Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 31 Dec 2009 (Thursday) 21:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The Official Shoot the Moon Thread

 
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Oct 10, 2020 12:58 |  #6616

Same night of that above or previous images.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/10/2/LQ_1067467.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1067467) © Tareq [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,535 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8147
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Oct 10, 2020 14:31 |  #6617

Tareq wrote in post #19136613 (external link)
Same night of that above or previous images.

Hosted photo: posted by Tareq in
./showthread.php?p=191​36613&i=i141409714
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

All of your Moon shots Tareq are fantastic! A telescope does the job a million percent better than any DSLR lens can do!


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Oct 11, 2020 15:15 |  #6618

Inspeqtor wrote in post #19136641 (external link)
All of your Moon shots Tareq are fantastic! A telescope does the job a million percent better than any DSLR lens can do!

Because i gave up doing photography since i started here, and i felt i have no chance to have something and i must travel the world or drive all far and around to have nice results, with so many people keep upgrading, so i felt like i have to give up photography and find another hobbies and passions, but my love to photography was strong so i chose a field that i can try my best and no need for me to drive or travel, and i found it, and good about it is that although people are also upgrading with astro gear, but it doesn't need to be the best out there, and the change or upgrade isn't that fast as in photography, i bought H4D back in 2009, and now after 11 years it is no longer available and 60mp is available even with DSLR and mirrorless, no chance for me to keep upgrading in photography with nice results, so the moon and astronomy is my hope now.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,535 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8147
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Oct 11, 2020 16:13 |  #6619

Tareq wrote in post #19137118 (external link)
Inspeqtor wrote in post #19136641 (external link)
All of your Moon shots Tareq are fantastic! A telescope does the job a million percent better than any DSLR lens can do!

Because i gave up doing photography since i started here, and i felt i have no chance to have something and i must travel the world or drive all far and around to have nice results, with so many people keep upgrading, so i felt like i have to give up photography and find another hobbies and passions, but my love to photography was strong so i chose a field that i can try my best and no need for me to drive or travel, and i found it, and good about it is that although people are also upgrading with astro gear, but it doesn't need to be the best out there, and the change or upgrade isn't that fast as in photography, i bought H4D back in 2009, and now after 11 years it is no longer available and 60mp is available even with DSLR and mirrorless, no chance for me to keep upgrading in photography with nice results, so the moon and astronomy is my hope now.

Have you been looking for the footprints left behind by Neil? <smyle>


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackRR
Senior Member
252 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Likes: 508
Joined Aug 2020
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 11, 2020 16:44 |  #6620

Does anyone know what theoretical length and aperture would be required to see the landing site?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 11, 2020 17:29 |  #6621

BlackRR wrote in post #19137160 (external link)
Does anyone know what theoretical length and aperture would be required to see the landing site?

It would take about a 400 meter (one-quarter-of-a-mile) aperture to resolve the flag from terrestrial earth (and require perfect seeing conditions).

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackRR
Senior Member
252 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Likes: 508
Joined Aug 2020
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 11, 2020 19:10 |  #6622

Cheers...

Wouldn't like to guess the price tag on that....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Oct 11, 2020 20:38 |  #6623

Inspeqtor wrote in post #19137143 (external link)
Have you been looking for the footprints left behind by Neil? <smyle>

I will never bother myself about it, i don't want to see any artificial things in the space, not on the moon, not on Mars, not anywhere, maybe ISS is the only thing, but i hope i stay away from human things out in the space, and moon landing things, well, i passed that, NASA has everything if they care to show or share the truth.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Oct 11, 2020 20:39 |  #6624

BlackRR wrote in post #19137199 (external link)
Cheers...

Wouldn't like to guess the price tag on that....

In fact you wouldn't guess the SIZE of that first actually, so better just build another shuttle and go there to check out.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidWatts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,501 posts
Gallery: 128 photos
Likes: 2572
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Area
     
Oct 11, 2020 22:57 |  #6625

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken many images of the Apollo lunar mission landings from 1969 into the 70's. Footprints and rover tracks are all visible. It would be almost impossible to image them from the Earth's surface. Believe it or not, even the Hubble Telescope cannot resolve those. Only a very accurate Lunar salellite can accomplish this. The flags have probably been destroyed by now from decades of intense solar radiation.


My Smugmug site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Oct 11, 2020 23:05 |  #6626

DavidWatts wrote in post #19137249 (external link)
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken many images of the Apollo lunar mission landings from 1969 into the 70's. Footprints and rover tracks are all visible. It would be almost impossible to image them from the Earth's surface. Believe it or not, even the Hubble Telescope cannot resolve those. Only a very accurate Lunar salellite can accomplish this. The flags have probably been destroyed by now from decades of intense solar radiation.

Or a meteor on that region of the flag, who knows.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackRR
Senior Member
252 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Likes: 508
Joined Aug 2020
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 12, 2020 00:14 |  #6627

DavidWatts wrote in post #19137249 (external link)
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken many images of the Apollo lunar mission landings from 1969 into the 70's.

I'm just old enough to have actually seen the 1969 landing as it happened, although I was under 1 and sitting on my mums knee at the time...;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidWatts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,501 posts
Gallery: 128 photos
Likes: 2572
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Area
     
Oct 12, 2020 01:39 |  #6628

BlackRR wrote in post #19137268 (external link)
I'm just old enough to have actually seen the 1969 landing as it happened, although I was under 1 and sitting on my mums knee at the time...;-)a

Watched it live on my "portable" 15" all-vacuum tube B&W TV in the kitchen at 13 years old. Was up until I think 3:30AM to watch the action unfold. It didn't matter that we didn't own a color TV since the camera on the lunar surface was B&W anyway. Also watched the liftoff from the moon live a day or so later. Fun times.


My Smugmug site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
truecolors
Senior Member
Avatar
300 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 149
Joined Aug 2008
Location: New Mexico
     
Oct 12, 2020 07:12 |  #6629

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19133034 (external link)
Hell (upper right) and Tycho shot with Meade 16" SCT at my astro club and my ZWO ASI294


Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=191​33034&i=i222640490
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=191​33034&i=i140303182
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

A meade 16" SCT ..........Wow, just wow. Nice pictures too.


Sheron
Have some stuff, want more stuff, need a good eye.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
Post edited over 3 years ago by navydoc.
     
Oct 12, 2020 07:27 |  #6630

BlackRR wrote in post #19137268 (external link)
I'm just old enough to have actually seen the 1969 landing as it happened, although I was under 1 and sitting on my mums knee at the time...;-)a

This photo, taken in November of 1969, shows the Philco RCA 24" color TV we watched the Apollo Moon landing on. That's me and my daughter in front of it.

EDIT: On further reflection, I believe the TV was made by RCA rather than Philco.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/10/2/LQ_1067767.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1067767) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,000,906 views & 15,005 likes for this thread, 1164 members have posted to it and it is followed by 303 members.
The Official Shoot the Moon Thread
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1308 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.