Shot a full moon tonight... 
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 6 years ago by navydoc. | Oct 06, 2017 01:07 | #4651 Shot a full moon tonight... Image hosted by forum (879537) © navydoc [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2017 04:12 | #4652 Harvest Moon from the North East of England, last night 5th Oct 2017. Image hosted by forum (879553) © Kenhy [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. MY Setup:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandwedge Goldmember More info | Oct 06, 2017 08:15 | #4653 Brylek wrote in post #18466182 ![]()
2.IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1588-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A 3.IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1902-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A 4.IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1919-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A 5.IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1935-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A http://www.flickr.com/photos/63710159@N07/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Oct 06, 2017 09:42 | #4654 Kenhy wrote in post #18467041 Harvest Moon from the North East of England, last night 5th Oct 2017. Hosted photo: posted by Kenhy in ./showthread.php?p=18467041&i=i98060862 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Beautiful!! Job well done Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Oct 06, 2017 09:45 | #4655 sandwedge wrote in post #18467145 I love this shot, Brylek. Well Done! I've gotten a few shots this week, but nothing as spectacular as your shot! 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1935-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A I do not live anywhere close to a flight path. I am very jealous! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2017 10:56 | #4656 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #18466965 No need to shoot you... I'd rather shoot the moon since it's about the only thing available on nights when the moon is nearly full! The shutter speed pretty well took care of any hand-held induced movement. It's kind of hard to tell about the focus due to its size, though, but looks pretty good for hand-held. Did you also let the lens focus itself?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2017 10:59 | #4657 sandwedge wrote in post #18467145 I love this shot, Brylek. Well Done! I've gotten a few shots this week, but nothing as spectacular as your shot! 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. https://photos.smugmug.com …2017-1935-XL.jpg&lb=1&s=A
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RolyRatman Senior Member More info | Oct 06, 2017 20:40 | #4658 I'm loving all the aircraft flying past the moon photo's, I've only been lucky enough to catch it once and that was during the day
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Oct 06, 2017 23:43 | #4659 RolyRatman wrote in post #18467542 I'm loving all the aircraft flying past the moon photo's, I've only been lucky enough to catch it once and that was during the day ![]() And whilst I am here, I thought I would post one from last night's harvest moon. ![]() ![]() Great job on both pictures! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info | Oct 07, 2017 11:20 | #4660 I took the telescope out last night to see what I could do with it. The first was at 2310mm, and the second was at 3234mm, using my Meade ETX 125 scope. Image hosted by forum (879764) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (879765) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Oct 07, 2017 12:29 | #4661 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #18467859 I took the telescope out last night to see what I could do with it. The first was at 2310mm, and the second was at 3234mm, using my Meade ETX 125 scope. Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=18467859&i=i10818673 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=18467859&i=i173621309 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Nice images! Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyA.Rust Rest peacefully in the Celestial infinity More info | Oct 07, 2017 22:45 | #4662 Tareq wrote in post #18467895 Nice images! Explain to me, the EXIF data above each image showing that you used Nikkor 18-55mm lens, is that a mistake? Second, that telescope has 1900mm focal length, how did you get 2310mm and 3234mm with it? First: Thanks for the compliment about the images. To get the posted pictures into my gallery, it's necessary to select a lens from the choices POTN offers. But telescopes aren't listed in the choices for the lens used, so I picked a lens that was obviously not what I had used. I used the Meade ETX 125 telescope. Image hosted by forum (879855) © Roy A. Rust [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WestCoastCannuck Senior Member More info | Oct 07, 2017 23:03 | #4663 flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Oct 08, 2017 12:11 | #4664 Roy A. Rust wrote in post #18468169 First: Thanks for the compliment about the images. To get the posted pictures into my gallery, it's necessary to select a lens from the choices POTN offers. But telescopes aren't listed in the choices for the lens used, so I picked a lens that was obviously not what I had used. I used the Meade ETX 125 telescope. Second: You're right! The telescope with the short T-Adapter for my camera has a 1900mm focal length, but the adapter has an extension tube that increases the focal length to 2310mm. Then, I added a 1.4x teleconverter to that, which increased the focal length to 3234mm. The image below is a screen capture from the manual for the Meade ETX telescopes, with the focal lengths listed with the short adapter and with the extension inserted... And that's how my photos were taken at 2310mm and 3234mm focal lengths. Also, the focal lengths given in the manual are for 35mm cameras. Since my camera has a smaller sensor, it has a 35mm equivalent conversion factor of 1.5... So if that is factored in, the 2310mm focal length converts to 3465mm, and the 3234mm focal length is equivalent to a photo taken with a 4851mm telephoto lens on a 35mm camera!!! The numbers just keep getting bigger and bigger. Hosted photo: posted by Roy A. Rust in ./showthread.php?p=18468169&i=i69348620 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Thank you very much for your explanation! Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 09, 2017 13:56 | #4665 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1394 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||