(dual exposure to show Earthshine)
011A1393FB
] by Marco Nero on Flickr
0U7A7102LC5
] by Marco Nero on Flickr
nero_design Senior Member  More info Post edited over 2 years ago by nero_design. (3 edits in all) | Feb 22, 2021 06:31 | #6916 (dual exposure to show Earthshine) 011A1393FB ] by Marco Nero on Flickr 0U7A7102LC5 ] by Marco Nero on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer"  More info | Feb 22, 2021 18:25 | #6917 I miss shooting the moon, hopefully sooner or later, nice images from everyone here. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2021 22:34 | #6918 Handheld shot from yesterday afternoon 420mm RAW, then converted to DNG and opened up in LR5 slight correction work before exporting to Topaz AL for de-noise work then back into LR5 for the final touch up and cropping by 60% then saving a Jpeg.  Image hosted by forum (1089589) © Pagman [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnfosteruk Goldmember  More info | Feb 23, 2021 04:52 | #6919 I had a go at the moon last night for the first time in ages and I decided to use the proper equipment, so I set my Skymax 102 scope outside to cool for an hour and captured a bunch of frames to sort and stack. Here's the result.  Image hosted by forum (1089613) © johnfosteruk [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times  More info | Feb 23, 2021 12:50 | #6920 johnfosteruk wrote in post #19199427 I had a go at the moon last night for the first time in ages and I decided to use the proper equipment, so I set my Skymax 102 scope outside to cool for an hour and captured a bunch of frames to sort and stack. Here's the result. Not bad considering there was a thin layer of haze in front of everything. 
 Hosted photo: posted by johnfosteruk in ./showthread.php?p=19199427&i=i115376167 forum: Astronomy & Celestial You call it not bad. I call it FANTASTIC!!!! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2021 14:02 | #6921 Inspeqtor wrote in post #19199636 You call it not bad. I call it FANTASTIC!!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnfosteruk Goldmember More info | Feb 23, 2021 14:13 | #6922 Inspeqtor wrote in post #19199636 You call it not bad. I call it FANTASTIC!!!! Park Ranger wrote in post #19199677 What he said ^! Thanks Chaps.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
buddy4344 OM System Ambassador  More info | Feb 23, 2021 14:56 | #6923 Playing with a pre-production copy of Olympus 150-400 with internal 1.2 tc. Cold night, but wanted to try out this lens on a quick moon shot. I'm once more happy with how the lens performs. I rotated for compositional change. Shots with Olympus EM1X with preproduction 150-400mm with internal 1.2x tc engaged at 500mm (1000mm equivalent), handheld, silent shutter, 1/300 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200, EV 0  Image hosted by forum (1089705) © buddy4344 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Buddy4344
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Feb 23, 2021 16:10 | #6924 buddy4344 wrote in post #19199718 Playing with a pre-production copy of Olympus 150-400 with internal 1.2 tc. Cold night, but wanted to try out this lens on a quick moon shot. I'm once more happy with how the lens performs. I rotated for compositional change. Shots with Olympus EM1X with preproduction 150-400mm with internal 1.2x tc engaged at 500mm (1000mm equivalent), handheld, silent shutter, 1/300 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200, EV 0 
Hosted photo: posted by buddy4344 in ./showthread.php?p=19199718&i=i186019227 forum: Astronomy & Celestial How were you able to get a pre-production copy? This lens is not yet available to the public then, correct? Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2021 18:45 | #6925 buddy4344 wrote in post #19199718 Playing with a pre-production copy of Olympus 150-400 with internal 1.2 tc. Cold night, but wanted to try out this lens on a quick moon shot. I'm once more happy with how the lens performs. I rotated for compositional change. Shots with Olympus EM1X with preproduction 150-400mm with internal 1.2x tc engaged at 500mm (1000mm equivalent), handheld, silent shutter, 1/300 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200, EV 0
Hosted photo: posted by buddy4344 in ./showthread.php?p=19199718&i=i186019227 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Rub it in.!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used"  More info | Feb 23, 2021 19:28 | #6926 Heya,  Tycho_Maria_Gassendi_200mmF7_RGB_224MC_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on Flickr Maria_PalusSomni_200mmF7_224MC_RGB_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on Flickr Plato_Copernicus_Iridum_200mmF7_RGB_224MC_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on FlickrC8 Edge + 0.7x Reducer (F7) with ASI224MC + Astronomik UV/IR (L) filter (undersampling on purpose for a wider FOV) 150 FPS for 120 seconds, kept best 601 frames per panel Each panel is a mosaic of 2 to 3 panels  Image hosted by forum (1089739) © MalVeauX [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Very best,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2021 20:59 | #6927 MalVeauX wrote in post #19199808 Heya, More high saturation lunar surface experiments. I think I have the workflow down to reproduce similar color mixes finally. Tycho_Maria_Gassendi_200mmF7_RGB_224MC_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on Flickr Maria_PalusSomni_200mmF7_224MC_RGB_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on Flickr Plato_Copernicus_Iridum_200mmF7_RGB_224MC_601frames_02232021 by Martin Wise, on FlickrC8 Edge + 0.7x Reducer (F7) with ASI224MC + Astronomik UV/IR (L) filter (undersampling on purpose for a wider FOV) 150 FPS for 120 seconds, kept best 601 frames per panel Each panel is a mosaic of 2 to 3 panels 
Hosted photo: posted by MalVeauX in ./showthread.php?p=19199808&i=i44031583 forum: Astronomy & Celestial Very best, Looks really good to me. Proper I guess.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Feb 23, 2021 23:04 | #6928 Park Ranger wrote in post #19199845 Looks really good to me. Proper I guess. What’s that ol’ Saying? “You got it-break the knob off!”  I have never heard of this saying.... what knob are you saying he should break off?? Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 24, 2021 09:35 | #6929 Inspeqtor wrote in post #19199889 I have never heard of this saying.... what knob are you saying he should break off?? I think it means something to the extent that once you have it dialed in correctly, then don’t keep fussing with it (break the knob off so you can’t turn it anymore)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Feb 24, 2021 12:04 | #6930 Park Ranger wrote in post #19200021 I think it means something to the extent that once you have it dialed in correctly, then don’t keep fussing with it (break the knob off so you can’t turn it anymore) Similar I suppose to, if it ain’t broke don’t try to fix it. I just meant that I liked where it was at. Gotcha! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 697 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
