Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 31 Dec 2009 (Thursday) 02:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should Image Stabilizer made inactive when using a tripod & remotely clicking

 
snowshine
Member
43 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 31, 2009 02:19 |  #1

Hello,
Mine EOS 40D kit lens 17-85 IS lens.

I find individuals in photos are not sharp even though I used a tripod and remotely clicking to avoid any camera shake. I have tried different apertures [Taken the photos in Av mode]

I wonder if I should make the IS [Image Stabilizer] redendant[Inactive] when using a tripod and remote clicking to obtain sharpness of the subjects. or the kit lens is hopelessly useless?

Thank you for your expert opinion.
Regards




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 31, 2009 02:21 |  #2

Any time you actually have the option to use a tripod and a cable release (or wireless release) then by all means do so.

The 35mm format may have been developed so photographers didn't have to drag around heavy tripods and such but if you have one and the occassion allows for its use, then use it! ;)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Dec 31, 2009 06:59 |  #3

Welcome to POTN!

In answer to your post subject title, yes, Canon recommends you turn off IS when using a tripod.

snowshine wrote in post #9294787 (external link)
I find individuals in photos are not sharp even though I used a tripod and remotely clicking to avoid any camera shake. I have tried different apertures [Taken the photos in Av mode]

I wonder if I should make the IS [Image Stabilizer] redendant[Inactive] when using a tripod and remote clicking to obtain sharpness of the subjects. or the kit lens is hopelessly useless?

Thank you for your expert opinion.
Regards

I apologize, but don't understand your full question 100%. However, if your camera is tripod mounted and you're using a remote trigger and your subjects are blurred, it's most likely your problem is your subject is moving. IS on or off won't help that. What shutter speeds are being used? What kind of environment / light are you shooting in? Are you outdoors in bright light on a tripod and still getting blurred people? Post a pic with exif intact. Also post a 100% crop of a part of a blurred person.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowshine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
43 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 31, 2009 08:58 |  #4

Hello CannedHeat,

You are correct the subject was not still especially when my shutter speed was less than 1\8sec in the photo I was referring to earlier.

But then

This photo for one example: ISO 160 f/5.6 shutter 1.3sec Tripod mounted camera. Photo taken before Sunrise. IS on the lens was not turned off.

Regards


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Dec 31, 2009 09:42 as a reply to  @ snowshine's post |  #5

What is your concern about the photo? First, it's hard to tell if this is a full image crop posted at such a small size. Second, 5.6 can be a shallow DOF which might contribute, not knowing what the focal point is.

However, I see enough detail in the background tree that has branches against the sky that to me, it looks like if the image were sharpened it might be ok.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Dec 31, 2009 11:53 |  #6

With the 17-85 I would definitely turn off IS while on a tripod. As far as your subjects being not as sharp as you would like a lot depends on shutter speed. If you are using a tripod with mirror lock-up that usually indicates a slower shutter speed. Slow shutter speeds and movement don't go well together.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,378 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Dec 31, 2009 12:42 |  #7

snowshine wrote in post #9294787 (external link)
Hello,
Mine EOS 40D kit lens 17-85 IS lens.

I find individuals in photos are not sharp even though I used a tripod and remotely clicking to avoid any camera shake. I have tried different apertures [Taken the photos in Av mode]

I wonder if I should make the IS [Image Stabilizer] redendant[Inactive] when using a tripod and remote clicking to obtain sharpness of the subjects. or the kit lens is hopelessly useless?

Thank you for your expert opinion.
Regards

The original Type I IS needed to be turned off when on a tripod. The Type II and later IS systems can detect being on a steady tripod and cut their function. You don't have to turn it off with the later types of IS and the instructions no longer direct it.

But even with a tripod, your system may not be stable enough for your requirements. Run more tests on the tripod using higher shutter speeds to see if it's still movement that's causing your problem.

Be sure, too, to watch your depth of field. In the linked photo, if you were expecting the background to be sharp, it looks like you were suffering depth of field problems.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowshine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
43 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Dec 31, 2009 15:00 |  #8

Thank you very much.
I presume my 17-85 IS kit lens should be Type II because I bought that with the 40D at the end of 2008. I will try few photos improving my shutterspeeds & depth of field and post back if still have any concerns

I can understand what was causing the problemfrom your posts.

Regards




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WaltA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,871 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada
     
Dec 31, 2009 17:02 |  #9

What may be confusing to some is that Canon (and some retailers and reviewers) state in the specs for any lens that you should turn IS off when you mount the camera on a tripod. Even the newest lens which apparantly can detect a tripod. The reason they're telling you to turn IS off is to save on your battery.

Nothing to do with the IS messing up your shot.


Walt
400D, 5D, 7D and a bag of stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 31, 2009 17:14 |  #10

Snowshine,

To really understand what your setup is capable of, run some tests in good light. Use Mirror Lockup (your manual will explain how to use it) and either a cable release or the self timer and focus on a stationary subject with a good area of contrast and detail that fills the circle at the center of the viewfinder. For this test it would also be helpful if there is items in the background and foreground as well. Take a series of shots at varying apertures and focal lengths (you can use f/8 as a "reference" aperture setting because it is likely to be one of the overall sharpest settings).

Compare the results at different viewing sizes up to 100% and you should get an idea of 1) How sharp you can expect your setup to get, 2) How different apertures and focal lengths can affect sharpness and 3) How different apertures comvined with focal lengths can affect the depth of field, that is, the area in front of and behind your subject that is in acceptable focus.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dick ­ Emery
Senior Member
Avatar
695 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 31, 2009 17:54 |  #11

It just needs a little sharpening that's all. I am not sure if it was meant to have the blue cast to it either. You can set auto white balance in a paint program to fix that if needed. If you set your profile to allow others to edit and post your photo I can upload a couple of examples for you to check out or alternatively I can email them if you like.


Canon 450D/XSi (Retired), Canon 70D, Canon 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 STM, Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS, Canon 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 EF-S IS, Canon 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6 EF II, Sigma 30mm F1.4, 430EX Mk I, Canon Powershot S2 IS, Canon Powershot S90 IS, Sigma 1.6x closeup lens.
My Flickr (external link)
www.maunders.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowshine
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
43 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 01, 2010 07:12 |  #12

Done it-Changed the profile to allow others to edit
Regards




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,062 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Should Image Stabilizer made inactive when using a tripod & remotely clicking
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2731 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.