Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 19 Jun 2005 (Sunday) 06:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 420 Speedlite overexposure problem

 
Carol32
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 19, 2005 06:44 |  #1

I am baffled by sometimes getting photos flooded with light, so over-exposed they are not usable at all (other times under-exposed.) Is there some setting I have accidentally pressed that is causing this? It is intermittent--maybe 5-10% of the time only. It occurs in darkened rooms when I am not very close to the subject. I have a Canon Rebel XT with 420EX Speedlite. Thanks in advance for any enligtenment!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jun 19, 2005 12:41 |  #2

One typical time when you see this is at a wedding with a white bridal dress and a black tuxedo. The difference in reflectiveness of the subject can throw off exposures quite a bit. Check to see if your subject had a lot of black or white.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Carol32
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 19, 2005 13:30 as a reply to  @ robertwgross's post |  #3

I have since checked my settings and still can't figure out what caused this. Example:

1) Photo#1: 1/15 & 4.0 aperture, ISO 400 - badly over-exposed
2) Photo#2: 1/15 & 4.0 aperture, ISO 400 - slightly under-exposed. Same setting exactly, fairly dark room, both photos about 12 feet away from subject

I am not sure whether they were taken on the "P" or automatic setting. Both appear to have the same settings but the histograms were totally different. Any thoughts?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Jun 19, 2005 13:52 as a reply to  @ Carol32's post |  #4

Carole32 -- your images were not included in your post...


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jun 19, 2005 16:22 as a reply to  @ Carol32's post |  #5

Carol32 wrote:
I am not sure whether they were taken on the "P" or automatic setting. Both appear to have the same settings but the histograms were totally different. Any thoughts?

If you look in the EXIF data for each image, you will see whether it was P or any other mode, and exactly what the settings were. All that tells you is how the camera thought it was setting everything. However, if some weird thing happened, e.g. if the lens malfunctioned, then all bets are off. If a lens was supposed to stop down to f/4, but if it were "hanging" and stayed wide open at f/1.8, then that would explain an overexposure. All you know for sure is that the histogram, after the fact, showed the overexposure, but you don't yet know what mechanism led to that.

If a Speedlite is not fully charged up to fire, then sometimes it fires with a low power, but that does not explain your symptom, which is the other way. If you had a loose data connection between the camera and the Speedlite, then that would explain a few things. If you have a Canon friend to help, move the Speedlite to his camera and move his Speedlite to your camera. If the symptom starts moving around, that suggests that it was your Speedlite in trouble. If the symptom does not move, then that suggests that it was something closer to your own camera. Sometimes your local Canon dealer can be a friend for something like this.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Jun 19, 2005 17:57 as a reply to  @ robertwgross's post |  #6

Carole,
Does the pop-up flash on the camera give you similiar inconsistant results?
As Bob suggested, check the EXIF data, it seems a bit odd you may be getting 1/15 sec shutter speeds with the flash in P or Auto modes.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 19, 2005 18:21 |  #7

I was getting massive overexposures the other day, it turned out that the flash wasn't seated on the camera properly.

Check to make sure your flash is fully charged before you take a picture, that's one obvious culprit.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberPet
Hiding Under a Rock
Avatar
4,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Piteå, Sweden
     
Jun 19, 2005 20:51 |  #8

I'm with tim... fresh batteries and make sure the flash is seated properly in the hot-shoe (lock it down). Also, it can give you different output depending on what type of metering you use and where you point it to meter.


/Petra Hall
Click here to view my geeky gear list
I shoot as much as possible in available light... sometimes, my flash is available – Joe Buissink

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Carol32
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 19, 2005 22:03 as a reply to  @ CyberPet's post |  #9

Wow, so many diverse responses. I could be the batteries which should have needed changing by now. I will change them and see if the problem persists. When this happens, the shutter feels like it's open an inordinately long time which I'm sure is what's causing the problem. I took many shots after this happened (it persisted for about 10-20 shots and then went back to normal. I rfeally appreciate everyone's input!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,545 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Canon 420 Speedlite overexposure problem
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1274 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.