The support bracket for me was a waist of money. I got a new much better tripod
Ahhhh sorry to hear that but that tripod looks pretty damn sturdy though....
<tuffty/>
Sep 26, 2016 12:39 | #4156 Inspeqtor wrote in post #18141012 The support bracket for me was a waist of money. I got a new much better tripod Ahhhh sorry to hear that but that tripod looks pretty damn sturdy though....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | With the new tripod I can hand focus my 150-500 lens at 500 with very little shaking. My older Manfrotto shook violently every time I tried to hand focus. The build of the tripod made a world of difference. Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IronWolfPrintz Senior Member More info | Sep 28, 2016 06:40 | #4158 This is a little more than a week lot of shots as some nights it was up way too late for me. Image hosted by forum (816428) © IronWolf Printz [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. I am willing to learn and will listen to what other have to say.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 29, 2016 16:16 | #4159 A rising waning crescent moon at about 6 AM this morning. Image hosted by forum (816636) © fotoi [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Sep 29, 2016 23:51 | #4160 fotoi wrote in post #18143908 A rising waning crescent moon at about 6 AM this morning. Hosted photo: posted by fotoi in ./showthread.php?p=18143908&i=i36597482 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Nice!! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
By-tor Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 01, 2016 22:36 | #4162 Image hosted by forum (817002) © By-tor [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (817003) © By-tor [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2016 18:28 | #4163 Canon 50d , 70-200 is w/2x extender. Image hosted by forum (817171) © lijoec [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2016 18:31 | #4164 not happy with this one, but I love the color Image hosted by forum (817172) © lijoec [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
derek2112 Junior Member 28 posts Likes: 521 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Caledonia, ON CANADA More info | Oct 03, 2016 15:30 | #4165 Not my area of shooting, but everyone takes a moon shot at one point or another....so here's my contribution. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GiF6Ryhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/boboderek/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info | Oct 04, 2016 03:31 | #4166 Crescent Moon and Venus Image hosted by forum (817393) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 05, 2016 19:05 | #4167 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #18137371 It's hard to get a precise focus on a bright object like the moon or one of the planets. But you don't need any fancy techniques or equipment, either. I've learned that ... I can't believe a really high-end camera like the Canon EOS 7D Mark II doesn't have an articulated LCD screen. ... It's precisely BECAUSE it's a high-end camera that it doesn't have an articulated LCD. IMO it would be too fragile for the things most people put theirs through on the sidelines or in the woods. It's fine on my SX-50, but I'm glad the 7D doesn't have it. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info | Hey - they DO fold flat against the back of the camera for when you're on the sidelines or in the woods! You don't have to leave them sticking out where they would be "fragile".......
LOG IN TO REPLY |
STIC Goldmember 1,627 posts Gallery: 360 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 985 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand More info | Oct 05, 2016 19:30 | #4169 Permanent banarcher1960 wrote in post #18149369 It's precisely BECAUSE it's a high-end camera that it doesn't have an articulated LCD. IMO it would be too fragile for the things most people put theirs through on the sidelines or in the woods. It's fine on my SX-50, but I'm glad the 7D doesn't have it. Couldn't agree more... 7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
andicus Senior Member 314 posts Likes: 140 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Oct 05, 2016 21:25 | #4170 I consider the full frame cameras to be high end. I love my 7d, which I consider mid-range, but would love it even more with an articulated LCD screen.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1012 guests, 112 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||