Let me have your critical analysis on this HDR shot.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
chadams45 Senior Member ![]() 270 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Philly More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:05 | #1 Let me have your critical analysis on this HDR shot.
Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsphotography.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crashthenet44 Senior Member ![]() 514 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Rails of the Lehigh Valley Line and Trenton Sub More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:25 | #2 Any reason you didn't level the horizon? FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zwright Member ![]() 188 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: WA More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:25 | #3 oversaturated imho and what happend to the sky, aside from the that the shoot is composed very well, just try not going so extreme with the colors and hdr effect untill you know its limits, i am not an hdr expert i just know what "look" i like 40D | EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 | EF 50 F/1.8 mkII|Tamron EF 200-400mm F/5.6 | some P.O.S. flash | Domke Ruggedwear f-3X | Photoshop CS4 Extended | Photomatix pro |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlphaChicken Knot Hank ![]() 3,569 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Asheville, NC More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:32 | #4 Agree that the shot is over-cooked. I think the horizon has to work that way as far as straightening it. If the horizon was to be straightened, then the buildings (which are the subject as i understand it) would all by crooked. It might could use a very slight amount, but the actual horizon is not what should be used as a reference for straightening. I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop ![]() 13,358 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1834 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Dec 29, 2009 20:37 | #5 The light is on the edge of surreal - just a bit too good to be true and not false enough to be surreal. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2009 20:42 | #6 Thanks, guess I'll keep working at keeping it toned down a bit and working at focal points. Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsphotography.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyG Member ![]() 231 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Philadelphia More info | Dec 29, 2009 21:42 | #7 I know where this is James
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carguy4471 Senior Member 464 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Dec 29, 2009 21:43 | #8 |
Dec 29, 2009 21:49 | #9 JimmyG wrote in post #9286764 ![]() I know where this is ![]() Sunset, it cast a yellowish shadow. To much push on the temperature setting. Canon 5D Mark II gripped, 1Ds Classic, 7D, 20 D, Canon, EF 17-40 mm f/4 L EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4 L series USM F4.0, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, 50 mm f.1.4,http://www.chuckadamsphotography.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carguy4471 Senior Member 464 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Dec 29, 2009 21:52 | #10 That's true, the sunset usually gives you a pretty warm tint. Sometimes it can be a bit much though. The white balance adjustment is usually done to taste. I really dig what HDR did for the scene as a whole though. There are still some pretty dark shadows, clipped actually, as well as some clipped highlights. With the dynamic range of this scene I would add an additional underexposed and overexposed exposure. Duane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop ![]() 13,358 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1834 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Dec 29, 2009 22:48 | #11 Apart from the straightening I like the original better Carguy4471. Your WB adjustment makes it far too blueish for me. It lost the nice sunset feel - even if a tad overdone. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carguy4471 Senior Member 464 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Dec 29, 2009 23:13 | #12 vk2gwk wrote in post #9287114 ![]() Apart from the straightening I like the original better Carguy4471. Your WB adjustment makes it far too blueish for me. It lost the nice sunset feel - even if a tad overdone. As I go back and look at it now, you're pretty right. I think somewhere between the two would be a good medium. Duane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zwright Member ![]() 188 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: WA More info | Dec 29, 2009 23:58 | #13 i was thinking somwthing like this how you dont mind my edit
40D | EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 | EF 50 F/1.8 mkII|Tamron EF 200-400mm F/5.6 | some P.O.S. flash | Domke Ruggedwear f-3X | Photoshop CS4 Extended | Photomatix pro |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop ![]() 13,358 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1834 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Dec 30, 2009 04:08 | #14 The more variations I see, the better I like the original. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OdiN1701 Goldmember ![]() 2,523 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Dec 30, 2009 10:21 | #15 ![]() They are all overprocessed. Also not much of a fan of the composition as a whole. SAY NO TO SPEC WORK!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Aristosan 406 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |