Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 07 Jan 2010 (Thursday) 09:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Baby lighting question...

 
Thunderbird33
Senior Member
282 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Canada
     
Jan 07, 2010 09:04 |  #1

I have likely a simple question, but I just don't know the answer:

How do you create this kind of photo with a black background where you only pick up the skin and not the person's body that's holding the baby??

Here's a sample from a google search of what I mean:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I know I can dodge...or is it burn :) some stuff out....but is this a matter of the parent actually just wearing very dark clothing while being behind the baby in this photograph, or is it the specific angle of light?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrea31419
Senior Member
Avatar
342 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Tri-Cities, TN. USA
     
Jan 07, 2010 09:43 |  #2

Yes, the parent is either wearing dark clothing or you drape the black drop over the parent. Feather your light.




Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thunderbird33
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
282 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Canada
     
Jan 07, 2010 09:57 |  #3

andrea31419 wrote in post #9343542 (external link)
Yes, the parent is either wearing dark clothing or you drape the black drop over the parent. Feather your light.

I was really thinking about putting the backdrop over the parent, but was thinking THEY'D be thinking I was nuts!! :) Glad I checked first !!

Thanks so much!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hawk911
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,467 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1009
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
     
Jan 07, 2010 10:37 |  #4

This was done with Dad in black shirt, and no BG lighting. You can try either long or short sleeves, depending on the look you are after. Shot at f5.6, iso 100, Tv=1/160

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HAWK Photography Gallery (external link) FB Fan page (external link)|_My gear: 5d3, 70D & 40D (all gripped), 580exII, 550ex, Canon 24-70 L & 85 f1.8, 50mm f1.4; Tamron 70-200 SP Di VC, Canon 18-55, Sigma 1.4xtc; Elinchrom Whore, Skyport triggers, Speedotron BD and Kacey Grid, Vagabond minis

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LisaJH
Goldmember
Avatar
1,887 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2277
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Kingman, Arizona - United States
     
Jan 07, 2010 11:09 |  #5

Like the others mentioned, use a black blanket or have the parent holding the baby wearing black. Just use a levels adjustment, or the burn tool set to shadows, or a selective color layer with blacks selected to completely 'blacken' the black (so many ways to do it).


~Mom of 11 and Professional Photographer~
5DIV | 5DIII | 5DII | 40D | 400L | 200L | 70-200L II | 85L | 50 1.0L | 50 1.2L | Sigma 50mm Art Lens | 16-35L II | TS-E 90 | 100 Macro | Random Lensbaby & OCF Gear
Website (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrea31419
Senior Member
Avatar
342 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Tri-Cities, TN. USA
     
Jan 07, 2010 11:33 |  #6

Thunderbird33 wrote in post #9343632 (external link)
I was really thinking about putting the backdrop over the parent, but was thinking THEY'D be thinking I was nuts!! :) Glad I checked first !!

Thanks so much!

YW...I do this all the time...they don't seem to mind. :)




Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianAZ
Goldmember
Avatar
1,550 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jan 07, 2010 18:51 |  #7

Inverse square law. The closer your light source is to your subject, the more dramatic the falloff. The further your light source is to your subject, the more even the lighting.

So, if your light source is RELATIVELY far from your subject, and your subject is RELATIVELY, close to the parent holding them, then both will be fairly evenly lit. You don't want that. You want the relative distance from the light to your subject to be far closer than the relation of the light to the parent.


big light source -> really close to the baby -> gives nice soft light with RAPID falloff.


An example:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3297/3560151893_d2c8584848_o.jpg

The light source was about 5 inches from the baby, but about 15 inches from the parent. Relatively, the difference in distances is HUGE. At f/8 exposure on the baby, the proper exposure on the parent was about 5 stops less, effectively rendering them black.

Website (external link)
My Blog (external link)
facebook (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrea31419
Senior Member
Avatar
342 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Tri-Cities, TN. USA
     
Jan 07, 2010 21:05 |  #8

Very nice Brian.




Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,324 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Baby lighting question...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1761 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.