Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.		 OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS ➔ Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos ➔ RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Jan 2010 (Monday) 21:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help! LR JPG exports look nothing like photo when viewing in LR!

26 posts, 2 pages
1 2 Next
 
Poe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 21:55 |  #1

Hi folks,

For some reason I have yet to uncover, my JPG exports from LR look nothing like the image while I have the original file open in LR. This is the first time this has been happening. I haven't noticed anything like this with previous exports. The only difference is that these photos were shot using RAW + JPEG on my 5D rather than RAW. Could that be the issue? I'm going to calibrate my monitor shortly. Just giving it time to warm up before I do, but I figured some of you might know what's going on here. I have attached a link to the picture which I uploaded to tinyurl. The original is in LR while the export is open in windows photo gallery.

http://i48.tinypic.com​/6sqscg.jpg (external link)

Thanks for the help!


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 22:20 |  #2

100% chance (without bothering to look at the link) that you don't understand color management and ended up with a poor setup. Check out the links on Rene's signature, and you should be able to solve your issues fairly quickly.

I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 22:30 |  #3

basroil wrote in post #9375871 (external link)
100% chance (without bothering to look at the link) that you don't understand color management and ended up with a poor setup. Check out the links on Rene's signature, and you should be able to solve your issues fairly quickly.

I could be wrong but that doesn't look like a color management issue to me. That looks like his edits not being incorperated into the exported JPG. I would expect color shift without color management, I wouldn't expect that much of an exposure shift.

Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 22:45 |  #4

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #9375934 (external link)
I could be wrong but that doesn't look like a color management issue to me. That looks like his edits not being incorperated into the exported JPG. I would expect color shift without color management, I wouldn't expect that much of an exposure shift.

Checked the image now.... 100% certain it is a color management issue. Highlights are the same exposure, shadows are darker. It's actually quite common, and happened to me with firefox 3.5 when the color management fiasco was in full swing.

I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 23:06 |  #5

So what do I need to understand about color management? LR edits in ProPhoto RGB and I have LR export into sRGB for displaying on the web. Where did I go wrong with my color management?


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tepic
Member
Avatar
233 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Seattle
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 23:35 |  #6

How does it look in a browser? Just drag the JPG to Firefox to open.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 11, 2010 23:50 |  #7

It looks a lot better when I open it in my google Chrome browser. Shadows show more detail. Still not as much as what I can see in LR. What are you thinking?


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 00:11 |  #8

Poe wrote in post #9376320 (external link)
It looks a lot better when I open it in my google Chrome browser. Shadows show more detail. Still not as much as what I can see in LR. What are you thinking?

What OS are you running?

Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 00:31 |  #9

Vista 32bit


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 00:52 |  #10

Poe wrote in post #9376320 (external link)
It looks a lot better when I open it in my google Chrome browser. Shadows show more detail. Still not as much as what I can see in LR. What are you thinking?

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/member.p​hp?u=23893

Look at the links there.

I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 01:09 |  #11

Poe wrote in post #9376458 (external link)
Vista 32bit

Look in the color management section of the control panel and make sure the appropriate profile is associated with your monitor.

Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 01:27 |  #12

basroil wrote in post #9376542 (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/member.p​hp?u=23893

Look at the links there.

i've been reading his sticky in the main PP forum. first thing on the list is to calibrate the monitor. so i'm gonna do that shortly. then go from there.


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 01:47 |  #13

Thanks for the quick responses, all! It was a poor monitor profile. Here's an upload of the same comparison now that I have calibrated:

http://tinypic.com/r/f​3xdmr/6 (external link)

Yay!


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 01:52 |  #14

Poe wrote in post #9376721 (external link)
Thanks for the quick responses, all! It was a poor monitor profile. Here's an upload of the same comparison now that I have calibrated:

http://tinypic.com/r/f​3xdmr/6 (external link)

Yay!

And you didn't trust me when I said it was 100% a color management issue ;)

I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
More info
     
Jan 12, 2010 02:09 |  #15

basroil wrote in post #9376731 (external link)
And you didn't trust me when I said it was 100% a color management issue ;)

I assumed you meant my workflow, but it seems that certain programs suck at color management without a decent monitor profile.


Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

26 posts, 2 pages
1 2 Next
2,735 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Help! LR JPG exports look nothing like photo when viewing in LR!
FORUMS ➔ Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos ➔ RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home
Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1193 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.