Thanks, Charles....
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info | Thanks, Charles....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 05, 2016 05:39 | #3872 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17996301 I finally found the photos I took of the "Supermoon" eclipse from September 27 of last year. Taken with my Nikon D5200, with the kit 55-200mm lens at 200mm, on a standard tripod. Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=17996301&i=i254398194 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Very impressive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 05, 2016 21:54 | #3873 Nice sequence, Roy! Looks like you got the entire thing start to finish. Not an easy thing to do. I've always had clouds disrupt these blood moon eclipses, except for one time two years ago mid-April - and that was staying up until 5:30am. Worth it though, isn't it?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Roy A. Rust with reason 'Clarification of changes'. (2 edits in all) | May 06, 2016 00:09 | #3874 DavidWatts wrote in post #17997298 Nice sequence, Roy! Looks like you got the entire thing start to finish. Not an easy thing to do. I've always had clouds disrupt these blood moon eclipses, except for one time two years ago mid-April - and that was staying up until 5:30am. Worth it though, isn't it? Those vertical white lines are distracting to me. Much simpler image without; the sequence is self explanatory either way. I agree, I don't like them either, but didn't have any way to combine the photos without the lines. My Photoshop program won't work with Windows 10, so I just overlapped each photo and captured the image from the screen. Image hosted by forum (791428) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | May 06, 2016 07:18 | #3875 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17996301 I finally found the photos I took of the "Supermoon" eclipse from September 27 of last year. Taken with my Nikon D5200, with the kit 55-200mm lens at 200mm, on a standard tripod. Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17997382 I agree, I don't like them either, but didn't have any way to combine the photos without the lines. My Photoshop program won't work with Windows 10, so I just overlapped each photo and captured the image from the screen. If you have any suggestions about getting rid of the lines, please share them with me... Edit: Well, I think I found a way to get rid of the lines. Took a lot of messing with the image without Photoshop, but I think it looks better. Thanks for prompting me to work on it. ![]() Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17997382 I agree, I don't like them either, but didn't have any way to combine the photos without the lines. My Photoshop program won't work with Windows 10, so I just overlapped each photo and captured the image from the screen. If you have any suggestions about getting rid of the lines, please share them with me... Edit: Well, I think I found a way to get rid of the lines. Took a lot of messing with the image without Photoshop, but I think it looks better. Thanks for prompting me to work on it. ![]() Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=17997382&i=i152091963 forum: Astronomy & Celestial
Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Roy A. Rust. | May 06, 2016 08:33 | #3876 samsen wrote in post #17997577 Very nice image and result of a great effort in display. Unlike the other OP, the first version, by virtue of being "Unique", as I have never seen such an edit/college is totally different and very appealing to me as the subsequent version is what you commonly seen. To me lines are not distracting at all but highly synergistic though could be arranged a bit differently. Also to point out, unlike what is expressed, this is not a complete view of the even as it is not started and ended with full moon (The only phase of moon during which eclipse happens). So to me the event is incomplete, yet that doesn't bring down or reduce the appeal. Lastly, I am very surprise that without much knowledge of photoshop, how good you can show your images. This has to say a lot of good about the quality of original image in first place. Well the reason it's not the complete eclipse from fully illuminated in the east to fully illuminated in the west is because the eclipse had started before it cleared the hill/trees in the east. I had a view of it full after the eclipse, but just didn't think I needed to add a full moon at the end.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info Post edited over 7 years ago by samsen. | May 06, 2016 12:56 | #3877 ^^Roy: Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Davenn Senior Member More info | May 06, 2016 21:27 | #3878 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #17997382 I agree, I don't like them either, but didn't have any way to combine the photos without the lines. My Photoshop program won't work with Windows 10, so I just overlapped each photo and captured the image from the screen. If you have any suggestions about getting rid of the lines, please share them with me... Edit: Well, I think I found a way to get rid of the lines. Took a lot of messing with the image without Photoshop, but I think it looks better. Thanks for prompting me to work on it. ![]() Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=17997382&i=i152091963 forum: Astronomy & Celestial
A picture is worth 1000 words
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.R.M. Goldmember 2,800 posts Gallery: 720 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 14117 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia More info | May 07, 2016 05:51 | #3879 Moonrise over Brisbane city last Thursday morning. Stephen ----- flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 07, 2016 05:59 | #3880 S.R.M. wrote in post #17998473 Moonrise over Brisbane city last Thursday morning. I have also posted a nice timelapse of this here: https://vimeo.com/165508479 Thanks for looking! Cheers, Stephen ![]() Nice shot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.R.M. Goldmember 2,800 posts Gallery: 720 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 14117 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia More info | May 07, 2016 06:08 | #3881 Thanks very much! Stephen ----- flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2016 14:52 | #3882 Something different IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GYM1cHTo the moon Canon 5DMKIII, Canon 1D MKIII, 70-200 2.8 L IS, 24-70 f2.8 L, 300mm F2.8 L IS, Zeiss 135mm F2.0, EF 2x III, Samyang 14mm F2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.R.M. Goldmember 2,800 posts Gallery: 720 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 14117 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia More info | May 08, 2016 18:10 | #3883 rubmifer wrote in post #18000091 Something different ![]() To the moon Great colour in the contrail! Stephen ----- flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.R.M. Goldmember 2,800 posts Gallery: 720 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 14117 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia More info | May 08, 2016 18:14 | #3884 The thin crescent Moon was sitting in the middle of the Hyades star cluster in the constellation Taurus last night. This is the closest Open Cluster to the Earth, approximately 153 light years away. Stephen ----- flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 09, 2016 03:51 | #3885 S.R.M. wrote in post #18000288 Great colour in the contrail! Thx! Credits to the setting sun for those colours though. Canon 5DMKIII, Canon 1D MKIII, 70-200 2.8 L IS, 24-70 f2.8 L, 300mm F2.8 L IS, Zeiss 135mm F2.0, EF 2x III, Samyang 14mm F2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1413 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||