Agree with the majority, both excellent. However, the landscape version has that little bit extra for me.
SimonBl Senior Member  427 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Perth, Western Australia More info | Jun 22, 2005 08:17 | #16 Agree with the majority, both excellent. However, the landscape version has that little bit extra for me. Canon 5D Mk II, Canon 16-35 f/2.8L II, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L, Canon 70-200 f/4L IS, Canon 24-105 f/4L IS, 1.4x TC and 580EX.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 22, 2005 20:05 | #17 Well as is often the case I'm swimming against the tied. I prefer the portrait version. I feel the landscape version is way too symmetrical. Maybe if it were cropped differently?? Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc wrote: Well as is often the case I'm swimming against the tied. I prefer the portrait version. I feel the landscape version is way too symmetrical. Maybe if it were cropped differently?? KAC
Cameron........My Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenyc Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 23, 2005 05:04 | #19 Yeah they are both somewhat symmetric, but to me the landscape version emphasizes it moreso. Kenny A. Chaffin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1003 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
- 
