Not to me, lol. How would that make a difference?
AceandDeuce Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 13, 2013 19:46 | #1786 Not to me, lol. How would that make a difference?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 13, 2013 19:49 | #1787 Ace and Deuce wrote in post #16294751  Not to me, lol. How would that make a difference? It makes sense that you would use live view when you use the tripod, NOT when hand holding. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 13, 2013 22:57 | #1788 From tonight. Canon 6D, 400 f5.6 + Kenko 1.4x TC. Auto-focussed at f8. ISO 400, 1/640, tripod mounted.  Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hi guys. Brand newby here. Just shot this and did a huge crop in LR5. No other post processing.  Moon001 by dynalmadman, on Flickr70D with kit 28-135mm, 135mm, f8, 1/30, ISO100, 2sec timer. This is fun! Michael What I had 10 years ago (All gone, don't ask.):
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Maverick7687 Member 41 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Sep 14, 2013 00:25 | #1790 First photo post here. Hope it's worthy.  Canon 40D | Canon 70-300mm USM IS | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 | Tamron SP 28-75mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Sep 14, 2013 07:29 | #1791 Roughly an 80% crop, was sitting on the patio and decided to aim upwards and get a shot of the moon, tried live view and decided to just use the viewfinder. This is an effective 2200mm shot.  Image hosted by forum (662274) © TeamSpeed [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 14, 2013 10:33 | #1792 ^^^^Nice shot, TS. How did you calculate the effective focal length? Adjusting for the 7D's crop factor gives you 500mm x 1.6 = 800mm. Then I assume you calculated the additional crop factor for the 80% crop, right? That's where my math skills fail me. I keep coming up with a factor that would make your shot closer to 4000mm, although I probably screwed something up. I'd be interested in knowing how to calculate that as I tend to make some serious crops. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 14, 2013 10:42 | #1793 M_Six wrote in post #16295930 ^^^^Nice shot, TS. How did you calculate the effective focal length? Adjusting for the 7D's crop factor gives you 500mm x 1.6 = 800mm. Then I assume you calculated the additional crop factor for the 80% crop, right? That's where my math skills fail me. I keep coming up with a factor that would make your shot closer to 4000mm, although I probably screwed something up. I'd be interested in knowing how to calculate that as I tend to make some serious crops. +1! Great detail in your shot. Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone14Pro, AppleTV4K, MacBook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Sep 14, 2013 14:53 | #1794 M_Six wrote in post #16295930 ^^^^Nice shot, TS. How did you calculate the effective focal length? Adjusting for the 7D's crop factor gives you 500mm x 1.6 = 800mm. Then I assume you calculated the additional crop factor for the 80% crop, right? That's where my math skills fail me. I keep coming up with a factor that would make your shot closer to 4000mm, although I probably screwed something up. I'd be interested in knowing how to calculate that as I tend to make some serious crops. I used a 2x and a 1.4x with the Sigma 50-500 OS on an APS-C.  Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denirouk Hatchling 3 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Sep 14, 2013 16:09 | #1795 Just received my new 55-250mm lens and the moon was looking very appetizing! 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Sep 14, 2013 16:38 | #1796 ^ Welcome! Way to try out the 55-250, it is a fickle lens. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 14, 2013 17:08 | #1797 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16296308 I used a 2x and a 1.4x with the Sigma 50-500 OS on an APS-C.  500mm x 2 x 1.4 (x 1.6 for the effective FOV) = 2240mm mixed optical and crop FOV Here was the full image, and it just about filled the frame completely vertically. I almost am considering springing for the Canon MKIII 2x, vs the Kenko I have. The lens + TC combos is giving me alot of CA at the edges of the frame. Most likely the cause of the lens though. Aha, I see. Your EXIF just reported 500mm, so I was assuming no TCs. Now it all makes sense with much easier math. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
STIC Goldmember 1,627 posts Gallery: 360 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 985 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand More info Post edited over 8 years ago by STIC. |  Permanent ban Moon 15.9.13 logo by SPD speedscene photography and design, on FlickrHand held/live view (have to for 2x converter)/ Tamron 2x converter/ 100-400L/ 7D ISO 400/f11 (again, have to with converter) 7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 16, 2013 19:45 | #1799 Waxing Gibbous 9.16.13  Waxing Gibbous 9.16.13 c 2935 by ptcanon3ti, on FlickrPaul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agentmorgan Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Aug 2013 Location: NC More info | ISO 100 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1032 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
