Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 05 Jan 2010 (Tuesday) 07:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Who includes "Digital Negatives"?

 
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 05, 2010 07:55 |  #1

I see a lot of photographers that deliver, "Digital Negatives" as part of a client's package. Those that do this, are they truly DNG files? (I've come across a few people that call the JPEG files they distribute, "Digital Negatives" which isn't true).

These files are large and I assume you're also giving out 1 or 2 versions of JPEG equivalents as well. How many DVD's are you typically giving out for say, a 500 photo package?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 05, 2010 13:34 |  #2

I don't know what I call them -- just depends on what the client asks for. If they ask for "digital negatives" I tell them that I include them in certain packages. But they are JPEGs.

In all pragmatic rights, they are digital negatives. The client can print from them. I've never once used DNGs for anything of my own. All my prints I've ever printed up for personal reasons have been from JPEGs.

500 JPEGs fit easily on a single DVD. I'm not sure I know what you mean about giving out 1 or 2 versions of JPEG equivalents...

Bobby


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jan 05, 2010 14:15 as a reply to  @ bnlearle's post |  #3

I don't think any of my clients would know WHAT to do with a raw (cr2 or DNG) file. If they did, and could load it up in ACR/LR, chances are the photos would end up NOT looking like what I come up with (unless I also give them the XMPs) Chances are they will badmouth me to everyone and complain about the colors being off :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 05, 2010 15:22 |  #4

People mean jpeg files when they use the phrase "digital negatives" in this context. If you give your customers dng files, which they don't need btw, they'll come back to you and tell you they can't open them. Means they can mess with them more easily too.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jan 05, 2010 15:23 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #5

I just call them what they are in my contract -
"High Resolution JPG files with a license to print for non-commercial purposes"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 05, 2010 17:35 |  #6

egordon99 wrote in post #9330727 (external link)
I just call them what they are in my contract -
"High Resolution JPG files with a license to print for non-commercial purposes"

Me, too. Everyone's clear and no surprises. I've never been asked for anything else.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 05, 2010 17:42 |  #7

tim wrote in post #9330718 (external link)
People mean jpeg files when they use the phrase "digital negatives" in this context. If you give your customers dng files, which they don't need btw, they'll come back to you and tell you they can't open them. Means they can mess with them more easily too.

Yeah, I know. :D I just see the phrase, "Digital Negatives" on a lot of web sites and was curious if those people knew that there actually is a file format for this type of file and that it isn't JPEG, And also... if they were living up to the true meaning of the phrase, how they were supplying DNG files because they are huge.

And unlike RAW files, anybody can open a DNG file with Adobe's free converter. That's why the DNG format was created.

Who would want them? Heck if I know.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 05, 2010 17:50 |  #8

Fair enough. But it's still completely correct to say digital negative in reference to jpegs. Just because Adobe came up says that DNG stands for digital negatives, that doesn't mean that's the ONLY way you can define "digital negative". In fact, I'd argue that digital negatives (when referred to as "digital negatives" and not "DNG's") are more often being referred to as JPEGs on a disk than DNG's. So at best "digital negatives" can have two meanings -- with the more accepted meaning being JPEGs on a disk ;)


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 05, 2010 18:02 |  #9

bnlearle wrote in post #9331731 (external link)
the more accepted meaning being JPEGs on a disk ;)

I think you're right. the DNG format wasn't invented until 2004(?) and I'm sure the term "digital negative" was used way before then.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 05, 2010 18:03 |  #10

RT McAllister wrote in post #9331688 (external link)
And unlike RAW files, anybody can open a DNG file with Adobe's free converter. That's why the DNG format was created.

The DNG converter converts propriety RAW files to DNG, it doesn't let people open them. They'd still need RAW processing software.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 05, 2010 18:46 |  #11

tim wrote in post #9331812 (external link)
The DNG converter converts propriety RAW files to DNG, it doesn't let people open them. They'd still need RAW processing software.

I did not know that. I thought it went both ways.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 05, 2010 21:33 |  #12

RT McAllister wrote in post #9332051 (external link)
I did not know that. I thought it went both ways.

Only in your dreams ;)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reminisce
Senior Member
Avatar
617 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Miami, FL
     
Jan 05, 2010 21:39 |  #13

On my packages and contracts, I list "Print CD/DVD" or "Photo CD/DVD" with "limited reproduction rights".
I give my clients high res JPEGs and inform them in the contract and package that they will print up to a certain size without quality loss. If they want to print higher than that size they need to order through my site. I never use "digital negatives" in my material because I've seen some people get finicky over understanding what that is and believing that means they have COMPLETE rights to all the images and I cannot use them for my own usage. To save myself from that headache, my keywords dont include the words "digital negative"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 05, 2010 22:06 |  #14

I don't mind the term because I give my clients that order a disc the full resolution images. They have private rights to them -- basically don't make money off them and we're cool :)


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jan 06, 2010 07:30 |  #15

It's another one of those buzz word phrases - the current (but fading?) fad in such words. Some stores still sell "digital film." :D - Stu

RT McAllister wrote in post #9331688 (external link)
Yeah, I know. :D I just see the phrase, "Digital Negatives" on a lot of web sites ,,,,,.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,236 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Who includes "Digital Negatives"?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
580 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.