Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 04 Jan 2010 (Monday) 18:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Taken into custody.

 
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:41 |  #31

We could not profile a Nigerian on a watch list who had been to Yemen several times, paid cash and was traveling with no bags.

You said the "P" word...

Until we stop worrying about offending and start worrying about defending .. not much is gonna change. :(


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S30L28
Senior Member
Avatar
448 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: États-Unis
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:43 |  #32

john-in-japan wrote in post #9325311 (external link)
Are we not getting ahead of ourselves?
He was NOT arrested - They were NOT the police.
He was asked to delete the photos - he had a choice to make - comply with request or not comply.
No indication of rudeness on anyone's part. If taken from public property, no foul. Where is the beef?
OP had the option to comply or not comply with a request. Over reaction on the part of security - perhaps - perhaps not? OP gives minimal information on what was said, so really can't tell if these were security folks simply trying to do their job or worse. Getting "busted" was not true. Lets get the full story. What was said and what was done?
John

+1

I also feel that some information is being withheld from OP's post as well.


-Brian

Equipement d'appareil photo
Seller Feedback:1 (external link), 2 (external link), 3 (external link), 4 (external link), 5 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:45 |  #33

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #9325315 (external link)
You said the "P" word...

Until we stop worrying about offending and start worrying about defending .. not much is gonna change. :(

Nothing wrong with profiling people based on where they have visited (Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan etc), How they pay (cash), what they bring (no bags) and what list they are on (a terrorist watch list).

The Sikhs who work for me would be grateful if TSA would learn that turbans are not really associated with Islam.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:48 |  #34

JeffreyG wrote in post #9325349 (external link)
Nothing wrong with profiling people based on where they have visited (Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan etc), How they pay (cash), what they bring (no bags) and what list they are on (a terrorist watch list).

The Sikhs who work for me would be grateful if TSA would learn that turbans are not really associated with Islam.

Agree all the way around...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:51 |  #35

Karl Johnston wrote in post #9325232 (external link)
I can see and make out the make of my car in the driveway using google maps....

It didn't take but about 30 seconds to check out the chemical plant I worked in for 33 years. I see the new combined control room is in place (two years old). They also have the north fan shut down on the big cooling tower (used to help control water temps). And my buddy is still asleep in the office with his feet on the desk! Ha! Just kidding!


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:54 |  #36

lankforddl wrote in post #9324297 (external link)
Security of the refinery. Some in marked cars/clothing and a couple in unmarked. It was crazy how fast the converged on me and on a public street.

They can't take your equipment, or images, and they can ask for the moon...

That's not being busted... and you should have know better then to play around 911 hot spots.
Yes, the FBI still makes house calls, no joke.

Next time ask either the refinery, or contact your local FBI office, and tell them where and when you intend to shoot.
As long as your on public property, your within your rights.
Try not to make others nervous though, as it serves you no purpose.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpeters
Member
249 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Near St. Louis on the Illinois side.
     
Jan 04, 2010 20:58 |  #37

If you were truly restrained on a public street by a private security force then when are you planning on filing your unlawful restraint complaint? Even if you did not want to cause a confrontation with them on site - why didn't you call the police after you left?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gedanken
Senior Member
741 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:03 |  #38

If it happened the way the OP described it, I'd agree that it's over the top. That said, I don't disagree with them actually stopping the OP from taking photographs. All things being equal there nothing to say that the OP was not casing the joint for an attak, and an oil refinery can make a pretty spectacular mess.

As for the 9/11 terrorists blending in, nobody followed up on a bunch of guys who went to a flight school and showed no interest in landing a plane, and everybody ended up feeling pretty stupid after that. Taken from the security guys' point of view, would you want to look dumb for not following up on some guy walking round the refinery with a big camera if an attack did happen?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dispatchermike21
If you do it right, it doesn't hurt at all.
Avatar
2,447 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 114
Joined Dec 2004
Location: My 40D Burst Rate is Hitting 6.5 FPS in the Pacific NW
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:09 |  #39

We sure live in exciting times.


To take Pictures is a gift to post them on POTN is an Honor.

http://msunderlin.smug​mug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john-in-japan
Goldmember
1,208 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Kamogawa City, Chiba in Japan
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:14 |  #40

To the OP - Your thread title was "Taken into custody." True or False?
For Blackhawk - +1
John


JohnW
5D Mark II Dual Battery Grip, [COLOR=black], 200 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L II IS, 24-70 f/2.8L 180Macro f/3.5L[COLOR=black], 85 II f/1.2L[COLOR=black], 17-40 f/4L, 50 f/1.4, 50 f/2.5 Compact Macro, MPE-65, 550EX, 400L f.2.8L IS, 580EXII, Canon RingFlash, RRS Perfect Portrait Pkg., Velbon with PH275 and Slider, bunch of filters, Canon 1.4X & Having Fun! http://kamogawa.smugmu​g.com/external link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:17 |  #41

john-in-japan wrote in post #9325311 (external link)
Are we not getting ahead of ourselves?
He was NOT arrested - They were NOT the police.
He was asked to delete the photos - he had a choice to make - comply with request or not comply.
No indication of rudeness on anyone's part. If taken from public property, no foul. Where is the beef?
OP had the option to comply or not comply with a request. Over reaction on the part of security - perhaps - perhaps not? OP gives minimal information on what was said, so really can't tell if these were security folks simply trying to do their job or worse. Getting "busted" was not true. Lets get the full story. What was said and what was done?
John

Actually they were being polite as they could have just as easily observed covertly, taped his activities and vehicle + tag, then let 2 FBI field agents drop by a week or so later unannounced for a chat and to look at pictures... which is much more unnerving.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgoings
Member
91 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Ahwatukee Arizona
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:27 |  #42

john-in-japan wrote in post #9325544 (external link)
To the OP - Your thread title was "Taken into custody." True or False?
For Blackhawk - +1
John

exactly...drumming up some drama




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:35 |  #43

NeutronBoy wrote in post #9325017 (external link)
Sure, it's all ridiculous until something gets blown up ... don't you watch the news? These things are real, people are out there trying to get back at us. We ARE in a war status now and the enemy is in our country. Smell the coffee.

Wow, really? So can we search your house just to make sure we are safe from you.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lankforddl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:40 as a reply to  @ blackhawk's post |  #44

So wow, this sparked a heated conversation. Here's the info that some posts seem to want to know. I'm a student at the University of Minnesota. I was out on public roads photographing the winter scenery: farm fields, old tractors, and the refinery, etc... While driving down a very public frontage road near highway 52 in Rosemont, MN three security guards on foot flagged me down and surrounded my vehicle with their vehicles. Somewhere between 5-8 security personnel surrounded me and began the questioning. They were just doing what they're told to do, but I did feel very intimidated by their overwhelming presence. I was just happy to get out of there with my several K worth of gear. I was afraid that they were going to confiscate my camera equipment.

do a flickr search on "koch refinery" and there are tons of photos of this place.


5DIICAN17-40CAN50CAN85CAN100CAN135CAN70-200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kgoings
Member
91 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Ahwatukee Arizona
     
Jan 04, 2010 21:43 |  #45

lankforddl wrote in post #9325708 (external link)
three security guards on foot flagged me down and surrounded my vehicle with their vehicles.

So which is it? On foot or in vehicles? Were you "Taken into custody" as you claimed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,904 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it.
Taken into custody.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2720 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.