Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 19 Jun 2005 (Sunday) 18:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20D and 580EX - underexposures are the rule

 
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 21, 2005 05:06 |  #16

Confalone wrote:
I find my 20D and the 580EX always underexpose by 1-2 stops when I shoot on the green rectangle. The ONLY solution to get properly exposed shots is to use P and set the Flash Exposure Compensation to 1 -1/2 stops. This gives fine exposures in general. My question is: Is this what others are finding tp be the case? My little DIgital Elph SD10 gives terrific exposures on point and shoot, so why doesn't the green rectangle on the 20D / 580 EX do as well? THX in advance.

Try taking the picture again but this time, try not to get the flash light bouncing off the glass of the china cabinet. I'm sure if you took the same shot with your SD10, it would come out even darker. Of course, you can prove me wrong by posting a sample of a shot from the SD10 (of the same china cabinet and flowers) here, too. ;)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Rabin
Goldmember
1,496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: NJ
     
Jun 21, 2005 05:25 as a reply to  @ post 613082 |  #17

There is nothing wrong with your gear. Get camera out of P

Well, good advice so far. Here's more to ponder. When I remember to do this, keeping camera in M (80% of time for flash) or Av (20%), flash exposures with Canon E-TTL II are best in my life. Don't shoot P with Canon flash photography. Old photojournalist taught me:

"Use shutter speed and/or ISO to properly expose the background and use f/stop and flash to expose the foreground."

First, get your camera out of P, where you are in control of nothing. Second, take that same scene and get a single focus point over foreground flowers. Then progressively modify shutter speed. Then progressively modify ISO. What you will find is that flash output stays the same(!) on foreground flower subject, as it should, while background at higher ISO or slower shutter will hit a setting where it is properly exposed. After a while, you get to geshtalt a scene with camera in M before the shot.
There is a famous series of tests to prove this works. I think they were called the Teddy Bear Tests at Nikon's site.

I do this all the time at work, taking pictures of people (foreground) giving public presentations with a LCD PowerPoint projector (background). I meter and hold flash off camera.

Lastly, P or Av will give different background exposure depending on how much ambient light a Canon camera meters before the shot. High moderate ambient light (above about 10EV) results in auto fill-flash reduction. Canon's engineers DESIGNED their flash system to reduce background exposure, because I suppose they feel many people like that look.
Another reason to put camera in M when doing flash.

Canon does not document it's flash features well, thus there is a big learning curve. Read Scott Bergers "sticky" at the top of this flash forum. Read Photonotes.org. and read Frary's web site on canon auto fill flash.

Hope that helps. J.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OceanRider
Senior Member
Avatar
692 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Whitby, near Toronto
     
Jun 21, 2005 11:15 |  #18

I am also very frustrated/confused with my 580EX and my 20D together. Its either over or under exposed every time either on Av P. I was mistaken to think that just marring the two would produce as good as pics as my older P&S S50, no way. My S-50 made perfects shot everytime..this new combo is brutal. Every shot needs to be FEC'd in some way. I unerstand that each pic is really two exposures when using flash (the abminent background and the flashed forground.) Adjusting our exposures and FEC to change each, but I thought this 20D combo would do a much better job.

Oh well.


Canon 20D X 2 & 580EX
Canon EFS 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
LumiQuest Pro Max; Omnibounce; Newton Di100CR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OceanRider
Senior Member
Avatar
692 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Whitby, near Toronto
     
Jun 21, 2005 11:23 |  #19

this article was a GREAT help understand flash exposure. Amust read for the beginner. Pics included!

Here is a link I ran across that explains the use of fill-flash really well........easily understood and gives example pics which are worth a 1000 words!!

http://www.popphoto.co​m/assets/down...212003​11318.pdf (external link)

oh yeah.......it's in PDF format so you need the Adobe reader installed on your computer.......


Canon 20D X 2 & 580EX
Canon EFS 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
LumiQuest Pro Max; Omnibounce; Newton Di100CR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Confalone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
34 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 21, 2005 16:02 as a reply to  @ OceanRider's post |  #20

OK - here are the two shots. The darker one is the $ 2500 D20 580 EX and the lighter one is the $ 300 SD10.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 21, 2005 16:05 |  #21

Interesting. The shot from the baby camera is more even, but I think the shot from the real camera is better exposed. You might like to rotate pictures before you post them, it's annoying to look at them like that.

Have you tried my suggestion of using bounce flash with the catchlight up?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jun 21, 2005 16:06 |  #22

Which are you trying to expose correctly, the flowers or the fireplace? With direct flash at that distance, you're not going to get both. The SD10 overexposed the flowers - the white petals are completely blown. The 20D underexposed the fireplace.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Rabin
Goldmember
1,496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: NJ
     
Jun 21, 2005 16:21 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #23

Confalone.
You're posting again. Did you read my post on previous page? You do not understand the SLR E-TTL II flash system and the relationship between shutter speed/ISO for background and f stop/flash exposure for foreground. There's nothing wrong with your camera; it's not a point and shoot.
J




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 21, 2005 17:41 as a reply to  @ Confalone's post |  #24

Confalone wrote:
OK - here are the two shots. The darker one is the $ 2500 D20 580 EX and the lighter one is the $ 300 SD10.

If you were to ask me, I'd say that the 20D is exposing the picture just right and teh SD10 is over exposing the picture. I much prefer the 20D shot, but that's me. Maybe that's the reason I've never had any complaints about any of my flash pictures. I think they're spot one, personally. :)

Now, tell me, truthfully, is your living room (or whereever that shot was taken) really that bright as depicted by the SD10 shot? (If it were, then you wouldn't really have had the need to use the flash, I don't think. ;) )


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Confalone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
34 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 21, 2005 20:51 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #25

OK - I want to thank all of you for your helpful comments. I am concluding that my 20D is operating as Canon intended. I would have liked an idiot-proof point and shoot option [green rectangle] that gave acceptable flash pix. I now know that getting the correct exposures with flash is very difficult. The suggestions and links you have posted are a great help. THere are a lot of us out there that have found the 20D 580EX disappointing in this regard. I hope that I can learn to use the camera in P, M Av etc mode and get spot on exposures. All of my shots have been greatly improved by image processing in PS. I just didn't want to have to do this to all my picture, especially when I've taken a lot. The green rectangle should do better for routine, view once pictures. I'm not sending the camera back to Canon for evaluation. I have much to learn. I hope others will find this thread valuable. Pat Confalone




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 21, 2005 20:54 |  #26

Pat, I really think you should go back and read this entire thread again, and take note of the suggestions people made, and their explainations of why it's working as it is. Also, the link from the sticky thread that I linked to is also invaluable. By your last post it just doesn't sound to me like you've learned anything from this thread, which is a shame, because there's lots of good info here.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Jacobsen
Senior Member
704 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Colorado
     
Jun 23, 2005 13:35 as a reply to  @ post 612698 |  #27

Confalone wrote:
I thought the shot would be a challenge since it has the flowers in the foreground and the fireplace in the background [about 7 feet away] The wood is bleached oak, so it's pretty light. I haven't figured out M for flash yet, but I'll give it a try. How does it differ from P? There also is an M setting on the 580 EX. I don't know what that's about! THX for your help. Pat

Try the same shot, but utilize AV mode.

Utilizing Auto or P (without FEC), will, to the most part, only care about the foreground. The background will not be exposed to the appropriate shutter speed required. Particularly when utilizing P, if the background is dark, the shutter duration is probably at the minimum (1/60) for P mode. By evaluating the histogram, you'll know to switch over to Av to take the same shot.

Utilizing Av, the background will be correctly metered and your shutter speed will adjust accordingly. You may realize that you will need a tripod to keep the camera shake to a minimum *due to a slow shutter speed).

It's an easy test. Try the shot again in P and then Av and note the shutter speed difference when you utilize the same apeture in Av as the camera set in P. Also note if there is any change in the picture, you should see a difference - particularly in the background. You shouldn't see a difference with the foreground (flowers).

Now, if your subject isn't as willing (or static) as the flowers (like kids), you will probably want to use Tv instead of Av in order to inhibit subject (foreground) blur. Same game applies (except a mistake in P with moving subject can lose the "moment").


Todd Jacobsen
---------------
20D / Rebel T2

EF : 28 f1.8/ 50 f1.4/ 50 f2.5 Macro/ 85 f1.8/ 20-35 f3.5-4.5 USM
EF-L: 16-35 f2.8/ 24-70 f2.8/ 70-200 IS f2.8 / 100-400 IS f4.5 / 180 f3.5 Macro
EF-S: 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Confalone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
34 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 23, 2005 18:59 as a reply to  @ Todd Jacobsen's post |  #28

wow - the same shot is Av had a 4 sec shutter. Thanks to IS it wasn't too bad hand held. THe exposure was bright and not overdone, but I would have to use a tripod on this shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ska60te
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Sep 2004
     
Jun 24, 2005 13:50 |  #29

I usually shoot iso 200 125/sec. f5.6,f8.0 (manual mode!!!!) +2FEC try that as a "baseline" and tweak from there




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Jacobsen
Senior Member
704 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Colorado
     
Jun 24, 2005 14:30 as a reply to  @ ska60te's post |  #30

ska60te wrote:
I usually shoot iso 200 125/sec. f5.6,f8.0 (manual mode!!!!) +2FEC try that as a "baseline" and tweak from there

Good point, indoor shoots can (some people would use the word should) be set at iso400.


Todd Jacobsen
---------------
20D / Rebel T2

EF : 28 f1.8/ 50 f1.4/ 50 f2.5 Macro/ 85 f1.8/ 20-35 f3.5-4.5 USM
EF-L: 16-35 f2.8/ 24-70 f2.8/ 70-200 IS f2.8 / 100-400 IS f4.5 / 180 f3.5 Macro
EF-S: 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

19,762 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
20D and 580EX - underexposures are the rule
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1272 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.