmyG wrote in post #9286764 (external link)
I know where this is :) Right between the Spring Garden bridge and Art Museum. I like the effect on the trees to the right and the boat houses in the background. The foreground building is too yellow and the water almost looks oily.

Sunset, it cast a yellowish shadow. To much push on the temperature setting.


Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsp​hotography.com/ (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carguy4471
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2009 21:52 |  #10

That's true, the sunset usually gives you a pretty warm tint. Sometimes it can be a bit much though. The white balance adjustment is usually done to taste. I really dig what HDR did for the scene as a whole though. There are still some pretty dark shadows, clipped actually, as well as some clipped highlights. With the dynamic range of this scene I would add an additional underexposed and overexposed exposure.


Duane
GEAR - FLICKr (external link) - SmugMug (external link):p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,358 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1834
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Dec 29, 2009 22:48 |  #11

Apart from the straightening I like the original better Carguy4471. Your WB adjustment makes it far too blueish for me. It lost the nice sunset feel - even if a tad overdone.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carguy4471
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2009 23:13 |  #12

vk2gwk wrote in post #9287114 (external link)
Apart from the straightening I like the original better Carguy4471. Your WB adjustment makes it far too blueish for me. It lost the nice sunset feel - even if a tad overdone.

As I go back and look at it now, you're pretty right. I think somewhere between the two would be a good medium.


Duane
GEAR - FLICKr (external link) - SmugMug (external link):p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zwright
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: WA
     
Dec 29, 2009 23:58 |  #13

i was thinking somwthing like this how you dont mind my edit

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

40D | EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 | EF 50 F/1.8 mkII|Tamron EF 200-400mm F/5.6 | some P.O.S. flash | Domke Ruggedwear f-3X | Photoshop CS4 Extended | Photomatix pro |
| FLICKR (external link) |
| This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between sending private messages. Please try again in 2 seconds. WHAT? |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,358 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1834
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Dec 30, 2009 04:08 |  #14

The more variations I see, the better I like the original.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OdiN1701
Goldmember
Avatar
2,523 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Dec 30, 2009 10:21 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

They are all overprocessed. Also not much of a fan of the composition as a whole.


SAY NO TO SPEC WORK! (external link)
_______________
40D w/ Grip |
20D w/ Grip | 10D
10-22mm|17-40f/4L|24-105f/4LIS|70-200f/2.8LIS|50f/1.4|100f/2.8Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,936 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Modest HDR attempt
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Aristosan
406 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.