Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 13 Jan 2010 (Wednesday) 20:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

surf - San Diego (Wind and Sea La Jolla)

 
MMURAD
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 13, 2010 20:29 |  #1

We have a big swell hitting right now, so I grabbed the camera and ran down to see if I could get any good shots. Tide was dropping by the time I got there, so the waves where not quite as big.
I have never taken surf photography before and I the longest lens I have is the 55-250...definitely felt the limitations of the lens...but it was fun.
There were some pro photogs there with gigantic white lenses! I almost took pictures of those!
1

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2758/4273213950_3e34dfee81_o.jpg
2
IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2693/4273213856_5986ca6c5d_o.jpg
3
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4272469871_a587960bfe_o.jpg
4
IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2718/4273213774_70ccaf2622_o.jpg
5
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4013/4272469707_d0b20cfe0a_o.jpg

Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jan 13, 2010 21:27 |  #2

You've got a natural talent. All those pictures are good from a surfer's standpoint.

Your far range (250mm) turned out to be a good thing. If you look at all the Surfer Magazines from the 1970s, they had a lot of pulled back shots like this. I loved it because it gave a better perspective on the scene.

Most magazines now will only run closeups. These are nice, but the magazine's intent is to make sure the stickers on the surfboard can be read so that the advertising sponsors are happy.

Transworld Surf Magazine ran a cover a couple years go with Andy Irons on a borrowed board. THe board had no labels on it, and it caused a row at the magazine. It's silly.

Back in the 70s the magazines were incredibly better than they are now because the focus was on surfing, travel, waves, and the lifestyle.

Now it's all about dinero.


Your shots kickass. Keep doing exactly what you just did. Try to write down what time of day it was (and the date). Learn what you did right. You'll be surprised how hard it can be to duplicate it.

Number two is a little funky, but from a surfer's standpoint it makes you wonder, "did he make it?"

Also, the guy dropping in late and going right (with his back to the wave). I wonder if he got hammered of if he made it.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jan 13, 2010 21:33 |  #3

You know, looking back through these photos, it looks like you know surfing.

Number one isn't special in terms of what the surfer is doing, but the scene and the shape of the wave leads a fellow surfer to wonder what he's going to do as he works his way across that wave.

Number four is my favorite. That is a true classic California scene. Too bad the goofy photographer in the water got in the way of your shot, but that's no big deal.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 13, 2010 21:41 |  #4

MikeFairbanks wrote in post #9388888 (external link)
You've got a natural talent. All those pictures are good from a surfer's standpoint.

Your far range (250mm) turned out to be a good thing. If you look at all the Surfer Magazines from the 1970s, they had a lot of pulled back shots like this. I loved it because it gave a better perspective on the scene.

Most magazines now will only run closeups. These are nice, but the magazine's intent is to make sure the stickers on the surfboard can be read so that the advertising sponsors are happy.

Transworld Surf Magazine ran a cover a couple years go with Andy Irons on a borrowed board. THe board had no labels on it, and it caused a row at the magazine. It's silly.

Back in the 70s the magazines were incredibly better than they are now because the focus was on surfing, travel, waves, and the lifestyle.

Now it's all about dinero.


Your shots kickass. Keep doing exactly what you just did. Try to write down what time of day it was (and the date). Learn what you did right. You'll be surprised how hard it can be to duplicate it.

Number two is a little funky, but from a surfer's standpoint it makes you wonder, "did he make it?"

Also, the guy dropping in late and going right (with his back to the wave). I wonder if he got hammered of if he made it.

thanks!
I think it helps that I grew up surfing, now that I am older the water just seems too damn cold! lol

Ya the guy in shot #2 pulled it off. I cropped in tight to show his board perpendicular to the face of the wave. I was shocked he made it. Wave had a big ledge sucking up the face.

the other guy was way way to deep and got pounded. As he was getting up you see him trying to decide which way to go, and neither looked good. But you got to give him credit for going anyway.
I shot most of these in burst so I have the sequences.

I will probably go down tomorrow early morning and see what I can see.
West coast is tough late in the day with the sun in your face.


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:01 |  #5

He probably should have gone left.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:12 |  #6

I agree Mike, the left looked make able.

sequence of that ledgy drop in.

800
x
2663
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com …74809143_38fac2​c9c5_o.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Design
Member
Avatar
166 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: USA
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:17 as a reply to  @ MMURAD's post |  #7

Nice series I like #1 the best. Only caught one goofy footer in #3. Looks like this area breaks better to the left?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:23 |  #8

Design wrote in post #9389157 (external link)
Nice series I like #1 the best. Only caught one goofy footer in #3. Looks like this area breaks better to the left?

thanks, it is actually a point/beach break, so depending on the direction of the swell, anything can happen.
Today there was a nice right working on the inside, but just north and further outside off the point the left was working. I was out on the point in between the two breaks to catch both spots.


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jaewhy
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Torrance, CA
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:44 |  #9

#2 looks like Simmons, not Wind n Sea. if you shot this facing north and that wave came through about 100 yards south of Little Point, it's Simmons. that spot only breaks on a large west swell and it's very ledgy as seen in #2. if it is in fact Wind n Sea (directly west of the hut), i've never seen it that ledgy and i would've loved to have been there for some shack'age.

i agree with Mike's comment that you know surfing. for someone who doesn't surf (while not knowing if you're a surfer), it's usually tough to identify the good shots (ie: positioning,timing,etc​.) and you did a great job. keep it up, we still have at least 2 more days of good swell, especially in your neck of the woods.


BLOG (external link) * MAIN (external link) * FLICKr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 13, 2010 22:55 |  #10

Jaewhy wrote in post #9389280 (external link)
#2 looks like Simmons, not Wind n Sea. if you shot this facing north and that wave came through about 100 yards south of Little Point, it's Simmons. that spot only breaks on a large west swell and it's very ledgy as seen in #2. if it is in fact Wind n Sea (directly west of the hut), i've never seen it that ledgy and i would've loved to have been there for some shack'age.

i agree with Mike's comment that you know surfing. for someone who doesn't surf (while not knowing if you're a surfer), it's usually tough to identify the good shots (ie: positioning,timing,etc​.) and you did a great job. keep it up, we still have at least 2 more days of good swell, especially in your neck of the woods.

You may be right, I was facing north from wind and sea. I don't know the specific break names down here. I grew up surfing in Orange Country, but now live in San Diego but do not surf anymore.

thanks for the compliments, I will be back down there tomorrow and give it another try.


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeverFollow
Goldmember
1,474 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jan 14, 2010 02:02 |  #11

MMURAD wrote in post #9389335 (external link)
You may be right, I was facing north from wind and sea. I don't know the specific break names down here. I grew up surfing in Orange Country, but now live in San Diego but do not surf anymore.

thanks for the compliments, I will be back down there tomorrow and give it another try.

this link might help you with surf spot names, by the way nice shots


https://500px.com/chri​skennedydotphoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael15
Senior Member
Avatar
399 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA
     
Jan 14, 2010 07:41 |  #12

MMURAD wrote in post #9389335 (external link)
You may be right, I was facing north from wind and sea. I don't know the specific break names down here. I grew up surfing in Orange Country, but now live in San Diego but do not surf anymore.

thanks for the compliments, I will be back down there tomorrow and give it another try.


Great pics!! I'm in San Diego also. Why do you not surf anymore??

I'm sick about missing this swell as I'm headed to Colorado to play in the snow...


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 14, 2010 11:16 |  #13

Michael15 wrote in post #9390815 (external link)
Great pics!! I'm in San Diego also. Why do you not surf anymore??

I'm sick about missing this swell as I'm headed to Colorado to play in the snow...

working 50-60 hours a week tends to get in the way, plus I am over 40 and married.(hence no life)
Plus I grew up surfing Salt Creek with no one in the water, and surfing Baja when it was relatively safe. Now I just look at a lineup and have no desire to go fight the mob.


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael15
Senior Member
Avatar
399 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA
     
Jan 14, 2010 11:32 |  #14

MMURAD wrote in post #9392024 (external link)
working 50-60 hours a week tends to get in the way, plus I am over 40 and married.(hence no life)
Plus I grew up surfing Salt Creek with no one in the water, and surfing Baja when it was relatively safe. Now I just look at a lineup and have no desire to go fight the mob.

Ok....I get the working 50-60hrs...the crowded lineups...the wife....but over 40???? I'm 47 and just started surfing a couple years ago!! Good luck and great pics!


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMURAD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 14, 2010 11:55 |  #15

Michael15 wrote in post #9392117 (external link)
Ok....I get the working 50-60hrs...the crowded lineups...the wife....but over 40???? I'm 47 and just started surfing a couple years ago!! Good luck and great pics!

it's not so much the age as it is the crankiness. I see the crowds and mainly the teenagers in the water and the way they behave and I would end up punching one of them. :)
I regularly see 4 guys dropping in on each other and 2 spongers hopping them on the shoulder.


Name: Mike / 90D & 7D gripped / Sigma 35mm 1.4 / Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 / Sigma 150-600 Contemporary /Tamron 90 2.8 macro / Tamron 10-24mm / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / Tamron 70-300vc / Sigma 150-500os / Canon 580ex II
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,482 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
surf - San Diego (Wind and Sea La Jolla)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2835 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.