MJPhotos24 wrote in post #9341994
gotta ask why use them at full power if they're too hot to begin with like I think these are? I'm not familiar with these but know if my AB's are too hot and I'm at a low ISO and the settings I want they're going down, not full (1600's though).
The reason is flash duration. Very few strobes have a fast enough flash duration even at full power. Cutting the power just makes it worse. This gets compounded when the mindset is everything must be shot at f/2.8 which does not work out too well with most strobed applications. You virtually always see Getty, SI or any of the big players covering strobed sports at f/6.3 or stopped down even lower.
MDJAK wrote in post #9342941
The stands were right at the edge of the mat. Not much choice in that as further back is where the wrestlers warm up, and back on the other side is the grandstands.
Are you sure it is not possible to back them away from the mat a bit? That would really help you out. The further the lights are from your subjects, the less exposure variation you have as they move closer/further from you. This is part of the problem with the shots you posted. The only way to fix this is to either have the lights so far away that the change in distances as the subjects move is irrelevant (Generally not possible) or adjust your aperture on the fly during the match which takes some practice.
MDJAK wrote in post #9342941
Is it possible the "ghost" like images are just not warm enough wb wise? Because for the most part the histograms are not showing blowouts, or where it did I recovered most.
Not really. The problem is that you are blowing out the red channel in most of the images. Strobes are really good at blowing out reds. If you just look at your full histo, it will not show this because it does not register as blown until all the channels are blown. Most of the time it will look like your exposer is pretty solid. Look at the RGB histo and you will see that the reds are much hotter than the greens and blues. Blowing out the reds are what is killing the skin tones.
MDJAK wrote in post #9342941
Also, should I shoot at F4 or F5.6? Obviously that's what I'd have to do if I turned them up more.
Yes. People get too consumed sometimes in the mindset that all sports have to be shot at f/2.8 because of the backgrounds. While this is a good thing many times, it is not a carved in stone requirement. With your D3 and 70-200 set at 160mm, your DOF behind a subject 25 feet away is still only 4 feet even when shot at f/16. More than enough to keep the backgrounds nice and blurry.
Here is a link to some wrestling I did recently. The first four images are shot with (2) 600RX's on 13' stands virtually in the same setup you did. The only difference was I had the lights about 30 feet behind the edge of the mat. They all were shot at f/8-f/9 and I intentionally shot at ISO 400 so I could use a more stopped down aperture because with wrestling I like a wider DOF so both subjects are in focus.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=804244
Strobes change everything and you have to consider all settings.
If DOF control is a critical value or you can't get the lights back far enough to not have to shoot at f/22, you can fix this with simple ND gels over the flash heads which still let you use higher power (Faster flash durations) and knock down the light intensity.
MDJAK wrote in post #9343033
I got the box for portraiture. Do you think it would work for wrestling?
It would work fine but I would definitely not recommend it.
It would help knock down the intensity of the flash similar to the ND filter idea I mentioned above but will do very little to soften the light because the distance to the subject is still too far to really gain the softening benefits of light modifiers. Not to mention, it will make your stands considerably less stable and apt to be knocked over. No since running the risk of destroying a very expensive light mod just to knock down the light intensity when you can get the same result from a $5 ND gel and some gaffers tape.