gasrocks Cream of the Crop  13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:19 | #1 |
bohdank Cream of the Crop  14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:23 | #2 That seems to have come out of nowhere, no ? Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bradfordguy Senior Member 941 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Bradford, Ontario More info | Maybe now I can afford to upgrade my F:4 to a 2.8 IS Mark I. Doubt it..... G10, 7D gripped, 17-55 2.8 IS , 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, EF 85 1.8, 105 2.8 EX Sigma Macro, 1.4 TC , 580 EXII, 430 EX, ST-E2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JC4 Goldmember  2,610 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Columbus, Ohio More info | Oh man, mine sucks now. John Caputo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssracer Goldmember 1,855 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Louisville, KY More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:31 | #5 |
laydros Senior Member  444 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Raleigh, NC More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:31 | #6 Does this mean we are about to get Canon's CES announcements, or is this just one coming out early? Jason Hamilton - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2010 08:33 | #7 I will be selling selling mine as soon as it is actually available for sale. Sounds like the thing is actually optically different, unlike many Mark II designs. Teddy Smith, SOC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember  4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:36 | #8 0.21X looks good, as long as it's not a dog like the f/4L IS version at MFD Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember 4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:37 | #9 Bradfordguy wrote in post #9327881  Maybe now I can afford to upgrade my F:4 to a 2.8 IS Mark I. Doubt it..... +1 Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Houston1863 Senior Member  729 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: South East UK More info | Well it was kinda expected, wasn't it?  Houston  2x5D3, 16-35L, 24-70L, 70-200/2.8L IS,15 FE, 50L,100L, 2x580EXII, 1x430Exll, Fuji X10, YN-622Cs, Manfrotto Neotec legs, various bits and pieces, my Apples ( 2 living MacBook Pro, 1 dormant PowerBook G4 ), bags and bits of Think Tank stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember 4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 05, 2010 08:57 | #11 Mark 1 is a good lens but showing its age. Great Image quality but resolving power is getting pushed by newer sensors admittedly. Matters to pixel peeper and heavy croppers like me, but less so to photographers who don't need to crop like crazy Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop  20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Jan 05, 2010 09:00 | #12 Get this - according to Canon's web page Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JC4 Goldmember 2,610 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Columbus, Ohio More info | Whats up with that? Nickel and dimeing L lenses now too? We all expect the price to go up, but removing pieces is wrong. John Caputo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FLPHOTO Senior Member 315 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Florida More info | Jan 05, 2010 09:10 | #14 SkipD wrote in post #9328048 Get this - according to Canon's web page , the new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens is NOT SUPPLIED with a lens hood. It also uses a new ET-87 hood (the old lens uses an ET-86). So, add the price of the hood to the price of the lens.The press release says it is included - no worries. --- www.davidpugsleyphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
snoop99 Senior Member  588 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Arlington, VA More info | Jan 05, 2010 09:10 | #15 SkipD wrote in post #9328048 Get this - according to Canon's web page , the new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens is NOT SUPPLIED with a lens hood. It also uses a new ET-87 hood (the old lens uses an ET-86). So, add the price of the hood to the price of the lens.Probably cost $100 5D MarkII 70-200 IS F/2.8 II L, Canon 24-70 2.8 II L[COLOR=Red][COLOR=Black], Canon 17-40 L, Canon 50 F/1.4, Canon 2X II, 580EXII Canon S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 936 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
