It's good but it seems like only 9/10th sharp to me. This is the actual without crop so at least I know I can print it as big as I possibly would want.
Fastfwd13 Senior Member 491 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Canada, Montreal More info | Dec 29, 2009 23:49 | #1 It's good but it seems like only 9/10th sharp to me. This is the actual without crop so at least I know I can print it as big as I possibly would want.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Dec 30, 2009 00:07 | #2 At a shutter speed of 1/90sec I'm pretty sure that what you're seeing there is motion blur from camera shake. Handheld shot, I presume? - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 31, 2009 07:57 | #3 I did not realize the shutter speed was that slow. I was getting 1/2000 earlier that day with 2.8 and ISO100. I really should have bumped the ISO up since the sun was going down by the time we got to the tiger.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dphillips81 Goldmember 1,254 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Seward, AK More info | Dec 31, 2009 16:58 | #4 You were probably getting the 1/2000 @ 100 due to all the white snow refelcting light on the sensor. Once you filled the frame with the tiger that would have dropped the SS down if you were using auto or AV mode. That would account for the slight blur to the photo Dustin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2548 guests, 158 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||