Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Jan 2010 (Wednesday) 08:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Octabox Size Question

 
Edshropshire
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 08:54 |  #1

I have a home studio and for the most part have been using umbrellas, but I also have a small softbox. I generally take family portraits and a few individual shots. The small softbox works ok for the head shots, but I need something bigger for full body shots and family pictures. My studio space is 20x25 with 9 foot ceilings. I hope to have a bigger space by summer, but this is what I have now and it works pretty ok for now.

I am looking at two sizes of Octaboxs 35" and 47". I would like a few recommendations from those who have worked with both sizes. With my current setup do I need a 47" or am I better off with a 35".

Thanks for the advise
Ed


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Jan 13, 2010 09:01 |  #2

Have you looked into the PLM system from Paul Buff?

Link (external link)


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edshropshire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 09:21 |  #3

I have looked at the PLM system a little. I have a set of Alien Bee lights. I was looking at Paul's foldable octaboxes. I am not that familiar with the PLM system, have you tried it out and how do you think it compares to softboxes and octaboxes. On the Octaboxes I can buy a grid to help control the light spill, and I am thinking that might be helpful in my studio.

Thanks for the response I will look more at the PLM system. If anyone has experience with the PLM system I would appreciate any comments.


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Jan 13, 2010 09:29 |  #4

The PLM system is the next one I am investing in. I use a Speedlight set-up now and I am assuming I can use that system since it is an umbrella style system. I will then invest in a studio strobe system.

If you are goign for a large octo, those things are pricey. The 84" PLM with the accessories will run around $150. To me, it's worth the risk of trying it out.

There was a thread here with a link to a detailed review of the PLM system. I will post it if I can find it.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mufutau55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,278 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Bronx, New York City (USA)
     
Jan 13, 2010 09:39 as a reply to  @ CosmoKid's post |  #5

OP and Cosmokid, read the linked thread below for some setup of the PLM and speedlight.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=810258

Mufutau




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14869
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2010 09:42 |  #6

I have a 47inch octobox that I got off of ebay. Visico brand and Its great with the bees. But its not foldable which makes it a major pain to put together and take down. I would also suggest you look at the PLM although they are going to be on backorder for a while longer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jan 13, 2010 11:07 |  #7

Why not get bigger softbox?

I see all these references to PLM but I would imagine it to be limited use compared to a softbox.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Jan 13, 2010 11:43 |  #8

bobbyz wrote in post #9385257 (external link)
Why not get bigger softbox?

I see all these references to PLM but I would imagine it to be limited use compared to a softbox.


i thought with the PLM there are so many configurations that it would be a little more versatile.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edshropshire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 15:28 |  #9

bobbyz wrote in post #9385257 (external link)
Why not get bigger softbox?

I see all these references to PLM but I would imagine it to be limited use compared to a softbox.

Thanks everyone, I have thought about just getting a bigger softbox. On the MM forum a poster thought it might be better considering my size of studio. Photography is not my day job, but I have been doing photography for 35+ years and have been doing studio work with my Bees for the last 3 years. I wonder with the size of my studio which is not big, but also not really small I am wondering what the best size would be. I worry the the big one may be really too big for my setup.

Ed


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14869
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2010 15:31 |  #10

The 47in octo sticks out about 18 inches from the front of the alien bee faceplate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edshropshire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 15:35 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #9384778 (external link)
I have a 47inch octobox that I got off of ebay. Visico brand and Its great with the bees. But its not foldable which makes it a major pain to put together and take down. I would also suggest you look at the PLM although they are going to be on backorder for a while longer.

Thanks for the reference - is this the one you bought?
http://cgi.ebay.com …ain_0?hash=item​2ea94c3539 (external link)

What do others think of this vs going with the Bees foldable box?

Thanks


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14869
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 13, 2010 15:42 |  #12

Edshropshire wrote in post #9386855 (external link)
Thanks for the reference - is this the one you bought?
http://cgi.ebay.com …ain_0?hash=item​2ea94c3539 (external link)

What do others think of this vs going with the Bees foldable box?

Thanks


Nope I bought the 120cm version (47 vs 67 inches). Build quality is very good. Assembly isnt awful, but it takes a few minutes to assemble if you are going portable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edshropshire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 15:48 |  #13

Thanks - Yes, my metric conversion was a little off. I think the 47" would probably better serve my needs. I don't see myself ever going portable with my studio lights. In the field I use my 580ex and it meets my needs. I think this box may work really well - I don't see myself taking it down. I have space on a High shelf to leave it together.

I did find this review and it sounds really positive. http://www.kurbsterpho​tography.com/archives/​14 (external link)

Thanks for the suggestion. Has anyone else tried Visico? I am not a pro, and do studio work because I enjoy it and have fun taking pictures. I want to make sure my equipment works and is not junk, but I don't need equipment that needs to be tough enough to handle every day pro usage.


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mufutau55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,278 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Bronx, New York City (USA)
     
Jan 13, 2010 21:02 |  #14

I bought one of the one shown below but it's the 80cm size version, and I love it, the quality of the Visico from ebay seller "oeccamera" is very good.
I don't have room for bigger one..

Mufutau

Edshropshire wrote in post #9386855 (external link)
Thanks for the reference - is this the one you bought?
http://cgi.ebay.com …ain_0?hash=item​2ea94c3539 (external link)

What do others think of this vs going with the Bees foldable box?

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edshropshire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
453 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 522
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Provo, UT
     
Jan 13, 2010 23:10 |  #15

Thanks everyone - I may go with the Visico. The reviews I am reading are really good.


R5, 5D MK2, RF 100-500, RF 800 f11, RF 24-105 f4, RF 1.4c TC, RF 100-400, EF 70-200 f2.8 II,EF 24-70 L, 70-200 f4 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8,
https://theshire.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/shropshirefami​ly/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,876 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Octabox Size Question
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
736 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.