Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Feb 2003 (Wednesday) 15:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Image profiles

 
gandini
POTN's April Fool!
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 35
Joined Apr 2001
     
Feb 19, 2003 15:16 |  #1

OK, Im being stupid here, so can someone clear this up for me?
I open a TIFF image in PS7.01 and attach a profile for color management. The image changes from dark to reasonable. I save the image as a JPG and in Windows (XP) Explorer it looks just fine. I post the image to this forum, or to my website and when viewed in IE6 it looks like the original image (dark) not the balanced image I see in PS or in Explorer.
What happening?

cheers,




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slejhamer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2002
     
Feb 19, 2003 19:20 |  #2

Gandini,

What do you mean by "attach"? I assume you mean converting to your workspace profile before editing. I don't know about XP's color management capabilities, but for viewing in a web browser or any application that is not ICC compliant I believe you should first convert your processed images to sRGB.

My basic G1 workflow includes:
1. Assign True Color G1 ICC profile during RAW conversion.
2. Open in Photoshop and convert to working color space, which is AdobeRGB for me.
3. After editing the file, if I want to save a JPEG, I convert to sRGB. This would include images saved for the web, or files I send to an online printing service such as Ofoto. For printing at home I keep the TIFF file in AdobeRGB.

If you don't have a G3 profile, I think you would simply open the untagged image and convert to your working space before post-processing.

Let me know if I am doing this incorrectly. Now that I have calibrated my monitor with a Spyder the colors seem very consistent, so I think I have it right.

Regards,


Mitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger_Cavanagh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Feb 20, 2003 12:26 |  #3

Mitch has it right. XP makes no difference to his recommendations.

Regards,


=============
Roger Cavanagh
www.rogercavanagh.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gandini
THREAD ­ STARTER
POTN's April Fool!
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 35
Joined Apr 2001
     
Feb 20, 2003 14:05 |  #4

Thanks to Mitch and Roger for the confirmation. Your confusion was due mainly to my poor use of the terms assign and convert. This is all new to me. There are no G3 color profiles (.icm files) as yet, but there is an S45 one, which is perhaps useful for working with G3 files.
My problem stems from the following issues:

Because of problems with Canon's G3 SDK, linear conversion of RAW files is not currently possible. However, PowerShovelII allows for the equivalent of Chris Breeze's linear conversion by choosing a gamma of 1.0 and some lookup table (a TIF file.) Absent a G3 LUT, I am using the neutral one provided with PSII. When I convert a G3RAW file using these parameters it comes out very dark (like I am told all linear images do.)
I open the TIF in PS7.01 and then assign an .icm file called AIM RGB=Trinitron D65 G1.00 available from the AIM website. The image still looks bad. I then have to perform some channel mixing but the image looks like crap. If I then save the file as a JPG it looks dark when I post it to the web.
From your post, I sense that I am missing some *conversion* steps. Maybe I should assign the G1.00 profile, then convert to sRGB, perform edits, then save as JPG. OR, perhaps I should assign the profile, perform edits, then convert to sRGB to save as JPG for the web...
Geez, I'm confused.

thanks anyway,




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger_Cavanagh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Feb 21, 2003 03:23 |  #5

Philip,

You might be interested to know that the G3 is listed as a supported camera in Adobe's new converter. If you'd like to email me a file, I'll convert it for you.

Regards,


=============
Roger Cavanagh
www.rogercavanagh.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gandini
THREAD ­ STARTER
POTN's April Fool!
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 35
Joined Apr 2001
     
Feb 21, 2003 11:43 |  #6

Roger_Cavanagh wrote:
Philip,

You might be interested to know that the G3 is listed as a supported camera in Adobe's new converter. If you'd like to email me a file, I'll convert it for you.

Regards,

Roger:
Thanks for the very kind offer. Chris Breeze just released a beta of 2.5a that does linear conversions for G3 files. Seems to work just fine after a very brief test. Also yesterday I seemed to make some progress on my learning curve about color space and management.
I do have a question for you though: It seems to me that the advantage of linear files is that you can edit in a color space that gives you more "range" of options with a linear image, but eventually you have to convert to some other color space to either print, or display on the web, etc. Huh?

cheers,




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger_Cavanagh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Feb 21, 2003 13:50 |  #7

gandini wrote:
I do have a question for you though: It seems to me that the advantage of linear files is that you can edit in a color space that gives you more "range" of options with a linear image, but eventually you have to convert to some other color space to either print, or display on the web, etc. Huh?

cheers,

Philip,

I'll start by answering the second part of your question first. Yes, you do convert from your working space for printing. Although with Photoshop you don't have to actually convert the image file as PS takes care of the conversion using the specified printer profile. If you are sending a file to someone for printing, you might do the conversion so that the correct profile is embedded.

Images on the web are usually best converted to sRGB. However, some people use this as their working space, so, of course, no conversion would be needed.

It's my understanding that linear space gamut for the D30 (and presumably other cameras using raw, but I don't know for a fact) is wider (at least, for some colours) than spaces such sRGB or Adobe RGB. So in the beginning you can work in a wider space such as Wide Gamut RGB or Prophoto RGB. But, at some point, you have to give it away, but I'd rather make that dcision myself in Photoshop than have it done at conversion.

Regards,


=============
Roger Cavanagh
www.rogercavanagh.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyE
Senior Member
470 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Feb 22, 2003 18:20 |  #8

This might help:

http://www.powershot.c​om …t2/customer/fvu​patch.html (external link)

This is a patch for the File Viewer Utility to fix the problem where you get green images when converting S45 and G3 RAW images shot with a custom white balance.

I'm not sure that this is what you need, but it's probably a good thing to have.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,970 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Image profiles
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1204 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.