two shots available lights with bounced sto fen diffused flash
tonyniev Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 05, 2010 22:30 | #1 two shots available lights with bounced sto fen diffused flash Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Jan 05, 2010 22:35 | #2 Both images could use a bit of straightening. I would like #2 if it didn't look like daylight. Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2010 23:08 | #3 thanks...again I missed the alignment. Do you prefer this night shot, no flash. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AmandaMarie Cream of the Crop 6,211 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Jan 06, 2010 00:05 | #4 Yes I do. Meow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
williejr Senior Member 746 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jan 06, 2010 01:27 | #5 Not sure I like the focal point on the first shot and the fire is blown out, no detail. For a second there, I thought the shot was out of focus. Then I realized you nailed the focus on the first candle and front of the placemat. Was that your intention? If you were trying to show a shallow dof, I would move to the side and shoot it at a lower angle. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikePrattPhotography Senior Member 522 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Jan 06, 2010 01:35 | #6 I like the night shot no flash better. Seems more realistic www.michaeloliveri.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crashthenet44 Senior Member 514 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Rails of the Lehigh Valley Line and Trenton Sub More info | Jan 06, 2010 07:00 | #7 DOF, composition, choice of background/placemat are all working against you in #1. The fireplace shot does nothing for me in either form. I fail to see what is supposed to grab the viewers interest in the shot. FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimage Senior Member More info | At the first one I would have changed perspective a bit. trying to lower the camera and playing with DOF... even focusing on first or middle... depends really. The uneven material of the candle holder could be a bit of promising material... I would play with it without flash for sure... with long exposure, and with a tripod. Kriszta
LOG IN TO REPLY |
okay on all thanks for looking and making these critiques. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pickupman92 Senior Member 698 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Orange City, FL More info | Jan 06, 2010 10:15 | #10 The flames look pretty blown out. Can you take a couple photos and merge them together to get that back? -Quentin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Re-shoot new photos: Candles and fire place the fireplace single shot stacked with photoshop: adding LR pp on an over slightly over exposed candles. My first try with LR Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Re-hot- new photos:Candles and fire place Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimage Senior Member More info | 1st I like more now. Great you changed the cloth under the candles. I could still work on the perspective, but that is just maybe me. Kriszta
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2010 00:08 | #14 thanks to all again, I am learning from all these comments. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jorogume Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: San José, Costa Rica More info | Mar 08, 2010 20:02 | #15 +1 Good improvement. The camera I own : Canon A720IS (P&S)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1632 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||