Today was a great day for photos... i got some great landscape and cityscape pics. But i also got this cool portrait of my fiance as well. I would love some C&C.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
Thanks,
Jon
JBroida Member ![]() 88 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: LA, CA More info | Jan 10, 2010 22:54 | #1 Today was a great day for photos... i got some great landscape and cityscape pics. But i also got this cool portrait of my fiance as well. I would love some C&C.
Thanks, Jon Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 60D, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 16-35 F4 IS L, Sigma 35 Art, Canon 24-105 L, Canon 60mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 100mm Macro IS L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoJo2fast Goldmember ![]() 1,759 posts Likes: 93 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Jan 10, 2010 23:56 | #2 This doesn't seem very HDR-ish at all. Maybe fix the WB a bit as she seems a little too orange. Fun shot! Jordan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
big_apple_ken Goldmember ![]() 1,838 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Hong Kong More info | Agreed. I would say it looks very much like a normal snapshot and not an HDR. Her skin tone rightfully says need to be tweaked as well so she is not so orange. Maybe it is just me but from the perspective you took this photo from of your fiance I don't think there really is a need for HDR. When I think of an HDR portrait I think something like of an amazingly colorful background of the sky and a perfectly exposure subject (with no artificial lights involved). Canon 5D3 | Canon 5D2 | Canon 5D | 15mm (fisheye) | 35L | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L |16-35L | 24-70L | 70-200L IS | MP-E 65 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 11, 2010 02:04 | #4 i see what you guys are saying... i am pretty new to the photography thing and am learning as i go. The reason i chose to use hdr was that all of my photos were pretty flat due to poor lighting outside, etc. As i lack a decent flash (and diffuser, etc.) and did not have a tripod, i thought i could get a better balanced photo by bracketing and making an hdr. Here is a slightly adjusted photo. Any better?
Thanks for your feedback. -Jon Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 60D, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 16-35 F4 IS L, Sigma 35 Art, Canon 24-105 L, Canon 60mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 100mm Macro IS L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moochies Member 36 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: San Clemente More info | Jan 11, 2010 02:39 | #5 I like the adjusted version way better. The image isn't so orange and the tones are smoother. My Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoJo2fast Goldmember ![]() 1,759 posts Likes: 93 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Jan 11, 2010 10:20 | #6 You don't need a flash and all that stuff to get a photo with good lighting... Jordan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Clive Copeman 693 guests, 202 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |